Alchemy is the art of far and near, and I think poetry is
Alchemy is the art of far and near, and I think poetry is alchemy in that way. It's delightful to distort size, to see something that's tiny as though it were vast.
“Alchemy is the art of far and near, and I think poetry is alchemy in that way. It’s delightful to distort size, to see something that’s tiny as though it were vast.” Thus speaks Robert Morgan, unveiling the secret kinship between the forgotten science of transformation and the eternal art of words. For just as alchemy sought to change base metal into gold, so does poetry transform the ordinary into the extraordinary, the small into the infinite, the near into the eternal. In these words, Morgan reminds us that the poet’s task is not merely to describe, but to transmute.
The meaning of this vision lies in the act of transformation. Alchemy was never only about gold; it was about perception, about seeing the hidden potential within the unremarkable. So too with poetry: a raindrop becomes an ocean, a blade of grass becomes a cathedral, the briefest glance becomes eternity. The poet distorts size, not to deceive, but to awaken. By magnifying the tiny, he shows us its grandeur; by shrinking the vast, he reveals its intimacy. Through this art, we are taught that all things contain wonder if only we learn to see them rightly.
Consider the story of William Blake, who wrote of “seeing a world in a grain of sand, and a heaven in a wildflower.” Blake was no chemist, but an alchemist of vision. To him, a speck of dust could be a universe, and a human face could reflect eternity. This was no exaggeration—it was the unveiling of a truth hidden beneath the veil of habit. Like Morgan, Blake knew that poetry distorts not to lie, but to reveal the immeasurable within the measurable.
The origin of Morgan’s words rests also in the heritage of alchemy itself, that ancient pursuit where men searched not only for gold but for wisdom. Alchemists spoke of the “as above, so below,” the belief that the tiny mirrored the vast, the earthly reflected the cosmic. What they sought in crucibles, poets seek in words: to bind far and near, to show that the microcosm contains the macrocosm. Thus Morgan, inheriting this ancient vision, sees poetry as a continuation of alchemy by other means.
This truth brings us to a lesson of perception. Most of us pass through the world blind to the splendor of the small. We think greatness belongs only to the towering and the grand. But the poet reminds us: what is small may contain the vast. A child’s smile may outweigh an empire’s triumph. A fleeting moment may hold more eternity than years of toil. To see in this way is to live with wonder, and wonder is the beginning of wisdom.
History also gives us the example of Galileo, who, through his telescope, took the tiny speck of light in the sky and revealed it to be a world with mountains and craters. He distorted size, but in doing so, he restored truth. Like a poet, he showed that what seemed small and distant was vast and near. The same courage of vision is what poetry demands: the willingness to see differently, to risk the laugh of others, and to proclaim that the universe lies hidden in the overlooked.
The practical teaching is this: practice alchemy of vision in your own life. When you see something small—a leaf, a gesture, a fleeting word—ask yourself what vastness it might contain. When you face something large—a fear, a task, a sorrow—dare to shrink it with words, until it can be held in your hand. Write, speak, or simply notice with care, and you will begin to live as both alchemist and poet, finding gold where others see only dust.
Thus, let the teaching endure: poetry is alchemy, and every soul can practice it. To see far in the near, to see vastness in the tiny, is to live with vision. And the one who learns this art will never again be blind to beauty, for they will carry in their sight the golden truth—that the infinite is always hidden within the finite, waiting for the poet’s gaze to bring it forth.
MHMy Ha
I find this idea fascinating because it frames poetry as a tool for reimagining reality. Could the analogy to alchemy imply that poets possess a magical or experimental role, transforming ordinary experience into something extraordinary? I also wonder whether this distortion of size is symbolic, reflecting emotional or psychological intensity rather than literal scale. How does this influence how readers connect with poetry—does it invite us to see the world through heightened sensitivity and wonder?
NMDoan Thi Ngoc Minh
This quote prompts me to consider the interplay between scale and significance in poetic imagery. Could Morgan be suggesting that poetry gives value and weight to moments or objects that might otherwise seem insignificant? I wonder whether this ability to manipulate perception mirrors the human desire to find meaning in everyday life. Additionally, does this alchemical transformation rely on language alone, or do rhythm, sound, and structure also contribute to enlarging our perception of the small?
LNLe Nhuot
From a reader’s perspective, this statement raises questions about the subjective nature of perception in poetry. Could the delight in seeing something tiny as vast suggest that poetry expands our awareness and appreciation of the world? Does this mean that meaning in poetry is not inherent in the object described, but arises from the poet’s framing and the reader’s engagement? I also question how intentional these distortions need to be to create impact.
DKPhan Duy Khoi
I’m intrigued by the metaphor of poetry as alchemy. Does this imply that the poet’s skill lies in reshaping perception, turning ordinary or overlooked details into objects of wonder? How does this distortion of scale contribute to the imaginative or emotional resonance of a poem? I also wonder whether this approach applies to other art forms, like music or visual art, and whether the sense of transformation is central to creative expression in general.
TV40.Le Thao Vy
This quote makes me reflect on the transformative power of poetry. Is Morgan suggesting that poetry, like alchemy, changes perception rather than physical reality, allowing us to see the minute as monumental? I wonder how this ability to distort size and perspective affects emotional impact—does enlarging small moments make them more profound or relatable? Could this alchemical quality be what distinguishes poetry from straightforward description, offering a unique lens on human experience?