
Women are half the population of the world, and yet there are so
Women are half the population of the world, and yet there are so few female characters on-screen.






Hear the words of Geena Davis, actress and advocate, who gazed upon the glittering screens of cinema and spoke with piercing clarity: “Women are half the population of the world, and yet there are so few female characters on-screen.” These words cut like a blade, exposing the contradiction between reality and representation, between the fullness of humanity and the narrowness of its reflection. They remind us that even in the realms of art and imagination, where all things should be possible, the chains of inequality still bind.
The origin of this truth lies in the long history of storytelling. From the ancient myths to the stages of Shakespeare, from the silent films of the past to the blockbusters of today, stories have shaped how humanity sees itself. Yet too often, the gaze has been narrowed, centered on men, leaving women as shadows, ornaments, or side characters. The screen, which holds the power to inspire generations, has reflected not the true balance of the world, but a distorted vision—half the world silenced, half the truth untold.
Consider the story of 1979’s Alien, where Ellen Ripley, portrayed by Sigourney Weaver, became one of the first women to lead a science fiction film. At first, the role had been written for a man, but when rewritten for a woman, it shattered expectations and revealed the power of representation. Audiences were enthralled not merely because she fought monsters, but because she embodied a new vision of heroism: a woman who was resourceful, strong, and central to the story. This single character opened the door for countless others, yet Geena Davis reminds us that such examples remain the exception, not the rule.
The imbalance is not only injustice, it is blindness. To deny women presence on-screen is to deny their dreams, their stories, their possibilities. A young girl watching a thousand films, and seeing only men as leaders, warriors, or visionaries, may come to believe that such roles are not for her. Representation is not vanity; it is power, for what the screen shows becomes the mirror in which society sees its future.
And yet, there is hope. Geena Davis, through her Institute on Gender in Media, has worked to reveal the numbers, to show the stark truth of inequality, and to inspire change. The conversations her words ignited have spread across Hollywood and beyond, leading creators to rethink how they tell stories, how they cast characters, and how they shape the images that fill the world’s imagination. Like the suffragettes of old, who marched to make women visible in politics, Davis calls for women to be visible in art—and thus visible in the minds of all who dream.
The lesson for us is this: representation matters deeply. Art is not mere entertainment; it is the forge of values, the sculptor of beliefs. To exclude women from stories is to weaken humanity’s imagination itself. Every story without a woman’s voice is a story half-told, every screen without women’s presence is a screen half-dark. True justice requires not only laws and rights, but images, symbols, and stories that honor all.
What actions, then, must we take? Support the films, shows, and plays that place women at their center. Teach children to see value in all voices, not only those long amplified. Demand change from creators, producers, and institutions that still cling to imbalance. And in our daily lives, let us listen to women’s stories with reverence, for they are not additions to humanity’s song—they are half of the melody itself.
Thus, remember Geena Davis’s words: women are half the population of the world, and so they must be half the story, half the vision, half the dream. Until this balance is reached, our art will remain incomplete, our imagination stunted, and our reflection in the mirror of culture distorted. But when it is achieved, the stories of humanity will shine in their fullness, and the world will finally see itself whole.
DANgo Duyen Anh
Davis’ quote is a powerful reminder of how much more needs to be done to achieve gender equality in media. If women are half the population, shouldn't they at least be reflected equally in films and television? What would it take for the entertainment industry to shift its focus and ensure more women are given strong, nuanced roles? Are audiences demanding more female-driven stories, or are the decision-makers still resistant to this change?
TLThi thanh thuy Le
It’s incredible that, despite women being half of the population, we’re still underrepresented in media. Geena Davis is right – this glaring imbalance needs attention. But what steps can the industry take to remedy this? Should there be quotas for female representation in film, or should we simply aim for more organic inclusion of diverse, compelling female stories? How do we challenge the long-standing norms in a meaningful way?
VVinh
Geena Davis’ statement is eye-opening, especially when you consider how the media shapes our perceptions of gender roles. What does it say about society that female characters are still outnumbered on-screen, despite women making up half the world? How can we make sure this imbalance is addressed not just in quantity, but in the quality of roles that women are given? Should we be more proactive in supporting films that prioritize female characters?
PLPhu Le
This quote really resonates with me. Why are we still struggling with this? If women make up 50% of the population, why does Hollywood continue to focus so much on male-driven narratives? Does it reflect a deeper cultural bias about what stories are ‘worth telling’? What are the consequences of this lack of representation? How can we ensure that the next generation of filmmakers focuses on creating more diverse and complex female characters?
DMDuc Mai
Davis' statement makes me reflect on how far we still need to go in terms of equality, even in entertainment. It’s frustrating that such a basic truth – that women are half of the world’s population – doesn’t translate into equal on-screen representation. But why do you think this discrepancy still exists? Are there structural barriers within the film industry, or is it simply that women’s stories are still undervalued?