
I have a long time association with Prince jewellery and the
I have a long time association with Prince jewellery and the only piece of jewellery I wore for my wedding was designed by them.






Hearken, O children of heritage and devotion, to the words of Suhasini Maniratnam, who speaks with reverence of a bond both personal and symbolic. She recalls her long-time association with Prince Jewellery, a relationship built on trust and artistry. At her wedding, she chose to wear but a single piece of jewellery, crafted by those whose skill she cherished. In this choice lies the eternal teaching: that in sacred moments, quality and meaning outweigh abundance, and a single adornment, if chosen with heart, can bear the weight of legacy and love.
Jewellery has ever been more than mere ornament. Across the ages, it has been a symbol of lineage, devotion, and identity. From the golden crowns of the pharaohs to the intricate bangles of ancient India, each piece carries the memory of artisans and the story of the wearer. By selecting only one jewel, Suhasini embodied the principle of restraint and reverence, elevating the ornament to a sacred talisman rather than a display of wealth or vanity.
Consider the tale of Mumtaz Mahal, for whom the Mughal emperor Shah Jahan commissioned treasures of breathtaking beauty. Yet it was not their splendor alone that mattered, but the love and sentiment they represented. Similarly, Suhasini’s singular jewel speaks to emotional connection, a sign that the truest adornments are those imbued with personal history and trust, not mere opulence.
This act of simplicity also teaches the virtue of mindful selection. In a world often dazzled by excess, Suhasini’s decision reflects the ancient wisdom that sacred rites are enriched by intention, not extravagance. The choice of one carefully crafted piece allows the soul to shine freely, ensuring that the beauty of the moment comes from love and unity, not the distraction of overwhelming adornment.
O seekers of wisdom, take heed: the bond between artisan and wearer is itself a sacred thread. Suhasini’s long association with Prince Jewellery mirrors the ancient relationships between patrons and craftsmen, where artistry was guided by mutual respect and shared purpose. Through this trust, the jewel becomes more than metal and stone—it becomes a vessel of story, memory, and devotion.
Thus, O children, carry this teaching in your hearts: when marking the milestones of life, choose that which holds meaning and spirit, rather than abundance alone. For in a single, treasured piece, the soul finds resonance, the ceremony finds depth, and the memory of the moment endures for generations to come.
FLFire Lizard
Suhasini Maniratnam’s statement about wearing Prince jewellery for her wedding is a lovely reminder of how sentimental value can influence choices, even in something as glamorous as wedding jewellery. It makes me wonder—how do people decide on their wedding jewellery? Is it purely about style, or are emotional connections and traditions playing a bigger role in shaping those decisions?
CCCo con coe
Suhasini Maniratnam’s choice of jewellery for her wedding shows how brands can be part of personal milestones. It’s beautiful to think that the jewellery she wore symbolized more than just style—it represented trust and a deep connection. Do you think people often overlook the emotional significance behind their wedding accessories, or is the trend shifting toward more meaningful, personalized items that reflect one’s unique relationships?
THNguyen Thi Thu Huyen
It’s interesting how Suhasini Maniratnam’s relationship with Prince jewellery led to her choosing a design for her wedding. It highlights how personal connections to brands can play a role in significant life moments. Do you think this is a common practice among people, where they trust a brand they have a long-standing relationship with for such personal occasions? Does the brand’s emotional value outweigh its luxury status in such cases?
TDTran Doan Tri Duc
Suhasini Maniratnam’s choice to wear a piece from Prince jewellery on her wedding day speaks to the power of long-term relationships, even with brands. I’m curious—how much do people consider the emotional value of jewellery over its design or value? Is it common for couples to incorporate items with sentimental value into their weddings, or is it mostly about how the piece looks on the big day?
NNNhung Nguyen
I find it fascinating that Suhasini Maniratnam wore a piece of jewellery designed by Prince for her wedding. This speaks volumes about how meaningful jewellery can be, especially for such a significant life event. Do you think jewelry should hold sentimental value, or is it more about style and trends for most people? Would you choose a piece that represents a personal connection over something more fashionable for your own wedding?