When I was 23, I went to my dad's second wedding, full of
When I was 23, I went to my dad's second wedding, full of tightly repressed rage, given expression only by my wedding outfit. I wore a suit, because it was a wedding, but I also went for a bright red T-shirt with the word 'ANTI' printed on it, a necklace with a silver gun pendant and a brooch that looked a bit like a swastika.
Hearken, O children of emotion and the human heart, to the words of Simon Amstell, who recounts a moment of profound inner conflict at the age of twenty-three. He attended his father’s second wedding, burdened with tightly repressed rage, emotions unspoken yet demanding expression. In that delicate tension, he chose to communicate through attire, wearing a suit in conformity to the ritual, but pairing it with a bright red T-shirt emblazoned with ‘ANTI’, a silver gun pendant, and a brooch that echoed the forms of history’s darkest symbols. Herein lies a timeless teaching: the human spirit often seeks voice and agency, even when bound by obligation and ceremony.
Amstell’s choice of clothing as expression is emblematic of the way mortals throughout history have used symbols to communicate what words could not. From the robes of philosophers in ancient Greece, dyed with the colors of dissent, to the banners of protest in medieval Europe, the body becomes a canvas of the soul, a medium through which rage, defiance, and identity are manifested. In this single moment of wedding observance, attire became the vessel for the complex interplay of duty, rebellion, and selfhood.
Consider the tale of Oscar Wilde, who, in his youth, adorned himself in velvet, lace, and floral pins, defying the conventions of his age to assert his identity and intellect. Like Amstell, Wilde understood that external appearance could become a mirror of the internal world, a way to challenge authority, signal autonomy, and make visible the invisible currents of feeling. Through his bold choices, one perceives the eternal human struggle to reconcile emotion and expectation.
In this episode, there is also the lesson of contradiction and reconciliation. The suit honored the wedding, an acknowledgment of social convention, while the red T-shirt, the pendant, and the provocative brooch declared the individual’s inner turmoil. Life is seldom a clean division between duty and desire; rather, it is the juxtaposition of restraint and rebellion, of ceremony and authentic expression, that shapes the richness of human experience.
O seekers of wisdom, note this: the rites we attend, even those steeped in tradition, need not silence the self. By weaving truth into ritual, one honors both the external demands of society and the internal currents of feeling. Amstell’s audacity demonstrates that even in structured spaces, the human spirit finds ways to assert its presence, leaving traces of honesty, humor, and defiance for all to witness.
Thus, O children, carry this teaching: in the ceremonies of life, allow space for the authentic self to breathe, to speak through subtle or bold symbols. For in the tension between expectation and emotion lies the eternal lesson of humanity—that even amidst ritual, the soul may declare its rage, its autonomy, and its unyielding voice, transforming a simple gathering into a profound testament of identity.
LLshshdhd
That’s a powerful and provocative way to express your emotions at such an emotionally charged event. I can’t help but wonder if your choice of attire was a way to protect yourself, to distance yourself from the event. Did it give you a sense of control over the situation, or did it leave you feeling more disconnected from the people around you?
BNPhan Bao Nhi
Your description paints such a vivid picture of inner conflict. Wearing that outfit must have been a way to externalize your feelings when words couldn't capture the complexity of your emotions. How did people react to your outfit, and did it change how you viewed your dad’s second wedding afterward? Did you ever feel any regrets about expressing yourself in that way?
CVDao Cong Vinh
Your choice of outfit speaks volumes about the way you were feeling, and it seems like you were using it as a kind of protest or rebellion. Do you think that was a conscious attempt to deal with your emotions, or was it more about expressing your discontent with the situation in a way that felt right for you? How do you feel about that moment now?
NNguyen
That’s such an interesting form of self-expression, especially in such a traditionally joyful setting. What made you choose that outfit to show your emotions? Did it feel like a way to get back at the situation or a more personal declaration of where you were mentally at the time? It sounds like you were challenging the status quo in your own way.
THTran huy
Wow, that’s a pretty striking choice of outfit! I can only imagine the kind of impact it had on those around you. It seems like you were channeling your anger and rebellion through your fashion, but did it feel cathartic for you in the moment? Did you feel like it helped you express something that was otherwise hard to articulate?