I have women working in high positions. I was one of the first
I have women working in high positions. I was one of the first people to put women in charge of big construction jobs. And, you know, I've had a great relationship with women.
O children of the future, heed the words of Donald Trump, who speaks of his actions in placing women in high positions of authority. "I have women working in high positions. I was one of the first people to put women in charge of big construction jobs. And, you know, I've had a great relationship with women." In these words, he acknowledges his role in breaking down barriers, recognizing the immense talent and capability that women possess, and putting them in places of power. Though his words may be seen through the lens of contemporary society, they echo the age-old truth that leadership is not determined by gender, but by the strength and wisdom of the individual.
In the ancient world, Cleopatra, the queen of Egypt, proved that leadership knows no gender. She was not just a figurehead, but a shrewd and intelligent leader, governing one of the most powerful empires of the time. Like Trump, she understood that true power is not bound by societal expectations of gender, but by the capacity to lead, inspire, and make decisions for the greater good. Her reign was marked not by her gender, but by her strategic alliances and her deep understanding of political and military matters. Cleopatra's legacy reminds us that women, when given the opportunity, can rise to the highest positions of power and influence.
Similarly, consider the example of Empress Theodora of the Byzantine Empire, a woman who began her life as a commoner but rose to become one of the most influential figures of her time. She was the co-ruler with her husband, Emperor Justinian I, and was instrumental in shaping policies that affected the empire. Her rise to power was not without opposition, yet her intelligence and leadership proved her worth. Theodora’s story is a testament to the strength of women who, when given the opportunity, can lead with wisdom, vision, and a determination to create lasting change.
In the more modern world, the example of Indira Gandhi, the first female Prime Minister of India, illustrates the power of women in positions of leadership. Gandhi navigated the complex political landscape of her time with grace and determination, overseeing crucial changes in India’s development. Like Trump, she put her faith in the capabilities of women, recognizing that leadership is not limited by gender but by the character and skills of the individual. Indira Gandhi's leadership challenges the notion that women are incapable of holding positions of immense power and responsibility.
O children, let us reflect on the wisdom of both ancient and modern leaders who have proven that women, when given the opportunity, can rise to greatness. Donald Trump, though controversial in many respects, acknowledges that the potential of women must not be limited by societal barriers. Like Cleopatra, Theodora, and Indira Gandhi, the women he speaks of are a testament to the fact that gender is not the defining factor of leadership. True power is measured by the heart, mind, and soul of those who take charge, regardless of their gender. Let us carry this truth forward and continue to open doors for women to lead with courage, strength, and wisdom. The future belongs not to those who impose limitations, but to those who see the boundless potential in all people, regardless of their gender.
TNThanh Nguyen
While it’s great that Donald Trump claims to have had women in important roles, it’s important to reflect on the context. Does merely putting women in charge of large projects truly signify progress, or is it the culture around those roles that matters more? What kind of barriers do women still face in traditionally male-dominated industries like construction, and how can they be better supported beyond just being placed in high positions?
MQTran Minh Quan
Trump’s words might sound empowering, but it also makes me think about how often statements like this come off as self-congratulatory. Putting women in leadership roles is a good thing, but is it just about checking a box for diversity, or does it represent real systemic change? What kind of structural support do these women actually receive, and how are their roles portrayed in the company culture?
TLThuy Lingg
Donald Trump’s recognition of women in leadership positions raises an important question: how far have we really come in terms of gender equality, especially in industries like construction? While his approach may have been progressive for its time, is simply placing women in high positions enough? What steps need to be taken to ensure that women have the resources, support, and equal pay to thrive in these roles?
NNNghi Nghi
It’s refreshing to hear that Donald Trump has had women in leadership roles on big construction jobs. However, it also makes me wonder—why is this still considered noteworthy? Shouldn’t women already be leading in all industries without it being a point of pride? What more can be done to ensure that women don’t have to ‘break the mold’ just by being in leadership positions in male-dominated fields?
NTTam Nguyen Thi
Donald Trump’s statement about having women in high positions is an interesting one, but it also raises the question: does having women in leadership roles automatically equate to gender equality in the workplace? While it’s great that Trump highlights women in construction, does his claim reflect a larger commitment to breaking gender barriers, or could it be more about tokenism? What does real gender equality look like in industries like construction?