I love both real and fake jewelry. My kids make me necklaces
I love both real and fake jewelry. My kids make me necklaces, and I wear those, too. Every day, I wear my gold wedding band and the Cartier watch my husband gave me.
In the words of Aerin Lauder, we hear the voice of one who has discovered that the worth of adornment lies not in its price, but in its meaning. She declares her love for both real and fake jewelry, treasures crafted by her children as much as those shaped by goldsmiths. She wears her gold wedding band each day, alongside the Cartier watch gifted by her husband, affirming that jewels become sacred not through metal or stone alone, but through the hands and hearts from which they come.
The ancients knew this truth as well. Among the Romans, emperors wore crowns of laurel leaves—simple, perishable garlands that carried greater honor than crowns of gold, for they symbolized victory and the people’s acclaim. Just so, a necklace made by a child may outshine diamonds, for its value rests not in rarity but in love. Lauder’s embrace of both the precious and the playful reveals wisdom: adornment is not vanity, but memory worn upon the body.
Her words also teach us about balance. The wedding band represents covenant, a vow eternal and unbroken. The Cartier watch represents devotion, a gift of time itself, reminding her of love given freely. The necklaces made by her children represent innocence, creativity, and the fleeting joys of youth. Together, they form not a clash, but a harmony: life’s treasures, from the humblest to the finest, woven into a single story.
History offers its reflection in the tale of Queen Victoria, who, though adorned with jewels of empire, cherished most the simple trinkets given to her by her children. These small tokens, often made of scraps or humble materials, were preserved in her private collection, for to her they carried more power than all the diamonds of state. Like Victoria, Lauder reminds us that jewelry is not measured by carats, but by love.
Therefore, let it be remembered: the greatest ornaments are those that bind the heart. Real or fake, gold or string, wedding band or child’s necklace—all become priceless when they carry love, memory, and devotion. Lauder’s words carry the lesson that true beauty lies not in wealth displayed, but in meaning cherished. For when we wear love upon our bodies, we carry with us the richest adornment of all.
HGHan Gia
I find Aerin Lauder’s love for both real and fake jewelry so intriguing. It highlights how fashion can be about more than just luxury—it can also be a way to express personal connections. Her Cartier watch and wedding band clearly hold special meaning, but the fact that she wears her kids’ handmade necklaces too makes it all the more personal. Do you think society values expensive jewelry too much, or do you think personal, sentimental pieces are starting to take center stage?
KNNguyen thi khanh Ngoc
It’s so heartwarming that Aerin Lauder wears jewelry that holds personal meaning, like the necklaces her kids make and her gold wedding band. It shows that the value of something isn’t always about how much it costs, but about the memories and emotions attached to it. Do you think people are too focused on expensive items when it comes to fashion and jewelry, or do you think more people are embracing meaningful, personal gifts?
UGUser Google
Aerin Lauder’s approach to jewelry is so relatable. While she loves her luxury pieces like the Cartier watch, the fact that she wears the necklaces her kids make for her shows that sentimental value can mean just as much, if not more. It makes me wonder—should we place so much emphasis on expensive items, or are the homemade, personal gifts the ones that truly carry the most significance?
UGUser Google
I love how Aerin Lauder talks about wearing both real and fake jewelry. It’s such a refreshing perspective because it shows that value isn’t always tied to price or brand. The necklaces her kids make for her must hold so much sentimental value. Do you think jewelry should always be about luxury, or can it be more meaningful when it’s tied to personal connections and memories?