It may be said that poems are in one way like icebergs: only

It may be said that poems are in one way like icebergs: only

22/09/2025
25/10/2025

It may be said that poems are in one way like icebergs: only about a third of their bulk appears above the surface of the page.

It may be said that poems are in one way like icebergs: only
It may be said that poems are in one way like icebergs: only
It may be said that poems are in one way like icebergs: only about a third of their bulk appears above the surface of the page.
It may be said that poems are in one way like icebergs: only
It may be said that poems are in one way like icebergs: only about a third of their bulk appears above the surface of the page.
It may be said that poems are in one way like icebergs: only
It may be said that poems are in one way like icebergs: only about a third of their bulk appears above the surface of the page.
It may be said that poems are in one way like icebergs: only
It may be said that poems are in one way like icebergs: only about a third of their bulk appears above the surface of the page.
It may be said that poems are in one way like icebergs: only
It may be said that poems are in one way like icebergs: only about a third of their bulk appears above the surface of the page.
It may be said that poems are in one way like icebergs: only
It may be said that poems are in one way like icebergs: only about a third of their bulk appears above the surface of the page.
It may be said that poems are in one way like icebergs: only
It may be said that poems are in one way like icebergs: only about a third of their bulk appears above the surface of the page.
It may be said that poems are in one way like icebergs: only
It may be said that poems are in one way like icebergs: only about a third of their bulk appears above the surface of the page.
It may be said that poems are in one way like icebergs: only
It may be said that poems are in one way like icebergs: only about a third of their bulk appears above the surface of the page.
It may be said that poems are in one way like icebergs: only
It may be said that poems are in one way like icebergs: only
It may be said that poems are in one way like icebergs: only
It may be said that poems are in one way like icebergs: only
It may be said that poems are in one way like icebergs: only
It may be said that poems are in one way like icebergs: only
It may be said that poems are in one way like icebergs: only
It may be said that poems are in one way like icebergs: only
It may be said that poems are in one way like icebergs: only
It may be said that poems are in one way like icebergs: only

Howard Nemerov, poet of depth and subtle vision, once gave this enduring metaphor: “It may be said that poems are in one way like icebergs: only about a third of their bulk appears above the surface of the page.” In these words he revealed the ancient secret of poetry—that its true power lies not in what is written, but in what lies hidden beneath. A poem may appear small, even fragile, but its meaning extends vast and deep, unseen by the eye yet felt by the soul. The page offers only the tip; beneath rests an ocean of silence, suggestion, memory, and emotion waiting to be discovered.

The ancients too knew this mystery. When the Delphic Oracle spoke, her words were often few, obscure, even riddling. Yet behind them lay oceans of meaning, enough to guide kings and alter the fate of nations. The brevity was not weakness but strength, for it invited the hearer to enter the depths. So too with poetry: the words on the page are but signals, glimpses of a vast interior landscape. The iceberg is not defined by what is seen above water, but by the hidden body below.

History gives us striking examples. Consider T. S. Eliot’s The Waste Land. To the casual reader, it is a series of fragmented images, strange voices, and broken phrases. Yet beneath the surface lies an immense architecture of myth, history, and spiritual longing. Scholars have spent decades exploring its submerged body, and still new meanings arise. This is what Nemerov’s iceberg teaches us: the visible is only the gateway to the invisible, and the invisible is often greater.

The metaphor also reminds us of the relationship between poet and reader. The poet may reveal a fragment, but the reader must dive beneath the waters to uncover the rest. It is a partnership in discovery. Poetry thus trains the soul to look beyond appearances, to sense the hidden weight of things. Just as sailors must remember that the greatest danger of the iceberg lies beneath, readers must remember that the greatest beauty of poetry lies beyond the words themselves.

There is also a heroic lesson here. For in a world filled with noise and excess, poetry teaches restraint. The poet does not spill everything onto the page; he trusts silence, trusts suggestion, trusts the reader to explore. To write a poem is an act of discipline, of holding back, of knowing that the unsaid may carry more power than the said. In this way, the poet resembles the sculptor who leaves part of the stone uncarved, letting the imagination of the beholder complete the form.

So what lesson must we take, children of tomorrow? It is this: do not be deceived by surfaces. In poetry, in people, in life, the visible is only a fraction of the truth. Seek the depths. Listen not only to words, but to silences. Look not only at faces, but into hearts. Understand that what is hidden may shape reality more profoundly than what is seen. Poetry, like the iceberg, is a reminder of the mystery and vastness beneath all things.

Practical wisdom flows. When you read poetry, linger with it. Do not rush to grasp meaning, but let it unfold slowly, as divers explore the deep. When you speak, consider what is best left unsaid, trusting silence to carry weight. And in your encounters with others, remember that every soul carries depths unseen; treat them with patience and reverence, for you glimpse only the tip of who they are.

Thus Nemerov’s words shine as a beacon: poems are like icebergs, their true greatness hidden beneath the page. Learn to look beneath, and life itself will open before you with greater depth, mystery, and wonder. For the world, like poetry, is always more than it seems.

Tocpics Related
Notable authors
Have 5 Comment It may be said that poems are in one way like icebergs: only

VTnguyen viet tien

Nemerov’s iceberg analogy is a great way to explain the subtlety of poetry. It makes me wonder, though, if we only get to see a small part of the iceberg, does that mean we’re missing out on something essential? What does it mean for a poem to be fully understood? Can a poem be powerful just in what’s on the surface, or do we need to dive into its deeper meanings to appreciate it fully?

Reply.
Information sender

NNNguyen nhat nam

Nemerov’s quote gives me the sense that poetry has a complexity and richness that often goes unnoticed. But is the depth of a poem always intentional, or do readers sometimes impose meanings that aren’t actually there? When you read a poem, is it about feeling the surface-level impact, or do you feel compelled to explore the layers beneath it? What happens when you can’t find those hidden layers?

Reply.
Information sender

H1Hoang Nhat Hao 11a2

This comparison between poems and icebergs is so fitting. It makes me think about how poetry, much like an iceberg, can carry emotional or thematic weight that’s not immediately visible. How do we, as readers, determine whether to focus on the surface or dig deeper? Is it the poet's responsibility to guide us, or is it up to us to explore the hidden depths of each poem?

Reply.
Information sender

QQuinツ

I love how Nemerov describes poems as being like icebergs. It makes me wonder—if only a third of the poem is visible, does that mean the poet is intentionally withholding meaning, or is there an inherent mystery in poetry that invites interpretation? How much of a poem's meaning should we try to uncover, and how much should we simply enjoy what’s presented on the surface?

Reply.
Information sender

NPNha Phuong

Howard Nemerov’s comparison of poems to icebergs really makes me think about how much poetry hides beneath the surface. There’s often so much more depth in a poem than what’s immediately visible. But how much of that ‘hidden’ meaning should the reader uncover? Does it make poetry richer if we discover its deeper layers, or does it take away from the experience if we overanalyze it?

Reply.
Information sender
Leave the question
Click here to rate
Information sender