
If we wish to know the force of human genius, we should read
If we wish to know the force of human genius, we should read Shakespeare. If we wish to see the insignificance of human learning, we may study his commentators.






There are few minds in history who saw with as fierce a clarity as William Hazlitt, the English essayist whose pen cut through illusion to reveal the living heart of truth. He once wrote: “If we wish to know the force of human genius, we should read Shakespeare. If we wish to see the insignificance of human learning, we may study his commentators.” In this single stroke, Hazlitt divides the world of creation from the world of imitation, reminding us that genius is not born from accumulation, but from inspiration — that true understanding springs from the fire of the soul, not the dust of libraries. His words echo through time as both admiration for greatness and warning against the sterility of those who analyze but never create.
The meaning of Hazlitt’s quote lies in the eternal contrast between creative power and intellectual dissection. Shakespeare, in his vision, embodied the boundless vitality of human imagination. He did not learn greatness from others; he breathed it. His plays revealed every shade of humanity — love and ambition, jealousy and mercy, laughter and death — all not as theories but as living forces. His genius transcended the systems and categories that scholars later tried to impose upon him. Yet, when Hazlitt looked upon the endless commentaries written about Shakespeare — those who sought to explain, classify, and confine his art — he saw the limits of learning without imagination. For no matter how refined the intellect, it pales beside the spontaneous creation of a true artist’s spirit.
The origin of this thought arises from Hazlitt’s deep reverence for the creative individual. Living in an age when scholarship often sought to replace inspiration with structure, he rebelled against the growing worship of academic interpretation. To him, Shakespeare represented the pinnacle of natural genius — a man whose insight into the human condition required no scholarly scaffolding. His works were not crafted by formula, but by intuition. Hazlitt saw in this a divine spark: that the mind touched by imagination becomes a force of nature itself, while the mind shackled by over-analysis becomes a mirror that reflects light, but never produces it.
This truth has echoed throughout history. Consider Leonardo da Vinci, who, without formal training, sketched the anatomy of man, the mechanics of flight, and the mysteries of water centuries before science could explain them. His genius was not learned but lived. And yet, countless scholars after him spent lifetimes studying his notebooks, attempting to decode what he simply understood. So it is with Shakespeare and his commentators. The difference between genius and learning is the difference between the lightning and the lantern: one strikes from heaven in a moment of revelation, the other merely borrows and stores what it can.
Hazlitt’s insight also exposes the vanity of those who believe that knowledge alone confers greatness. There are men who read deeply, yet understand little — who fill their minds with facts but leave their souls untouched. Genius, by contrast, is living knowledge — not memorized truth, but awakened vision. The scholar may know every word Shakespeare wrote; the genius feels what Shakespeare meant. The scholar may build arguments around a line; the genius sees the heartbeat of humanity within it. To know about a thing is one level; to become one with it through insight is another entirely. Hazlitt calls us to remember that the latter is where greatness resides.
And yet, his words are not a condemnation of learning, but a call to revive its spirit. For learning, when united with imagination, becomes wisdom. The problem is not study itself, but the kind of study that replaces creation with commentary, curiosity with criticism. The true student must approach genius not as a surgeon dissects a corpse, but as a pilgrim enters a sacred temple — with reverence, humility, and a desire to be changed. To “study Shakespeare” rightly is not to explain him, but to listen, to let his words open the hidden chambers of our own hearts.
Let this be the lesson, then: seek not only to learn, but to create; not only to understand, but to feel. Knowledge is the soil, but imagination is the seed — without it, nothing grows. Do not spend your life commenting on the greatness of others; find within yourself the spark that kindles greatness anew. Read Shakespeare, yes — but read him not to quote, but to awaken. For as William Hazlitt teaches, the true measure of the human mind lies not in how well it analyzes genius, but in how deeply it dares to become one.
AAdministratorAdministrator
Welcome, honored guests. Please leave a comment, we will respond soon