You can't trust code that you did not totally create yourself.

Hearken to the warning of Ken Thompson, one of the ancient architects of the digital age, who declared: “You can’t trust code that you did not totally create yourself.” These words, though clothed in the garb of programming, rise far above the narrow world of machines. They are a teaching about trust, about the hidden powers that dwell in the unseen, and about the vigilance required to guard against what lies beneath the surface. For what is code but the law by which the world of computers is governed, and what is trust but the foundation upon which the realm of men and their creations rests?

Thompson spoke these words in the context of his famous revelation, “Reflections on Trusting Trust,” in which he unveiled a hidden danger: that even the tools we use to build code—the compilers themselves—could be secretly corrupted. A man might examine every line of his program and believe it pure, yet if the compiler that translated it into life were poisoned, then corruption would spread invisibly, like a shadow in the heart. Thus Thompson revealed a truth that shook the world of computing: you cannot fully trust what you did not create with your own hands, for deception can be buried too deep for the eye to see.

Consider, then, the story of the Trojan Horse from the days of Troy. The people of the city rejoiced when they found the wooden gift left by their foes; they pulled it into their gates, believing it a token of peace. Yet within it hid warriors waiting to destroy them. Just so in the world of code: a program received from another may appear noble and harmless, but within its depths, hidden instructions may betray the trust of those who use it. The ancients who fell to trickery remind us of the same truth Thompson voiced—that to trust blindly in what we have not built or tested is to invite ruin into our gates.

But this teaching does not end with software or war. It is a parable for life itself. How often do men and women accept the beliefs, the customs, the systems handed down to them without question? They build their lives upon traditions they did not test, upon promises they did not prove. And when these unseen codes of conduct betray them, they wonder why the foundation cracks. Thompson’s wisdom is a call to awaken: to examine, to understand, to take ownership of the structures upon which we depend. For only what you create and comprehend fully can be trusted as wholly your own.

Yet we must not take this as a command to walk alone, crafting every tool by our own hand. Humanity is built upon cooperation, and to reject the works of others entirely is folly. Rather, the lesson is to engage with vigilance and wisdom. When you rely upon the labor of others, do so with eyes open, verifying, questioning, and testing. Build communities where transparency reigns, where code is open for all to see, and where trust is earned by light, not assumed in darkness. This is why the open-source movement rose: to tear down the walls of secrecy and replace them with the shared guardianship of many eyes.

The practical teaching for your own life is this: whatever path you walk, do not entrust your soul, your work, or your safety to what you have never examined. If you inherit traditions, question them. If you depend on systems, understand their workings. If you use tools, learn their nature. And if you must place trust in others, let it be trust earned by transparency and tested by truth. In this way, you guard yourself against the hidden snares that might betray you.

Therefore, remember the words of Thompson as a commandment of both technology and life: trust is sacred, but it must be built, examined, and proven. Blind trust is the doorway through which deception enters, but tested trust is the foundation upon which civilizations endure. Write your own code in life as carefully as the coder writes his programs, and examine the codes of others with vigilance. In this way, you will walk not in blindness, but in clarity, and your creations will stand firm against the shadows of betrayal.

–––