Instead of giving a politician the keys to the city, it might be

Instead of giving a politician the keys to the city, it might be

22/09/2025
22/09/2025

Instead of giving a politician the keys to the city, it might be better to change the locks.

Instead of giving a politician the keys to the city, it might be
Instead of giving a politician the keys to the city, it might be
Instead of giving a politician the keys to the city, it might be better to change the locks.
Instead of giving a politician the keys to the city, it might be
Instead of giving a politician the keys to the city, it might be better to change the locks.
Instead of giving a politician the keys to the city, it might be
Instead of giving a politician the keys to the city, it might be better to change the locks.
Instead of giving a politician the keys to the city, it might be
Instead of giving a politician the keys to the city, it might be better to change the locks.
Instead of giving a politician the keys to the city, it might be
Instead of giving a politician the keys to the city, it might be better to change the locks.
Instead of giving a politician the keys to the city, it might be
Instead of giving a politician the keys to the city, it might be better to change the locks.
Instead of giving a politician the keys to the city, it might be
Instead of giving a politician the keys to the city, it might be better to change the locks.
Instead of giving a politician the keys to the city, it might be
Instead of giving a politician the keys to the city, it might be better to change the locks.
Instead of giving a politician the keys to the city, it might be
Instead of giving a politician the keys to the city, it might be better to change the locks.
Instead of giving a politician the keys to the city, it might be
Instead of giving a politician the keys to the city, it might be
Instead of giving a politician the keys to the city, it might be
Instead of giving a politician the keys to the city, it might be
Instead of giving a politician the keys to the city, it might be
Instead of giving a politician the keys to the city, it might be
Instead of giving a politician the keys to the city, it might be
Instead of giving a politician the keys to the city, it might be
Instead of giving a politician the keys to the city, it might be
Instead of giving a politician the keys to the city, it might be

Doug Larson, with wit sharpened like a blade, once remarked: “Instead of giving a politician the keys to the city, it might be better to change the locks.” Cloaked in humor, his words strike at a truth as old as governance itself: that to grant politicians honor and trust without caution is to invite betrayal. For too often, those raised high by public adoration forget service and seek instead their own gain. The “keys” symbolize not only access to the city but to the hearts, wealth, and hopes of the people. Larson warns: guard them well, for trust misplaced can become captivity.

The origin of this saying lies in Larson’s career as a columnist, where he wielded humor to expose the flaws of human nature. He saw how citizens celebrated their leaders, offering them ceremonial keys, as if they were guardians of virtue. Yet history abounds with examples of such leaders abusing power. Larson turned the custom on its head: perhaps honor should not be bestowed too easily—better, he suggests, to change the locks, to guard against the weaknesses of ambition and greed.

History confirms his jest’s dark wisdom. In the days of Renaissance Italy, cities often showered their rulers with loyalty, only to find themselves betrayed. The people of Florence once welcomed the Medici back with open arms, yet soon found their liberties bound by the very family they had exalted. Had they “changed the locks” instead of granting trust, their freedom might have endured longer. Larson’s quip echoes this ancient pattern: misplaced trust leads to bondage.

So too in modern times, corruption scandals remind us of the same lesson. Mayors, governors, presidents—all have been given the figurative “keys” of public trust, only to misuse them for profit or vanity. The fall of Richard Nixon, exalted as a statesman yet undone by Watergate, is but one example: the people honored him, and in return, he broke into the very house he was sworn to protect. Truly, Larson’s humor masks a cry for vigilance.

Therefore, O seekers of wisdom, remember: trust in leaders must be bound to accountability. To honor them without question is folly; to watch them with careful eyes is wisdom. The locks of power must always be tested, for temptation corrodes the noblest of men. Larson’s words, though light in tone, thunder with warning: better a city that guards itself well than one that surrenders blindly. For the keys to freedom must never be left unattended.

Doug Larson
Doug Larson

American - Journalist Born: February 10, 1926

Tocpics Related
Notable authors
Have 6 Comment Instead of giving a politician the keys to the city, it might be

VDkim van duong

This quote by Doug Larson is a humorous but serious reflection of how many citizens feel about their elected officials. The metaphor suggests a need for increased caution and scrutiny of those in power. Does this mean we need a systemic overhaul, or could it be that simple reforms in transparency and accountability could ‘change the locks’ without undermining the system entirely?

Reply.
Information sender

KPVuong kha phung

Doug Larson’s metaphor about changing the locks rather than giving politicians the keys to the city strikes a chord with those who feel that power is often misused. Could this represent a broader societal shift toward less trust in government and more focus on safeguarding public interests? How can we ensure that we, the people, have the ‘keys’ to a truly democratic system of governance?

Reply.
Information sender

NANGUYEN NGOC ANH

Larson’s quote is a clever and somewhat jaded commentary on how politicians can overstep their bounds, abusing the trust given to them by the public. It raises an interesting question: Instead of changing the locks, should we focus on holding politicians accountable through better legislation or stronger transparency? Are we letting the system fail by focusing on the ‘locks’ rather than the root causes?

Reply.
Information sender

GLGia Linhh

This quote is a strong metaphor for the cynicism many people feel toward politicians and their control over our lives. Larson’s suggestion to ‘change the locks’ is a call for greater accountability and perhaps even systemic change. But does this also imply that we, as citizens, need to take more responsibility for ensuring checks and balances in our political systems?

Reply.
Information sender

TTThao Pham Thi Thu

Larson’s quote reflects a deep skepticism about the political system, suggesting that politicians often abuse their power. It makes me wonder: Is the key to fixing government really about controlling power, or should we focus more on making the system more transparent and inclusive? Could this mentality of distrust actually undermine efforts to improve governance?

Reply.
Information sender
Leave the question
Click here to rate
Information sender