'Devdas' isn't a real film. It isn't in the same genre as Mira

'Devdas' isn't a real film. It isn't in the same genre as Mira

22/09/2025
22/09/2025

'Devdas' isn't a real film. It isn't in the same genre as Mira Nair's 'Monsoon Wedding,' where the camera's presence is so understated it almost disappears.

'Devdas' isn't a real film. It isn't in the same genre as Mira
'Devdas' isn't a real film. It isn't in the same genre as Mira
'Devdas' isn't a real film. It isn't in the same genre as Mira Nair's 'Monsoon Wedding,' where the camera's presence is so understated it almost disappears.
'Devdas' isn't a real film. It isn't in the same genre as Mira
'Devdas' isn't a real film. It isn't in the same genre as Mira Nair's 'Monsoon Wedding,' where the camera's presence is so understated it almost disappears.
'Devdas' isn't a real film. It isn't in the same genre as Mira
'Devdas' isn't a real film. It isn't in the same genre as Mira Nair's 'Monsoon Wedding,' where the camera's presence is so understated it almost disappears.
'Devdas' isn't a real film. It isn't in the same genre as Mira
'Devdas' isn't a real film. It isn't in the same genre as Mira Nair's 'Monsoon Wedding,' where the camera's presence is so understated it almost disappears.
'Devdas' isn't a real film. It isn't in the same genre as Mira
'Devdas' isn't a real film. It isn't in the same genre as Mira Nair's 'Monsoon Wedding,' where the camera's presence is so understated it almost disappears.
'Devdas' isn't a real film. It isn't in the same genre as Mira
'Devdas' isn't a real film. It isn't in the same genre as Mira Nair's 'Monsoon Wedding,' where the camera's presence is so understated it almost disappears.
'Devdas' isn't a real film. It isn't in the same genre as Mira
'Devdas' isn't a real film. It isn't in the same genre as Mira Nair's 'Monsoon Wedding,' where the camera's presence is so understated it almost disappears.
'Devdas' isn't a real film. It isn't in the same genre as Mira
'Devdas' isn't a real film. It isn't in the same genre as Mira Nair's 'Monsoon Wedding,' where the camera's presence is so understated it almost disappears.
'Devdas' isn't a real film. It isn't in the same genre as Mira
'Devdas' isn't a real film. It isn't in the same genre as Mira Nair's 'Monsoon Wedding,' where the camera's presence is so understated it almost disappears.
'Devdas' isn't a real film. It isn't in the same genre as Mira
'Devdas' isn't a real film. It isn't in the same genre as Mira
'Devdas' isn't a real film. It isn't in the same genre as Mira
'Devdas' isn't a real film. It isn't in the same genre as Mira
'Devdas' isn't a real film. It isn't in the same genre as Mira
'Devdas' isn't a real film. It isn't in the same genre as Mira
'Devdas' isn't a real film. It isn't in the same genre as Mira
'Devdas' isn't a real film. It isn't in the same genre as Mira
'Devdas' isn't a real film. It isn't in the same genre as Mira
'Devdas' isn't a real film. It isn't in the same genre as Mira

In the words of Sanjay Leela Bhansali—“‘Devdas’ isn’t a real film. It isn’t in the same genre as Mira Nair’s ‘Monsoon Wedding,’ where the camera’s presence is so understated it almost disappears.”—we hear a meditation on art itself, on how the gaze of the camera can either vanish into invisibility or blaze forth as a spectacle. For ‘Devdas’, in Bhansali’s vision, is no quiet mirror of life, but a heightened dream, a tapestry woven with color, music, and sorrow so great that reality itself gives way to myth.

The ancients knew this distinction between the real and the exalted. Consider the works of Euripides or Sophocles, whose tragedies did not aim to reflect life as it was, but to elevate it, turning the anguish of mortals into the song of gods. The stage was not invisible—it was thunderous, it was deliberate. In contrast, Mira Nair’s ‘Monsoon Wedding’ echoes the works of storytellers like Herodotus, who recorded life in its rawness, letting events speak for themselves. Thus Bhansali honors two paths: one of immersion, one of transcendence.

To say that ‘Devdas’ “isn’t a real film” is to declare it a vision beyond the ordinary. Like the frescoes of Michelangelo upon the Sistine Chapel, it is not meant to vanish, but to overwhelm, to make the viewer aware of the artist’s hand guiding every gesture. Bhansali’s world is not life as lived, but life magnified into legend—love, sorrow, and ruin shaped into mythic grandeur.

And yet, in ‘Monsoon Wedding’, the opposite path is walked. The camera, understated, disappears, letting the lives of ordinary people carry the story without adornment. This is the wisdom of humility, of capturing truth without interference, as though the storyteller were merely a witness, not a god. It is akin to the philosophy of Lao Tzu, who taught that the greatest ruler is the one whose presence is hardly felt, because the people believe they have acted of themselves.

Thus, Bhansali’s words remind us of two eternal ways of art: to vanish into the real, or to exalt into the mythical. Neither is lesser, but each serves a different hunger of the human soul. Sometimes we long for the quiet truth of life unshaped; sometimes we crave the grandeur of life transformed into legend. And in knowing this, we learn that art, like existence, holds many mirrors—some that show us ourselves plainly, and others that dazzle us with visions of who we might be.

Sanjay Leela Bhansali
Sanjay Leela Bhansali

Indian - Director Born: February 24, 1963

Tocpics Related
Notable authors
Have 5 Comment 'Devdas' isn't a real film. It isn't in the same genre as Mira

HVVAN NGUYEN HONG VAN

Sanjay Leela Bhansali’s comment about the difference between 'Devdas' and 'Monsoon Wedding' presents an interesting debate about how much the director’s style influences the perception of a film. The understated approach in 'Monsoon Wedding' contrasts sharply with the grandiose style of 'Devdas.' Which style of filmmaking do you think is more impactful in terms of storytelling? Can a more subtle approach be as powerful as a visually extravagant one?

Reply.
Information sender

TDTriet Doan

Sanjay Leela Bhansali's view on 'Devdas' being a film that isn’t quite 'real' compared to Mira Nair’s 'Monsoon Wedding' brings attention to how much of a role the camera can play in shaping a film. Does the more overt and stylized approach of 'Devdas' overshadow the narrative, or does it elevate the dramatic impact? Is there a way to balance spectacle with intimacy in modern filmmaking, or are these two styles inherently at odds?

Reply.
Information sender

TThien_Thanh

Bhansali's comparison of 'Devdas' and 'Monsoon Wedding' brings up an interesting point about how film can use camera presence to influence the audience. The larger-than-life spectacle of 'Devdas' contrasts sharply with the intimate, almost invisible direction of 'Monsoon Wedding.' Do you think the cinematic style influences how we perceive the story, or do we primarily connect with the characters and plot regardless of the camera's role?

Reply.
Information sender

KPBang Khanh Phan

The contrast between 'Devdas' and 'Monsoon Wedding' as discussed by Sanjay Leela Bhansali highlights different cinematic approaches. Bhansali’s comment suggests that 'Devdas' is more about the overwhelming presence of the camera, while 'Monsoon Wedding' prioritizes the story and characters. Which approach do you think resonates more with modern audiences? Does the subtlety in direction like Mira Nair’s work have a stronger emotional pull, or do grand visuals have more power in storytelling?

Reply.
Information sender

NHTrung Nguyen hoang

Sanjay Leela Bhansali's comparison of 'Devdas' with 'Monsoon Wedding' offers an interesting contrast in filmmaking style. Bhansali suggests that 'Devdas' is more about spectacle, while Mira Nair's approach is more subtle and intimate. It raises the question: which style creates a more lasting impact on the audience? Is the grandiosity of 'Devdas' more memorable, or does the understated presence in 'Monsoon Wedding' create a deeper emotional connection?

Reply.
Information sender
Leave the question
Click here to rate
Information sender