I'm talking to you and it's basically a direct communication

I'm talking to you and it's basically a direct communication

22/09/2025
18/10/2025

I'm talking to you and it's basically a direct communication, whereas if I'm writing a letter to you and you read the letter, there are like 12 extra deconstruction and reconstruction steps in the communication.

I'm talking to you and it's basically a direct communication
I'm talking to you and it's basically a direct communication
I'm talking to you and it's basically a direct communication, whereas if I'm writing a letter to you and you read the letter, there are like 12 extra deconstruction and reconstruction steps in the communication.
I'm talking to you and it's basically a direct communication
I'm talking to you and it's basically a direct communication, whereas if I'm writing a letter to you and you read the letter, there are like 12 extra deconstruction and reconstruction steps in the communication.
I'm talking to you and it's basically a direct communication
I'm talking to you and it's basically a direct communication, whereas if I'm writing a letter to you and you read the letter, there are like 12 extra deconstruction and reconstruction steps in the communication.
I'm talking to you and it's basically a direct communication
I'm talking to you and it's basically a direct communication, whereas if I'm writing a letter to you and you read the letter, there are like 12 extra deconstruction and reconstruction steps in the communication.
I'm talking to you and it's basically a direct communication
I'm talking to you and it's basically a direct communication, whereas if I'm writing a letter to you and you read the letter, there are like 12 extra deconstruction and reconstruction steps in the communication.
I'm talking to you and it's basically a direct communication
I'm talking to you and it's basically a direct communication, whereas if I'm writing a letter to you and you read the letter, there are like 12 extra deconstruction and reconstruction steps in the communication.
I'm talking to you and it's basically a direct communication
I'm talking to you and it's basically a direct communication, whereas if I'm writing a letter to you and you read the letter, there are like 12 extra deconstruction and reconstruction steps in the communication.
I'm talking to you and it's basically a direct communication
I'm talking to you and it's basically a direct communication, whereas if I'm writing a letter to you and you read the letter, there are like 12 extra deconstruction and reconstruction steps in the communication.
I'm talking to you and it's basically a direct communication
I'm talking to you and it's basically a direct communication, whereas if I'm writing a letter to you and you read the letter, there are like 12 extra deconstruction and reconstruction steps in the communication.
I'm talking to you and it's basically a direct communication
I'm talking to you and it's basically a direct communication
I'm talking to you and it's basically a direct communication
I'm talking to you and it's basically a direct communication
I'm talking to you and it's basically a direct communication
I'm talking to you and it's basically a direct communication
I'm talking to you and it's basically a direct communication
I'm talking to you and it's basically a direct communication
I'm talking to you and it's basically a direct communication
I'm talking to you and it's basically a direct communication

Host: The room glowed with the soft blue light of computer screens. Rows of servers hummed like mechanical crickets in the dimness, their LEDs blinking in patient rhythm. Outside, the city rain tapped on the window, a subtle percussion to the electric silence inside.

It was midnight in a tech lab, long after everyone else had gone. Only Jack and Jeeny remained — two figures framed by the faint light of monitors, surrounded by wires, screens, and the neon heartbeat of machines that never slept.

Jack, sleeves rolled up, eyes weary but alert, leaned over a console; Jeeny, seated opposite him, had her hands folded beneath her chin, her expression thoughtful — curious, almost tender. Between them flickered a chat window, open but wordless.

Jeeny: “Kevin J. Anderson once said — ‘I’m talking to you and it’s basically a direct communication, whereas if I’m writing a letter, there are 12 extra deconstruction and reconstruction steps.’

Jack: (without looking up) “Yeah. And he’s right. Talking is signal, pure and immediate. Writing is translation. You lose half the meaning between the lines.”

Host: Jack’s voice was low, a blend of logic and fatigue, yet his words had a kind of electric certainty, like a man who’d dissected every thought until it bled reason.

Jeeny: “But isn’t that what makes it beautiful? Writing lets you breathe between the thoughts. Talking — it’s a rush, an explosion. Writing is the echo that lets you understand the blast.”

Jack: “That’s the problem. Echoes distort. Every reader reconstructs your meaning differently. Twelve people, twelve interpretations. You might as well be whispering in a hurricane.”

Jeeny: (smiling faintly) “And yet, somehow, that whisper survives centuries. Plato’s dialogues. Dickinson’s letters. Rumi’s verses. All written — all reborn with every reader. Talking dies the moment you stop breathing.”

Host: A neon sign outside flickered, painting blue shadows across their faces. The servers’ hum grew louder, like the pulse of an unseen presence listening in. Jack rubbed his temple, the light reflecting off his grey eyes, while Jeeny looked at him with quiet amusement.

Jack: “You’re romanticizing inefficiency.”

Jeeny: “I’m humanizing it.”

Jack: “There’s nothing human about twelve steps of misinterpretation.”

Jeeny: “But there’s soul in it. Don’t you see? The struggle to understand is what makes communication real. If you could transfer meaning perfectly — like a machine — where’s the humanity in that?”

Host: The word ‘machine’ lingered in the air, as if the servers themselves had taken offense. Their fans whirred, growing louder, their LEDs pulsing faster, until the room shimmered with artificial breath.

Jack: “Machines don’t misunderstand. They don’t twist your words or color them with emotion. You feed in data; you get data back. That’s clarity. That’s truth.”

Jeeny: “No, Jack. That’s death. Truth without misunderstanding is sterile. Meaning lives in interpretation — in the cracks between what I say and what you hear.”

Host: Jeeny’s eyes softened, her voice lowering to a whisper, intimate yet sharp. Jack turned, finally meeting her gaze. In that stillness, the hum of the machines seemed to slow, as if the room itself leaned in.

Jeeny: “When you talk, Jack, your words hit the air — warm, imperfect, alive. But when you write… you bleed intention. You let time touch it. You give it shape beyond your control.”

Jack: “So, you prefer ghosts to people?”

Jeeny: “Maybe I believe ghosts are more honest than algorithms.”

Jack: “And what about now? We’re talking face to face. Isn’t this better than hiding behind the safety of metaphor?”

Jeeny: “Better for clarity, maybe. But not for memory. What we say now will vanish the moment we leave. A letter — a poem — a sentence carved into time, that’s what endures.”

Host: Jack leaned back, exhaling. The light flickered on his face, half-illuminated, half-lost in shadow — as though torn between two worlds: the instant pulse of speech and the slow burn of written truth.

Jack: “Endurance doesn’t equal meaning. Most words that endure do so by accident — like fossils. Their creators long dead, their context lost.”

Jeeny: “And yet, we still find them beautiful. Why?”

Jack: “Because we’re sentimental creatures. We crave echoes when silence scares us.”

Jeeny: “No, because we’re meaning-makers. We find poetry in fossils, yes — but that poetry is proof we still feel. Isn’t that the point?”

Host: A pause. The rain slowed, its rhythm gentle now, like the breath of a sleeping city. Jeeny rose from her chair, moving toward the window, her reflection merging with the neon glow outside.

Jeeny: “You ever think about how different we’d be if everything we said vanished instantly — no records, no letters, no art?”

Jack: “We’d be freer.”

Jeeny: “Or emptier.”

Jack: “No archives. No misinterpretation. Just the purity of the moment.”

Jeeny: “But moments die. Records let them live. They let us revisit ourselves.”

Jack: “You mean, they let us haunt ourselves.”

Jeeny: “Maybe haunting is just another word for remembering.”

Host: The servers dimmed, as if listening in silence. The light now came only from the screen between them, its glow soft, steady — like a fragile bridge connecting two separate storms.

Jack: “Anderson’s right. Real communication is direct. Talking is raw bandwidth. Writing… it’s compression, encryption, reconstruction. Too many filters.”

Jeeny: “But filters give us texture. Without them, you’d have noise. Think about it: music needs silence between notes, just as understanding needs reflection between words.”

Jack: “You think distance makes words deeper?”

Jeeny: “I think distance makes them real. When I write you a letter, you’re not reacting — you’re receiving. That difference matters.”

Jack: “But what if I misunderstand?”

Jeeny: “Then I get to know you by how you misread me.”

Host: Jack laughed softly, a rare sound, warm but unguarded. The servers blinked, almost in response, as though the machines themselves were amused.

Jack: “You’re impossible. You defend inefficiency with poetry.”

Jeeny: “And you defend immediacy with fear.”

Jack: (pausing) “Fear?”

Jeeny: “You fear silence. You fill it with logic, with explanation, with efficiency — anything but vulnerability. That’s why you love directness. It doesn’t require waiting.”

Host: Jack’s eyes dropped to the screen, where the cursor blinked, waiting. The tiny pulse of code looked almost alive, like the heartbeat of everything left unsaid.

Jack: “Maybe I’m just tired of being misread.”

Jeeny: “Then write again — and let them misread you beautifully.”

Host: The rain stopped, leaving a quiet so profound it felt like an ending. Jeeny turned away from the window, her eyes glowing softly, her voice calm.

Jeeny: “You know, communication isn’t about transfer — it’s about transformation. When you speak, you want to be understood. When you write, you want to be remembered.”

Jack: “And if I want neither?”

Jeeny: “Then you’re already a ghost.”

Host: A long silence followed — not empty, but alive, pulsing with the weight of shared awareness. Jack looked at her, the light flickering across his face, and for once, his expression softened completely.

Jack: “So maybe the extra twelve steps aren’t a flaw after all.”

Jeeny: “Maybe they’re the price of depth.”

Jack: “And talking?”

Jeeny: “Talking is the spark. Writing is the fire that keeps burning after you’re gone.”

Host: The servers resumed their steady hum, and the cursor on the screen blinked once more — patient, eternal, waiting. Jeeny’s reflection lingered beside Jack’s, twin silhouettes caught between light and code, language and silence.

Outside, the city lights dimmed, as if bowing to their stillness.

The camera pulls back, revealing the glow of the room — two figures framed in a world of connection and misunderstanding, where every word was both a signal and a prayer.

And as the screen faded to black, one final truth lingered like a whisper in static:

That the distance between voices is what makes meaning human
and the twelve steps of misunderstanding are the very steps that lead us home.

Kevin J. Anderson
Kevin J. Anderson

American - Writer Born: March 27, 1962

Same category

Tocpics Related
Notable authors
Have 0 Comment I'm talking to you and it's basically a direct communication

AAdministratorAdministrator

Welcome, honored guests. Please leave a comment, we will respond soon

Reply.
Information sender
Leave the question
Click here to rate
Information sender