What I remain opposed to is the idea that David Cameron could go

What I remain opposed to is the idea that David Cameron could go

22/09/2025
22/09/2025

What I remain opposed to is the idea that David Cameron could go around and give up workers' rights, give up environmental protection, give up a whole load of things that are very important.

What I remain opposed to is the idea that David Cameron could go
What I remain opposed to is the idea that David Cameron could go
What I remain opposed to is the idea that David Cameron could go around and give up workers' rights, give up environmental protection, give up a whole load of things that are very important.
What I remain opposed to is the idea that David Cameron could go
What I remain opposed to is the idea that David Cameron could go around and give up workers' rights, give up environmental protection, give up a whole load of things that are very important.
What I remain opposed to is the idea that David Cameron could go
What I remain opposed to is the idea that David Cameron could go around and give up workers' rights, give up environmental protection, give up a whole load of things that are very important.
What I remain opposed to is the idea that David Cameron could go
What I remain opposed to is the idea that David Cameron could go around and give up workers' rights, give up environmental protection, give up a whole load of things that are very important.
What I remain opposed to is the idea that David Cameron could go
What I remain opposed to is the idea that David Cameron could go around and give up workers' rights, give up environmental protection, give up a whole load of things that are very important.
What I remain opposed to is the idea that David Cameron could go
What I remain opposed to is the idea that David Cameron could go around and give up workers' rights, give up environmental protection, give up a whole load of things that are very important.
What I remain opposed to is the idea that David Cameron could go
What I remain opposed to is the idea that David Cameron could go around and give up workers' rights, give up environmental protection, give up a whole load of things that are very important.
What I remain opposed to is the idea that David Cameron could go
What I remain opposed to is the idea that David Cameron could go around and give up workers' rights, give up environmental protection, give up a whole load of things that are very important.
What I remain opposed to is the idea that David Cameron could go
What I remain opposed to is the idea that David Cameron could go around and give up workers' rights, give up environmental protection, give up a whole load of things that are very important.
What I remain opposed to is the idea that David Cameron could go
What I remain opposed to is the idea that David Cameron could go
What I remain opposed to is the idea that David Cameron could go
What I remain opposed to is the idea that David Cameron could go
What I remain opposed to is the idea that David Cameron could go
What I remain opposed to is the idea that David Cameron could go
What I remain opposed to is the idea that David Cameron could go
What I remain opposed to is the idea that David Cameron could go
What I remain opposed to is the idea that David Cameron could go
What I remain opposed to is the idea that David Cameron could go

Hear the fiery words of Jeremy Corbyn, spoken in defiance of compromise and betrayal: “What I remain opposed to is the idea that David Cameron could go around and give up workers' rights, give up environmental protection, give up a whole load of things that are very important.” In this proclamation lies not only opposition to a man or a government, but to an idea—a dangerous idea that hard-won rights, carved from decades of struggle, could be surrendered for fleeting political gain. He speaks for the generations of laborers, reformers, and guardians of the earth who fought to place justice above expediency.

At the heart of his words is the sanctity of workers’ rights. These rights were not gifts bestowed by the powerful, but victories wrung from bitter struggles. They were earned in the strikes of miners, in the marches of factory workers, in the cries of men and women who demanded fair pay, safe workplaces, and dignity. To give them up lightly, as if they were coins to be exchanged in a bargain, is to betray the blood and sweat of those who fought for them. Corbyn’s voice here is the echo of every laborer who refused to bow before exploitation.

He also speaks of environmental protection, another treasure not easily won. For centuries, rivers were fouled, forests stripped bare, skies blackened, until the people themselves rose in outrage. Through law, protest, and vigilance, protections were established—laws that declared the earth not merely a resource to plunder but a trust to be safeguarded. To abandon these protections in the name of profit or political maneuver is to forget that the earth is not ours to destroy but ours to preserve for generations yet unborn.

History bears grim witness to the dangers of surrender. In the early days of the Industrial Revolution, before rights or protections were secured, workers toiled in factories for endless hours, children labored in mines, and pollution choked the very cities that profited from growth. It was only through decades of resistance and reform that laws arose to protect the vulnerable and restrain greed. Corbyn’s words recall this history, reminding us that what was once won can also be lost if vigilance falters.

Consider also the tragedy of the Great Smog of London in 1952, when thousands perished because environmental protections were nonexistent. It was this disaster that compelled leaders to establish the Clean Air Acts, proving that protections are written in response to suffering. To undo them would be to invite the same suffering once again. Corbyn’s opposition, then, is not mere stubbornness—it is rooted in memory, in the knowledge that history punishes those who neglect its lessons.

The wisdom of his saying is this: that rights and protections are fragile, no matter how long they have stood. They are always threatened by those who value power and profit above people and the planet. Leaders may speak of flexibility, of negotiation, of deals to be struck—but beneath such words often lies the erosion of safeguards. To oppose this is to stand as guardian not only of the present, but of the future.

Therefore, children of tomorrow, take heed of Jeremy Corbyn’s warning. Do not permit your rights to be treated as bargaining chips. Do not allow your protections to be stripped in silence. Remember that what you inherit was purchased by struggle, and what you surrender today may take generations to recover. Defend the dignity of labor, defend the purity of the earth, defend every safeguard won by those before you. For in doing so, you honor the past, protect the present, and secure the future. And let no ruler, however powerful, take from you the things that are very important.

Jeremy Corbyn
Jeremy Corbyn

British - Politician Born: May 26, 1949

Tocpics Related
Notable authors
Have 0 Comment What I remain opposed to is the idea that David Cameron could go

AAdministratorAdministrator

Welcome, honored guests. Please leave a comment, we will respond soon

Reply.
Information sender
Leave the question
Click here to rate
Information sender