You can choose not to sit on the fence. You can choose not to

You can choose not to sit on the fence. You can choose not to

22/09/2025
15/10/2025

You can choose not to sit on the fence. You can choose not to criticise. You must stand as guard at the door of your own mind and choose to be positive.

You can choose not to sit on the fence. You can choose not to
You can choose not to sit on the fence. You can choose not to
You can choose not to sit on the fence. You can choose not to criticise. You must stand as guard at the door of your own mind and choose to be positive.
You can choose not to sit on the fence. You can choose not to
You can choose not to sit on the fence. You can choose not to criticise. You must stand as guard at the door of your own mind and choose to be positive.
You can choose not to sit on the fence. You can choose not to
You can choose not to sit on the fence. You can choose not to criticise. You must stand as guard at the door of your own mind and choose to be positive.
You can choose not to sit on the fence. You can choose not to
You can choose not to sit on the fence. You can choose not to criticise. You must stand as guard at the door of your own mind and choose to be positive.
You can choose not to sit on the fence. You can choose not to
You can choose not to sit on the fence. You can choose not to criticise. You must stand as guard at the door of your own mind and choose to be positive.
You can choose not to sit on the fence. You can choose not to
You can choose not to sit on the fence. You can choose not to criticise. You must stand as guard at the door of your own mind and choose to be positive.
You can choose not to sit on the fence. You can choose not to
You can choose not to sit on the fence. You can choose not to criticise. You must stand as guard at the door of your own mind and choose to be positive.
You can choose not to sit on the fence. You can choose not to
You can choose not to sit on the fence. You can choose not to criticise. You must stand as guard at the door of your own mind and choose to be positive.
You can choose not to sit on the fence. You can choose not to
You can choose not to sit on the fence. You can choose not to criticise. You must stand as guard at the door of your own mind and choose to be positive.
You can choose not to sit on the fence. You can choose not to
You can choose not to sit on the fence. You can choose not to
You can choose not to sit on the fence. You can choose not to
You can choose not to sit on the fence. You can choose not to
You can choose not to sit on the fence. You can choose not to
You can choose not to sit on the fence. You can choose not to
You can choose not to sit on the fence. You can choose not to
You can choose not to sit on the fence. You can choose not to
You can choose not to sit on the fence. You can choose not to
You can choose not to sit on the fence. You can choose not to

Hear the commanding words of Gail Kelly, who proclaimed: “You can choose not to sit on the fence. You can choose not to criticise. You must stand as guard at the door of your own mind and choose to be positive.” In this utterance lies a call to action, a summons for the soul to awaken from apathy and claim its rightful dominion. For neutrality, when cloaked in cowardice, becomes surrender; criticism, when empty and unkind, becomes poison. Only vigilance over one’s own thoughts can transform life into strength and meaning.

To sit on the fence is to dwell in hesitation, to refuse the responsibility of choice. Such a posture spares one the risk of failure but also denies the possibility of triumph. History has never honored the undecided. Heroes are not those who linger in indecision but those who step forward, even trembling, to declare where they stand. Kelly’s words remind us that choosing is itself a moral act, and to abstain from choosing is often to side with weakness.

To criticise without purpose is to drain the spirit of both speaker and hearer. There is a noble critique that builds, that sharpens, that points to better ways; but there is also the lazy criticism that mocks, belittles, and destroys. The former is a tool of growth, the latter a toxin of the soul. By choosing to refrain from destructive criticism, we protect not only others but also ourselves, for the bitterness of criticism is a fire that burns the vessel that carries it.

Thus Kelly urges us to stand guard at the door of the mind. This is no casual image, but a call to vigilance. Thoughts are the seeds of destiny. If we allow envy, fear, or despair to enter unchecked, they will root themselves deeply, twisting the soul. But if we watch carefully, if we admit only courage, gratitude, and resolve, then our minds become gardens of strength. The guard at the gate must be tireless, for the assaults of negativity are constant, and only the disciplined survive.

History shows us the power of this principle. Consider Marcus Aurelius, emperor of Rome and stoic philosopher. Amid wars, betrayals, and plague, he wrote in his meditations that the mind is sovereign, that no man can harm the soul unless it consents. He stood as a guard at the door of his mind, refusing despair, refusing anger, and choosing to live in wisdom and strength. His empire may have been shaken, but his inner citadel remained unbroken.

So too we recall Mahatma Gandhi, who, in the face of hatred and violence, refused to admit bitterness into his heart. He chose instead to guard his mind with truth and nonviolence. Surrounded by criticism, mocked as weak, he held firm to his positivity and his values, and in the end, his spirit triumphed over an empire. His life is living proof of Kelly’s teaching: that what enters the mind shapes the destiny of nations.

The meaning of this quote is thus: each of us is sovereign over our inner world. We cannot always control the winds of circumstance, nor silence the voices of others, but we can determine what enters and takes root in our minds. To choose positivity is not naive—it is the highest form of discipline, the act of aligning one’s thoughts with hope, strength, and constructive action. From such discipline flows resilience, courage, and the power to inspire others.

The lesson for us is clear: do not wait upon the fence, do not waste life in petty criticism, and above all, guard the gates of your mind. Practical wisdom calls us to three acts. First, decide with courage, even when uncertainty remains, for indecision is itself a silent defeat. Second, speak only the kind of criticism that builds and refuse the kind that destroys. Third, watch your thoughts each day as a sentinel watches the city gates, admitting only those that strengthen your spirit. In doing so, you will live not as a passive spectator, but as a master of your own fate, and a beacon to all who walk beside you.

Gail Kelly
Gail Kelly

South African - Businesswoman Born: April 25, 1956

Tocpics Related
Notable authors
Have 6 Comment You can choose not to sit on the fence. You can choose not to

NMNhi Mai

This quote makes me think about leadership and emotional intelligence. The idea of guarding your mind sounds like an essential practice for people in positions of influence. But I wonder how one maintains that balance between positivity and authenticity. Can constant positivity ever come across as dismissive of real problems? Maybe the trick is not in suppressing negative thoughts but transforming them into something useful or solution-oriented.

Reply.
Information sender

BTBakiu Tran

What stands out to me in this message is the personal accountability it demands. Gail Kelly seems to suggest that our mindset isn’t something that just happens—it’s something we must actively protect. I can relate to that idea, but it also feels like a lot of pressure. Is it realistic to be on guard all the time? Perhaps being positive also means allowing ourselves moments of vulnerability or doubt without losing perspective.

Reply.
Information sender

FFFrom The Dead Free Fire

This quote struck me because it connects positivity to decisiveness. Choosing not to sit on the fence implies that positivity requires courage and conviction. But I wonder if avoiding criticism completely might sometimes lead to complacency. Isn’t it possible to be positive while still questioning things that need improvement? Maybe the key is to challenge ideas with purpose rather than with hostility.

Reply.
Information sender

HNTran Hong Ngoc

I think this quote highlights an important idea—that we’re responsible for what we allow into our minds. It makes me reflect on how much influence media and social environments have on our outlook. Do we really have full control over our mindset, or are we constantly fighting against outside negativity? It’s a good reminder that mental discipline might be as crucial as physical or emotional resilience.

Reply.
Information sender

TTTran Tien Thanh

This statement feels like both motivation and a challenge. Gail Kelly makes positivity sound like a conscious act of leadership, which I find inspiring. Still, I’m curious whether she believes there’s value in criticism when it’s constructive. Isn’t there a difference between being negative and being analytical? It’s possible to want improvement without spreading negativity, so maybe it’s about how we express our thoughts, not whether we have them.

Reply.
Information sender
Leave the question
Click here to rate
Information sender