I think a perfect wedding would be where only your close family
Disha Parmar, with a voice of simplicity and truth, declared: “I think a perfect wedding would be where only your close family and friends are there.” In these words, she lifts the veil of extravagance and shows the essence of celebration — that love need not be displayed before the multitude, but honored among those who hold the heart dearest. For what makes a union sacred is not the number of eyes upon it, but the presence of souls who truly belong.
The ancients, too, knew this wisdom. In villages and clans, a wedding was not for spectacle but for unity — the joining not just of two hearts, but of two families, witnessed by those whose lives would be woven into the new bond. The strength of the ceremony lay not in gold or grandeur, but in the warmth of community. Parmar’s words echo this ancient truth: that the perfect wedding is not measured by size, but by sincerity.
History gives us the story of Mahatma Gandhi, whose own wedding as a boy was marked not by opulence but by simplicity. Though bound in youthful custom, his ceremony was a quiet affair of kin and neighbors, a gathering small yet meaningful. Later in life, Gandhi became a voice for simplicity itself, teaching that excess distracts from what is real. In the same way, Parmar reminds us that the heart of a union is best preserved when stripped of noise and left to shine in intimacy.
Her reflection also warns against the trappings of society. Many seek to make their wedding vast and magnificent, to impress strangers more than to honor love. Yet such grandeur often breeds stress, debt, and distraction, leaving the couple weary instead of joyous. To choose closeness over spectacle is to guard the sanctity of the day, keeping it a memory of love, not of burden.
Let the generations remember: the perfect wedding is not the loudest, but the truest. It is the laughter of friends, the blessings of family, and the quiet strength of love that matters most. As Disha Parmar teaches, when a union is witnessed by those who matter, it is already complete — needing no grandeur, for it is crowned instead with sincerity, intimacy, and eternal joy.
MCChien Manh Chien
Disha’s vision of a perfect wedding is simple yet meaningful. It’s a good reminder that sometimes less is more when it comes to celebrating important moments. But why do you think society tends to push for larger weddings? Is it because of tradition, or the desire to impress others? Would a more intimate celebration help people focus on the real essence of marriage rather than the event itself?
LKLinh Khanh
I really like Disha’s take on weddings. It’s easy to get caught up in the idea of having a big celebration, but when it comes down to it, isn’t it about sharing the moment with those who truly know and love you? How do you think this mindset influences how people view their wedding day? Shouldn’t the focus be on the experience and relationships, rather than the scale of the celebration?
ANanh nguyen
Disha’s idea of a perfect wedding sounds so refreshing. The focus on close family and friends makes the event feel more personal and meaningful. I wonder, though, how many couples today feel pressured to invite large numbers of people to meet social expectations. Do you think there’s a trend towards more intimate weddings, or is the pressure to host extravagant events still too strong?
HXPhan hong Xuyen
I completely agree with Disha’s perspective on a perfect wedding. It’s so much more meaningful when it’s a more intimate gathering with the people who truly matter. Do you think weddings have become too big and extravagant? It’s interesting to consider whether the bigger, more public celebrations sometimes take away from the personal connection and focus on the couple. Could a smaller wedding be just as memorable, if not more?