What has any poet to trust more than the feel of the thing?

What has any poet to trust more than the feel of the thing?

22/09/2025
25/10/2025

What has any poet to trust more than the feel of the thing? Theory concerns him only until he picks up his pen, and it begins to concern him again as soon as he lays it down.

What has any poet to trust more than the feel of the thing?
What has any poet to trust more than the feel of the thing?
What has any poet to trust more than the feel of the thing? Theory concerns him only until he picks up his pen, and it begins to concern him again as soon as he lays it down.
What has any poet to trust more than the feel of the thing?
What has any poet to trust more than the feel of the thing? Theory concerns him only until he picks up his pen, and it begins to concern him again as soon as he lays it down.
What has any poet to trust more than the feel of the thing?
What has any poet to trust more than the feel of the thing? Theory concerns him only until he picks up his pen, and it begins to concern him again as soon as he lays it down.
What has any poet to trust more than the feel of the thing?
What has any poet to trust more than the feel of the thing? Theory concerns him only until he picks up his pen, and it begins to concern him again as soon as he lays it down.
What has any poet to trust more than the feel of the thing?
What has any poet to trust more than the feel of the thing? Theory concerns him only until he picks up his pen, and it begins to concern him again as soon as he lays it down.
What has any poet to trust more than the feel of the thing?
What has any poet to trust more than the feel of the thing? Theory concerns him only until he picks up his pen, and it begins to concern him again as soon as he lays it down.
What has any poet to trust more than the feel of the thing?
What has any poet to trust more than the feel of the thing? Theory concerns him only until he picks up his pen, and it begins to concern him again as soon as he lays it down.
What has any poet to trust more than the feel of the thing?
What has any poet to trust more than the feel of the thing? Theory concerns him only until he picks up his pen, and it begins to concern him again as soon as he lays it down.
What has any poet to trust more than the feel of the thing?
What has any poet to trust more than the feel of the thing? Theory concerns him only until he picks up his pen, and it begins to concern him again as soon as he lays it down.
What has any poet to trust more than the feel of the thing?
What has any poet to trust more than the feel of the thing?
What has any poet to trust more than the feel of the thing?
What has any poet to trust more than the feel of the thing?
What has any poet to trust more than the feel of the thing?
What has any poet to trust more than the feel of the thing?
What has any poet to trust more than the feel of the thing?
What has any poet to trust more than the feel of the thing?
What has any poet to trust more than the feel of the thing?
What has any poet to trust more than the feel of the thing?

What has any poet to trust more than the feel of the thing? Theory concerns him only until he picks up his pen, and it begins to concern him again as soon as he lays it down.” Thus spoke John Ciardi, a poet of the twentieth century, but his words resound with the wisdom of all ages. In them he lays bare the mystery of creation: that art is born not from theory, but from the feel, the living pulse of inspiration that flows through the heart and into words. For theory is scaffolding, useful before and after, but in the moment of birth it is feeling, instinct, and fire that guide the hand.

The meaning of this saying is that creation cannot be caged by rules. A poet may study form, rhyme, and measure; he may discuss schools of thought and weigh the value of meter against free verse. Yet when he takes up the pen, none of these things command him. What commands him is the feel of the thing—the rhythm of his own blood, the sudden thunder of an image, the whisper of a line that insists on being written. Only afterward, when the poem is finished, may theory return to examine, to polish, to explain. But in the moment of creation, the poet must trust feeling above all.

The ancients knew this truth well. Homer, blind singer of Greece, did not weigh theory as he sang of Troy and Odysseus. His guide was not rule but the living current of memory and inspiration. Only centuries later did scholars dissect his verses into dactyls and hexameters. Likewise, the Hebrew prophets, whose words still thunder in scripture, did not pause to study rhetorical patterns before they spoke. They trusted the feel of the thing—the burning within them that demanded utterance. Theory came after; inspiration came first.

Consider the life of Vincent van Gogh, though he painted, not wrote. He studied, yes, but when he placed brush to canvas it was feeling that ruled—the swirl of a night sky, the blaze of sunflowers, the anguish of his own heart. Critics and theorists argued endlessly about his style, but his genius lay in his trust of instinct. He painted what he felt, not what he reasoned, and so his art speaks across centuries. Ciardi’s words mirror this truth: trust the inner current, for in it lies the soul of art.

And yet Ciardi does not dismiss theory entirely. He gives it its rightful place—before and after, as preparation and reflection. The poet may study to sharpen his tools, and he may analyze his work to refine it. But he warns us: do not let theory chain the act of creation itself. For when the poem is being born, hesitation is death. The poet must move with instinct, allowing the music within to pour forth unimpeded. Only then will the words carry life, breath, and power.

The lesson for us is profound. In whatever art or labor we pursue, there is a moment where thought must fall silent and feeling must take the lead. The craftsman learns his trade, the warrior studies his drills, the speaker rehearses his lines—but when the hour comes, he must act with instinct, trusting the feel of the thing. To cling to theory in the heat of the moment is to falter. To trust the body, the spirit, and the instinct shaped by practice is to triumph.

Therefore, children of tomorrow, remember Ciardi’s wisdom: learn your craft, yes, and honor theory. But when the moment of creation comes, set it aside. Trust the fire in your chest, the rhythm in your veins, the instinct born of practice. For it is not theory that breathes life into words, but feeling. And when the work is done, let theory return to sharpen and polish what inspiration has given. Thus shall your art live: born of feeling, refined by thought, yet never imprisoned by it.

John Ciardi
John Ciardi

English - Dramatist June 24, 1916 - March 30, 1986

Tocpics Related
Notable authors
Have 6 Comment What has any poet to trust more than the feel of the thing?

HQ10CT2-28- Le Hoang Quan

John Ciardi’s words suggest that the essence of poetry comes from the poet’s visceral connection to their work. But is there a danger in ignoring theory entirely? Could it lead to poetry that’s too abstract or inaccessible? On the other hand, is there room for poets who are naturally inclined toward structure and theory to still create work that feels authentic and emotionally powerful? What happens when theory and feeling collide in poetry?

Reply.
Information sender

TVthanh van

This quote resonates with how I feel about creativity in general—trusting your instincts is key. But does this suggest that a poet who is too theoretical will lack authenticity or raw emotion in their work? Or is there a way to merge the two? Could the tension between theory and emotion be what actually makes poetry interesting and layered, as both come into play at different stages of the writing process?

Reply.
Information sender

PAPhuong Anh

It’s interesting that Ciardi views theory as something secondary to the emotional connection with writing. Does that mean a poet should disregard all structure in favor of feeling? Or could it also be that those who write purely from feeling might need to revisit theory once the emotional part has been expressed? Is the process more about spontaneity or refining after the initial burst of creativity?

Reply.
Information sender

PLHai Phong Luyen

Ciardi’s quote about trusting the feel of a poem reminds me of how many artists talk about letting their work evolve naturally. But what happens when the ‘feel’ isn’t clear, or when a poet struggles to capture what they want to express? Is theory the tool they turn to in those moments? How often do you think poets find themselves torn between the theoretical and the instinctual? Does one ever dominate the other?

Reply.
Information sender

DNDo Duong Dan Nhi

This quote really speaks to me, especially the part about how theory only matters when the poet isn't actively writing. It’s almost like theory gets in the way of the creative process. But I wonder, does every poet truly trust their instinct in this way, or is there a certain point in their journey when theory becomes necessary? Can someone really create purely from feeling, or is that a myth in the writing world?

Reply.
Information sender
Leave the question
Click here to rate
Information sender