Freedom of opinion can only exist when the government thinks

Freedom of opinion can only exist when the government thinks

22/09/2025
24/10/2025

Freedom of opinion can only exist when the government thinks itself secure.

Freedom of opinion can only exist when the government thinks
Freedom of opinion can only exist when the government thinks
Freedom of opinion can only exist when the government thinks itself secure.
Freedom of opinion can only exist when the government thinks
Freedom of opinion can only exist when the government thinks itself secure.
Freedom of opinion can only exist when the government thinks
Freedom of opinion can only exist when the government thinks itself secure.
Freedom of opinion can only exist when the government thinks
Freedom of opinion can only exist when the government thinks itself secure.
Freedom of opinion can only exist when the government thinks
Freedom of opinion can only exist when the government thinks itself secure.
Freedom of opinion can only exist when the government thinks
Freedom of opinion can only exist when the government thinks itself secure.
Freedom of opinion can only exist when the government thinks
Freedom of opinion can only exist when the government thinks itself secure.
Freedom of opinion can only exist when the government thinks
Freedom of opinion can only exist when the government thinks itself secure.
Freedom of opinion can only exist when the government thinks
Freedom of opinion can only exist when the government thinks itself secure.
Freedom of opinion can only exist when the government thinks
Freedom of opinion can only exist when the government thinks
Freedom of opinion can only exist when the government thinks
Freedom of opinion can only exist when the government thinks
Freedom of opinion can only exist when the government thinks
Freedom of opinion can only exist when the government thinks
Freedom of opinion can only exist when the government thinks
Freedom of opinion can only exist when the government thinks
Freedom of opinion can only exist when the government thinks
Freedom of opinion can only exist when the government thinks

Host: The night was dense and heavy, like a curtain of smoke pulled over the city. From the windows of a half-empty diner, the fluorescent lights buzzed like tired insects, their pale glow spilling onto chrome stools and cracked tiles. Outside, the rain painted the streets in glossy ribbons of yellow light and reflected sirens.

Inside, Jack sat near the window, his grey eyes tracing the blurred shapes of passing cars. A newspaper, folded and damp, lay beside his coffee cup, its headline shouting in bold letters: Government Tightens Control on Public Speech.

Jeeny entered moments later, her coat damp, her hair dripping faintly. She slid into the booth across from him, her eyes alive with a quiet, simmering fire. Between them lay the quote Jack had just underlined from an old book of philosophy:
Freedom of opinion can only exist when the government thinks itself secure.” — Bertrand Russell

Jeeny’s voice was low, almost trembling, as she spoke.

Jeeny: “So that’s it, then? We only get to speak freely when those in power feel safe enough to let us?”

Host: Jack didn’t look up immediately. The rain outside tapped steadily on the window, like an anxious heartbeat.

Jack: “That’s how it’s always been, Jeeny. A government, like a man with a loaded gun, loosens his grip only when he’s sure no one will pull their own trigger. Russell just said what history has proven.”

Jeeny: “Then what kind of freedom is that? Conditional? Freedom on a leash? It sounds like permission, not liberty.”

Host: Jack’s mouth twisted slightly, his voice calm but edged with steel.

Jack: “Freedom is never free. It’s an arrangement—a fragile contract between power and peace. You can’t expect a government at war, or one crumbling from within, to let everyone shout what they please.”

Jeeny: “That’s exactly when voices are needed most, Jack! When power is afraid—that’s when truth matters. Silence in those moments isn’t peace; it’s surrender.”

Host: The lights flickered once, dimming. The sound of a train horn in the distance cut through the humid air, long and mournful.

Jack: “You speak like freedom is a moral constant. But it’s not. It’s situational. It depends on security, on stability. Without that, you get chaos—anarchy disguised as expression.”

Jeeny: “And you think that’s worse than suppression?”

Jack: “Sometimes. Look around the world. When governments fall apart—Somalia in the ’90s, Libya after Gaddafi, Syria—people could say whatever they wanted, but there was no one left to listen. No order, no trust, no safety. Freedom of opinion means nothing if you can’t live long enough to express it.”

Host: Jeeny leaned in, her eyes dark, her hands trembling slightly, not from fear, but fury.

Jeeny: “And yet, when governments are secure, they grow arrogant. They let people talk only to maintain the illusion of control. The security you praise is often built on silence. You call it peace—I call it obedience.”

Jack: “You’re mistaking cynicism for clarity.”

Jeeny: “No. I’m calling out the price of comfort. You want the kind of freedom that doesn’t threaten anything. But true freedom always threatens something.”

Host: The waitress passed by, refilling their cups, her eyes tired but curious. A radio near the counter played faint news about new protest laws, the words blurring into static.

Jack: “You talk as if rebellion and freedom are the same thing. They’re not. Russell understood that freedom isn’t just about what you can say—it’s about what the system can withstand. If the structure breaks, everyone loses.”

Jeeny: “Tell that to Mandela, to Martin Luther King, to the students in Tiananmen Square. They spoke when the system said don’t. If they waited for governments to feel secure, they’d still be in chains.”

Host: Jack’s jaw tightened, his fingers tapping against the table. The steam from his coffee rose between them like a thin wall.

Jack: “And many of them died, Jeeny. You call it courage; I call it tragedy. Change needs voices, yes—but it also needs systems that can absorb those voices without collapsing. That’s what Russell meant. Freedom can’t live in fear—on either side.”

Jeeny: “Then maybe the goal isn’t to make the government feel secure, but to make it unnecessary. To build a society where freedom doesn’t depend on someone’s confidence in their power.”

Host: A brief silence fell. Outside, the rain had slowed to a soft mist, and a police car rolled by, its lights flashing but its siren silent—a quiet kind of warning.

Jack: “That’s idealism, Jeeny. Beautiful, but naïve. People crave order. Even revolutionaries build governments once the chaos settles. And once they do, they start fearing the same freedom they once fought for.”

Jeeny: “Because power corrupts. Not because freedom is dangerous.”

Jack: “Power doesn’t corrupt—it protects itself. There’s a difference. It’s like a body’s immune system—it fights anything that threatens its integrity. Including dissent.”

Jeeny: “Then freedom is the fever that reminds the body it’s still alive.”

Host: Jack’s eyes flickered, a spark of reluctant admiration breaking through his cool expression.

Jack: “That’s poetic, I’ll give you that. But tell me—how long can a fever burn before it kills the host?”

Jeeny: “Maybe it has to burn, Jack. Maybe that’s the price of evolution.”

Host: The diner hummed around them—the faint buzz of lights, the clatter of dishes, the murmur of a few late-night souls trying to forget the world outside.

Jack: “You always chase purity, Jeeny. But the world doesn’t run on ideals. It runs on negotiations. On fear, and compromise, and the quiet machinery of survival. Freedom of opinion exists not because it’s moral—but because it’s tolerated.”

Jeeny: “And tolerance is the counterfeit of respect. They let us talk, Jack, but only if it’s safe talk—only if it changes nothing. The moment words start to matter, they stop being tolerated.”

Host: Jack looked at her, really looked this time. The lamplight above them buzzed softly, turning her eyes to dark pools of conviction.

Jack: “You make it sound hopeless.”

Jeeny: “Not hopeless. Just fragile. Like glass—it shines only because it can shatter.”

Host: Jack sighed, his fingers curling around his cup, the heat sinking into his skin.

Jack: “So maybe freedom isn’t meant to be permanent. Maybe it’s something we keep rebuilding every time it’s taken away. Governments secure it, people challenge it, and somewhere in between, humanity keeps breathing.”

Jeeny: “Then maybe that’s the only real security there is—the balance between fear and courage.”

Host: A smile ghosted across Jack’s face, faint, genuine.

Jack: “You always find a way to make my cynicism sound poetic.”

Jeeny: “And you always find a way to make my faith sound foolish.”

Host: They both laughed softly, the sound cutting through the hollow silence of the diner. Outside, the rain stopped completely. The streetlights glowed against the wet pavement, where puddles mirrored fragments of the city—light, dark, reflection, truth.

Jack: “Maybe Russell was right in one sense. Freedom of opinion can only exist when power feels secure. But maybe the greater truth is this: power never feels secure forever.”

Jeeny: “Which means freedom never dies—it just waits.”

Host: The camera lingered on their faces—Jack’s tired realism, Jeeny’s burning conviction—and then slowly panned to the window, where the first light of dawn began to pierce the night fog. The sky was turning from iron to amber, soft and uncertain, like a truth still deciding if it should speak.

The rain had ended. The city exhaled. And somewhere between security and freedom, two souls found a fragile, necessary peace.

Bertrand Russell
Bertrand Russell

British - Philosopher May 18, 1872 - February 2, 1970

Tocpics Related
Notable authors
Have 0 Comment Freedom of opinion can only exist when the government thinks

AAdministratorAdministrator

Welcome, honored guests. Please leave a comment, we will respond soon

Reply.
Information sender
Leave the question
Click here to rate
Information sender