When a man fails to see the truth of certain generally accepted

When a man fails to see the truth of certain generally accepted

22/09/2025
20/10/2025

When a man fails to see the truth of certain generally accepted views, there is no law compelling him to provoke animosity by announcing his dissent.

When a man fails to see the truth of certain generally accepted
When a man fails to see the truth of certain generally accepted
When a man fails to see the truth of certain generally accepted views, there is no law compelling him to provoke animosity by announcing his dissent.
When a man fails to see the truth of certain generally accepted
When a man fails to see the truth of certain generally accepted views, there is no law compelling him to provoke animosity by announcing his dissent.
When a man fails to see the truth of certain generally accepted
When a man fails to see the truth of certain generally accepted views, there is no law compelling him to provoke animosity by announcing his dissent.
When a man fails to see the truth of certain generally accepted
When a man fails to see the truth of certain generally accepted views, there is no law compelling him to provoke animosity by announcing his dissent.
When a man fails to see the truth of certain generally accepted
When a man fails to see the truth of certain generally accepted views, there is no law compelling him to provoke animosity by announcing his dissent.
When a man fails to see the truth of certain generally accepted
When a man fails to see the truth of certain generally accepted views, there is no law compelling him to provoke animosity by announcing his dissent.
When a man fails to see the truth of certain generally accepted
When a man fails to see the truth of certain generally accepted views, there is no law compelling him to provoke animosity by announcing his dissent.
When a man fails to see the truth of certain generally accepted
When a man fails to see the truth of certain generally accepted views, there is no law compelling him to provoke animosity by announcing his dissent.
When a man fails to see the truth of certain generally accepted
When a man fails to see the truth of certain generally accepted views, there is no law compelling him to provoke animosity by announcing his dissent.
When a man fails to see the truth of certain generally accepted
When a man fails to see the truth of certain generally accepted
When a man fails to see the truth of certain generally accepted
When a man fails to see the truth of certain generally accepted
When a man fails to see the truth of certain generally accepted
When a man fails to see the truth of certain generally accepted
When a man fails to see the truth of certain generally accepted
When a man fails to see the truth of certain generally accepted
When a man fails to see the truth of certain generally accepted
When a man fails to see the truth of certain generally accepted

Listen well, O children of wisdom, for there is a deep truth in the words of George Henry Lewes, a man who understood the power of thought and the consequences of speaking out. He once said, "When a man fails to see the truth of certain generally accepted views, there is no law compelling him to provoke animosity by announcing his dissent." These words call us to recognize the delicate balance between truth, opinion, and society. It is one thing to hold a different view, but it is another to confront the world with it in a way that causes unnecessary division. Lewes speaks of the wisdom of discretion — of knowing when to voice disagreement and when to hold one’s peace.

The essence of Lewes’ teaching lies in the understanding that truth is not always a simple matter of contradiction. We live in a world filled with ideas, many of which are deeply ingrained in the fabric of society. These generally accepted views, these beliefs held by the many, form the foundations upon which our communities are built. Yet, not all truths are immediately visible to the eye of every individual, and not all perceptions are the same. When a man sees things differently from those around him, it is not always his duty to announce that difference with force, for there is a price to pay in the animosity it may provoke.

Consider the story of Socrates, whose unwavering search for truth led him to question the most sacred of Athenian beliefs. Socrates’ life was defined by his relentless pursuit of knowledge, by his commitment to questioning the status quo. Yet, though his heart was full of wisdom, he did not always seek to provoke for the sake of provoking. His method was one of gentle questioning, seeking to lead others to the truth without simply declaring it. In this, he was guided by a sense of discretion, understanding that not all battles need to be fought, and not every opinion needs to be announced with force. In the end, Socrates’ insistence on truth cost him dearly, but he was no fool in his decision to speak — he chose his moments carefully, fully aware of the weight of his words.

Lewes’ words remind us of the importance of timing and judgment in our actions. To hold a different view is one thing, but to express that view in a way that deliberately stirs conflict is another. It is not that one must always remain silent when dissenting from the accepted views of the world, but rather that one should approach such moments with the wisdom of a sage. The man who speaks recklessly, provoking discord where none is necessary, brings not truth but chaos into the world. In this, there is a lesson not only in wisdom but in compassion — for sometimes, the greater act of courage is not in declaring dissent, but in knowing when to remain quiet and preserve peace.

Let us reflect on Galileo Galilei, who challenged the beliefs of his time with his discovery that the Earth revolved around the sun. He, too, saw a truth that was not yet accepted, and he knew the consequences of his proclamation. His views were met with hostility, and he was forced to recant under threat of persecution. Yet, Galileo’s dissent was not born out of a desire for conflict, but out of a profound belief in the pursuit of knowledge. In his case, his truth was vital for the progress of humanity, but the lessons of his life also teach us the importance of discretion, of knowing when the time is right to challenge prevailing views and when it may be wiser to work quietly toward change.

Thus, O children of wisdom, the lesson of Lewes is clear: truth must be pursued with courage, but it must also be approached with discernment. Not all that we see as truth must be proclaimed loudly for all to hear. There is no law that compels us to stir the pot of animosity when we disagree with widely held beliefs. Sometimes, the most powerful act of wisdom is to hold one’s peace, to test the waters of one’s thoughts with care, and to choose the right time and manner in which to speak.

In your own lives, seek to live with wisdom. When you find yourself in disagreement with the world, take a moment to consider the impact of your words. Is your dissent driven by a desire for understanding, or by a desire for conflict? Ask yourself: will speaking out move you closer to truth, or will it only serve to alienate others and cloud the path forward? In some cases, the highest truth may be found in the silence between words, in the pause that allows you to reflect, to understand, and to decide when it is time to speak and when it is time to be still.

Let discretion be your guide, O children, and let your pursuit of truth be not only a journey of discovery but one of wisdom in how you share that truth with the world. Speak with intention, and when silence is more powerful than words, choose it. In this, you will find the true strength of your voice and the peace that comes with knowing when to use it.

Tocpics Related
Notable authors
Have 5 Comment When a man fails to see the truth of certain generally accepted

TTNguyen Thuy Tram

Lewes seems to be suggesting that we don’t have to confront every belief we disagree with, which makes me wonder: Does this promote passivity? How can we engage in constructive debate without escalating conflict? Are there times when it’s important to speak out against commonly accepted views to challenge the status quo, and how do we ensure that our dissent is heard without causing harm?

Reply.
Information sender

DVDat Vu

Lewes’ perspective makes me question the importance of social cohesion versus the need for personal integrity. While it might be wise to avoid provoking animosity, isn’t there a moral obligation to challenge harmful or inaccurate beliefs? How do we strike the balance between speaking out when necessary and avoiding unnecessary confrontation? Is there a risk of becoming complacent if we never voice our dissent?

Reply.
Information sender

UNnguyen le uyen nhi

I can see the wisdom in Lewes’ words. Sometimes, keeping quiet about disagreements is the most peaceful choice, especially in situations where speaking out might lead to unnecessary tension. But, does that mean we should always remain silent, or are there times when it’s essential to voice our dissent for the greater good? Can we be true to ourselves while avoiding unnecessary conflict?

Reply.
Information sender

HHHung Hoang

This quote by Lewes suggests that it’s okay to disagree, but we don’t always have to make it known, especially if it might cause unnecessary conflict. But how do we find the courage to speak out when we believe something is fundamentally wrong? Is there a time when silence enables harmful beliefs to thrive? At what point should we speak up, even at the risk of causing animosity?

Reply.
Information sender

MMMai Mai Mai

George Henry Lewes' quote raises an interesting point about the balance between truth and social harmony. Is it always necessary to voice disagreement, or can we simply choose to stay silent when we don’t agree with generally accepted views? But does silence sometimes allow falsehoods to persist? How do we navigate the line between remaining true to our beliefs and maintaining peace, especially when dissent might lead to conflict?

Reply.
Information sender
Leave the question
Click here to rate
Information sender