If you go into a bar in most places in America and even say the

If you go into a bar in most places in America and even say the

22/09/2025
18/10/2025

If you go into a bar in most places in America and even say the word poetry, you'll probably get beaten up. But poetry is a really strong, beautiful form to me, and a lot of innovation in language comes from poetry.

If you go into a bar in most places in America and even say the
If you go into a bar in most places in America and even say the
If you go into a bar in most places in America and even say the word poetry, you'll probably get beaten up. But poetry is a really strong, beautiful form to me, and a lot of innovation in language comes from poetry.
If you go into a bar in most places in America and even say the
If you go into a bar in most places in America and even say the word poetry, you'll probably get beaten up. But poetry is a really strong, beautiful form to me, and a lot of innovation in language comes from poetry.
If you go into a bar in most places in America and even say the
If you go into a bar in most places in America and even say the word poetry, you'll probably get beaten up. But poetry is a really strong, beautiful form to me, and a lot of innovation in language comes from poetry.
If you go into a bar in most places in America and even say the
If you go into a bar in most places in America and even say the word poetry, you'll probably get beaten up. But poetry is a really strong, beautiful form to me, and a lot of innovation in language comes from poetry.
If you go into a bar in most places in America and even say the
If you go into a bar in most places in America and even say the word poetry, you'll probably get beaten up. But poetry is a really strong, beautiful form to me, and a lot of innovation in language comes from poetry.
If you go into a bar in most places in America and even say the
If you go into a bar in most places in America and even say the word poetry, you'll probably get beaten up. But poetry is a really strong, beautiful form to me, and a lot of innovation in language comes from poetry.
If you go into a bar in most places in America and even say the
If you go into a bar in most places in America and even say the word poetry, you'll probably get beaten up. But poetry is a really strong, beautiful form to me, and a lot of innovation in language comes from poetry.
If you go into a bar in most places in America and even say the
If you go into a bar in most places in America and even say the word poetry, you'll probably get beaten up. But poetry is a really strong, beautiful form to me, and a lot of innovation in language comes from poetry.
If you go into a bar in most places in America and even say the
If you go into a bar in most places in America and even say the word poetry, you'll probably get beaten up. But poetry is a really strong, beautiful form to me, and a lot of innovation in language comes from poetry.
If you go into a bar in most places in America and even say the
If you go into a bar in most places in America and even say the
If you go into a bar in most places in America and even say the
If you go into a bar in most places in America and even say the
If you go into a bar in most places in America and even say the
If you go into a bar in most places in America and even say the
If you go into a bar in most places in America and even say the
If you go into a bar in most places in America and even say the
If you go into a bar in most places in America and even say the
If you go into a bar in most places in America and even say the

“If you go into a bar in most places in America and even say the word poetry, you'll probably get beaten up. But poetry is a really strong, beautiful form to me, and a lot of innovation in language comes from poetry.” So speaks Jim Jarmusch, the filmmaker who walks between the realms of the ordinary and the dreamlike. His words echo the tension between a world that scorns the delicate and a truth that proclaims the delicate as a source of strength. It is an ancient conflict: the crowd mocks what it does not understand, and the wise man defends what cannot be destroyed.

The meaning of this saying rests on two pillars: first, the disdain that society often shows toward the subtle power of art, and second, the unyielding truth that poetry—despite mockery, despite rejection—remains a fountain of strength and renewal. In the barrooms of the world, men may raise fists against the word poetry, seeing it as weakness. Yet in the chambers of history, it is poetry that has carried the memory of nations, the grief of widows, the courage of warriors, and the secret of lovers. Mocked in the moment, revered in eternity.

Let us remember the tale of Wilfred Owen, the soldier-poet of the Great War. In the trenches of France, amidst mud and fire, he wrote verses that revealed the truth of horror and the dignity of the fallen. Soldiers beside him might have laughed at a man writing lines instead of brandishing bayonets—but today, Owen’s poems endure, while the mockers’ names are lost to dust. This is Jarmusch’s teaching: poetry is not weakness, but the enduring flame that keeps truth alive when swords are broken and cities are ash.

The origin of this sentiment lies in a culture that often prizes the practical, the rugged, and the unadorned above all else. In America especially, where barroom bravado and frontier toughness shape identity, the word poetry may seem out of place. Yet Jarmusch insists on its necessity, reminding us that innovation in language—the very lifeblood of storytelling, culture, and even cinema—springs from the daring experiments of poets. The new ways of seeing, the new ways of speaking, they all begin in the forge of verse.

Here, too, is a paradox: society yearns for progress, for innovation, for words that stir the soul, yet scorns the very soil from which these things arise. It is like a man who curses the well from which he drinks, not knowing that without its waters he will perish. The poet is often exiled, yet his exile becomes the seedbed of transformation. From Homer to Whitman, from Sappho to Ginsberg, the world has been reshaped by the words once thought fragile, strange, or dangerous.

The lesson is clear: do not be ashamed of beauty in a world that scorns it. To love poetry, or art, or any form of gentle creation, is not weakness—it is courage. For it is easy to join the chorus of laughter in the bar, but it is harder to stand alone, holding fast to that which is unseen yet eternal. Those who endure this mockery, as Jarmusch does, align themselves with the lineage of all creators who refused to bow to the ignorance of the crowd.

To you who hear these words: embrace poetry in whatever form it comes to you. Read it aloud, write it in secret, carry it in your heart. Let it shape your language, for in your language lies your power to shape the world. When others scoff, remember that their scoffing is a passing sound, but your words, if born of truth, may ripple through generations. Do not fear the blows of the ignorant; fear instead the silence of a soul that never dares to sing.

And so let the teaching stand: though you may be laughed at, mocked, or even struck down for speaking the language of beauty, hold fast. For as rivers cut through stone and stars endure through night, so too will poetry carve its way into the marrow of the world. The bar may jeer, but the future will remember the poet.

Jim Jarmusch
Jim Jarmusch

American - Director Born: January 22, 1953

Tocpics Related
Notable authors
Have 5 Comment If you go into a bar in most places in America and even say the

YNYen Nhi

Reading this, I’m struck by the juxtaposition of risk and beauty in poetry. Does Jarmusch imply that the very elements of poetry that make it strong and innovative also provoke discomfort in audiences? I also question how cultural attitudes toward poetry affect its evolution and relevance. Can the perception of poetry as ‘dangerous’ or confrontational inspire poets to push linguistic boundaries, thereby reinforcing the vitality and transformative potential that he celebrates?

Reply.
Information sender

HDHanh Duong

This quote makes me reflect on the relationship between societal perception and artistic influence. Why does Jarmusch perceive poetry as threatening to conventional sensibilities, and how does this relate to its power and innovation? I also wonder whether the marginalization of poetry contributes to its role as a laboratory for linguistic and cultural experimentation. Could the resistance he describes be a sign that poetry is challenging norms in ways that other art forms do not?

Reply.
Information sender

TTXuan Tran Thi

I find this perspective fascinating because it frames poetry as both marginalized and transformative. Does Jarmusch mean that the potential of poetry to innovate language is underappreciated by mainstream society? I also question whether this societal resistance shapes the kinds of poetry that gain recognition—are more experimental, subtle, or daring forms emerging precisely from the fringes? How might the contrast between public skepticism and poetic innovation influence the development of new literary styles?

Reply.
Information sender

SSelina

This statement raises questions about cultural appreciation and accessibility. Why does Jarmusch suggest that mentioning poetry could provoke such hostility? Is it a reflection of a lack of engagement with language arts, or a broader discomfort with introspection and artistic expression? I also wonder whether this perceived danger motivates poets and writers to innovate, creating language and forms that are more impactful precisely because they challenge mainstream norms.

Reply.
Information sender

HHHa Huan

Reading this, I’m intrigued by Jarmusch’s perception of poetry as both undervalued and powerful. Does he exaggerate for effect, or is there a real social resistance to poetry in American culture? I also wonder how this societal attitude influences poets themselves—does it encourage subversive or experimental forms, or does it marginalize them? Could the very strength and beauty he admires be what makes poetry intimidating or inaccessible to some audiences?

Reply.
Information sender
Leave the question
Click here to rate
Information sender