I write the occasional poem. I think my dabbling in poetry makes
I write the occasional poem. I think my dabbling in poetry makes me better at screenplays. Poetry teaches the value of condensing, the importance of talking in a few words.
Hear the words of Kamal Haasan, artist and visionary, who declared: “I write the occasional poem. I think my dabbling in poetry makes me better at screenplays. Poetry teaches the value of condensing, the importance of talking in a few words.” In these lines lies the recognition of the ancient bond between forms of art—that the discipline of one strengthens the mastery of another. For poetry, with its brevity and fire, shapes the soul to speak with precision, while screenplays, vast in scope, demand that same power to convey entire worlds with but a few lines. To learn the art of few words is to wield the power of many.
The ancients knew the sacred art of condensation. The oracle at Delphi spoke not in essays, but in fragments—short utterances that carried the weight of eternity. The Psalms of David, often but a few lines, spoke more profoundly than long speeches. The haiku of Japan, small as a breath, revealed entire universes of image and meaning. In every culture, the shortest forms were the sharpest, for they stripped away excess until only truth remained. Haasan recognizes this: that the poet, trained in cutting words to their essence, becomes a master of all other forms of storytelling.
Consider the words of Shakespeare, who was both poet and playwright. His sonnets honed his ability to compress passion and philosophy into fourteen lines, and this sharpened his dramas, where every line carried weight. When Hamlet asks, “To be or not to be,” it is poetry—condensed thought, vast in meaning. Without poetry’s discipline, the plays would swell with excess. With it, they cut into the soul. So too does Haasan remind us that the artist who learns brevity learns greatness.
The origin of his saying lies in the practical demands of art itself. A screenplay is not the space for endless words—it is a vessel where image, dialogue, and silence must balance. To say too much is to weaken the story; to say just enough is to make it powerful. Poetry, then, is the crucible where the artist learns this restraint. The poet cannot wander; the poet must condense. In this way, dabbling in poetry teaches any creator the discipline of clarity.
This teaching carries a lesson for all who create, not only for writers. In life itself, as in art, too many words cloud meaning. A speech may dazzle, but a single sincere sentence may heal. A flood of explanations may confuse, but one quiet phrase may guide. The one who learns to condense, to speak with the power of fewer words, will reach hearts more deeply than the one who spills endlessly. Poetry is not only an art—it is a teacher of discipline, clarity, and focus.
The lesson is clear: if you would master communication, learn poetry. Not necessarily to publish or to perform, but to train the mind to cut away the excess and the heart to speak with sincerity. For in poetry we learn to weigh every word, to let silence carry weight, to honor the power of the unsaid. And these lessons apply not only to writing, but to speaking, to living, to loving. To condense is to honor the listener, to trust the power of simplicity.
Practical steps follow. Try writing a poem each day, even if brief, to discipline your tongue and sharpen your thoughts. In conversation, practice saying what is essential, not what is endless. In storytelling, let images speak as much as words. In your life, honor the value of silence as much as speech. For the one who learns to condense not only speaks more powerfully, but also lives more wisely.
Thus Kamal Haasan’s words endure: poetry teaches the value of condensing, the importance of talking in a few words. To learn poetry is to learn power. To master brevity is to master depth. Let us then practice this discipline, so that our words, like the words of poets and prophets before us, may not scatter like dust, but strike like arrows into the hearts of those who hear them.
UGUser Google
I find Kamal Haasan’s thoughts on poetry and screenwriting really interesting. The idea that poetry teaches the value of condensing seems to suggest that being succinct is a key skill for any form of writing. But how does this translate into the visual medium of screenwriting? Can the principles of poetry truly teach us how to craft compelling stories visually, or does screenwriting require its own unique approach to brevity and storytelling?
HNNguyen Hong Nhung
Kamal Haasan’s idea that writing poetry can improve screenwriting is a fascinating perspective. Poetry does force you to choose words carefully, but how far can that technique really carry over? In screenwriting, it's not just the words that matter—it's how those words fit into a visual story. Can one truly become better at screenwriting just by dabbling in poetry, or does screenwriting demand a more technical set of skills that poetry doesn't address?
DPMinh Duc Pham
This quote really makes me think about the relationship between different forms of writing. Poetry and screenplays both require precision, but in such different ways. While poetry distills emotion and meaning into a few words, screenwriting has to balance that with visual cues and character development. Can the practice of writing poetry truly prepare someone for screenwriting, or is it just one of many tools that can help in the creative process?
CNDang Tran Cao Nhat
I love how Kamal Haasan connects poetry with screenwriting. The idea that poetry teaches brevity and clarity in communication is so valuable, especially in screenwriting where every word counts. But how often do we see screenwriters fall into the trap of over-explaining or over-complicating things? Can the simplicity of poetry really be transferred into the world of film, where visual storytelling also plays such a huge role?
HHHung Huynh
Kamal Haasan’s reflection on poetry and screenwriting is insightful. He highlights how the conciseness required in poetry can enhance the ability to write screenplays. I wonder, though, if this skill can be applied to other forms of writing. Could other short-form writing genres, like essays or articles, benefit from the same economy of words? Or is it the specific nature of poetry that truly teaches this skill of condensing thought?