'Milk and Honey' was written with me being honest to myself

'Milk and Honey' was written with me being honest to myself

22/09/2025
18/10/2025

'Milk and Honey' was written with me being honest to myself, kind of pulling at the things that I hear the most and saying that out loud, and you know, that thing that we hear the most is most universal, and so that rings true with all folks. The language used in the poetry is extremely, extremely accessible.

'Milk and Honey' was written with me being honest to myself
'Milk and Honey' was written with me being honest to myself
'Milk and Honey' was written with me being honest to myself, kind of pulling at the things that I hear the most and saying that out loud, and you know, that thing that we hear the most is most universal, and so that rings true with all folks. The language used in the poetry is extremely, extremely accessible.
'Milk and Honey' was written with me being honest to myself
'Milk and Honey' was written with me being honest to myself, kind of pulling at the things that I hear the most and saying that out loud, and you know, that thing that we hear the most is most universal, and so that rings true with all folks. The language used in the poetry is extremely, extremely accessible.
'Milk and Honey' was written with me being honest to myself
'Milk and Honey' was written with me being honest to myself, kind of pulling at the things that I hear the most and saying that out loud, and you know, that thing that we hear the most is most universal, and so that rings true with all folks. The language used in the poetry is extremely, extremely accessible.
'Milk and Honey' was written with me being honest to myself
'Milk and Honey' was written with me being honest to myself, kind of pulling at the things that I hear the most and saying that out loud, and you know, that thing that we hear the most is most universal, and so that rings true with all folks. The language used in the poetry is extremely, extremely accessible.
'Milk and Honey' was written with me being honest to myself
'Milk and Honey' was written with me being honest to myself, kind of pulling at the things that I hear the most and saying that out loud, and you know, that thing that we hear the most is most universal, and so that rings true with all folks. The language used in the poetry is extremely, extremely accessible.
'Milk and Honey' was written with me being honest to myself
'Milk and Honey' was written with me being honest to myself, kind of pulling at the things that I hear the most and saying that out loud, and you know, that thing that we hear the most is most universal, and so that rings true with all folks. The language used in the poetry is extremely, extremely accessible.
'Milk and Honey' was written with me being honest to myself
'Milk and Honey' was written with me being honest to myself, kind of pulling at the things that I hear the most and saying that out loud, and you know, that thing that we hear the most is most universal, and so that rings true with all folks. The language used in the poetry is extremely, extremely accessible.
'Milk and Honey' was written with me being honest to myself
'Milk and Honey' was written with me being honest to myself, kind of pulling at the things that I hear the most and saying that out loud, and you know, that thing that we hear the most is most universal, and so that rings true with all folks. The language used in the poetry is extremely, extremely accessible.
'Milk and Honey' was written with me being honest to myself
'Milk and Honey' was written with me being honest to myself, kind of pulling at the things that I hear the most and saying that out loud, and you know, that thing that we hear the most is most universal, and so that rings true with all folks. The language used in the poetry is extremely, extremely accessible.
'Milk and Honey' was written with me being honest to myself
'Milk and Honey' was written with me being honest to myself
'Milk and Honey' was written with me being honest to myself
'Milk and Honey' was written with me being honest to myself
'Milk and Honey' was written with me being honest to myself
'Milk and Honey' was written with me being honest to myself
'Milk and Honey' was written with me being honest to myself
'Milk and Honey' was written with me being honest to myself
'Milk and Honey' was written with me being honest to myself
'Milk and Honey' was written with me being honest to myself

“‘Milk and Honey’ was written with me being honest to myself, kind of pulling at the things that I hear the most and saying that out loud, and you know, that thing that we hear the most is most universal, and so that rings true with all folks. The language used in the poetry is extremely, extremely accessible.” Thus speaks Rupi Kaur, a poet of the present age, whose words travel quickly across screens and pages into the hearts of millions. In her confession lies a principle as old as art itself: that truth, when spoken simply and honestly, becomes a mirror in which countless souls can see themselves.

The meaning of this saying lies in the power of honesty and accessibility. Kaur does not claim that her work is ornamented or hidden behind layers of abstraction. Instead, she insists on stripping language down until only what is essential remains: the voice of the heart, spoken plainly. In this plainness is strength, for the most universal truths are often the ones closest to us, truths we hear again and again in our own lives—love, loss, pain, healing. By writing them out loud, she transforms the private into the collective.

The origin of this approach can be found in the tradition of confessional and spoken-word poets. Writers like Sylvia Plath and Anne Sexton dared to write with raw honesty, opening the wounds of their lives so others could recognize their own. In another sphere, poets of the Harlem Renaissance and later the spoken-word movement embraced accessibility, creating verses meant not only for scholars but for communities, to be read, heard, and shared. Kaur inherits this lineage, though in her own way: with brevity, directness, and the courage to make poetry accessible to millions.

Consider also the story of Sappho, the ancient Greek poet. Her fragments, simple and direct, have survived for centuries not because they were elaborate, but because they were honest. In a handful of lines, she gave voice to longing, tenderness, and despair—emotions that remain universal even thousands of years later. Just as Kaur explains, when the poet writes what she herself hears most deeply, she speaks also for all people. The voice of one heart becomes the voice of humanity.

The lesson here is that we do not need grand complexity to speak truths that endure. In fact, too much complexity can obscure the heart of a message. Accessible language is not weakness, but generosity—it opens the door for all to enter, not just the few trained in literary codes. When we are brave enough to say aloud what hurts, what heals, what we long for, we give others the courage to recognize their own hidden feelings. This is why her work resonates: because it invites everyone into the circle of poetry.

Practically, this means that when we write, speak, or create, we should strive for honesty first, clarity second, and adornment only if it serves the truth. Ask yourself: what do I hear most often in my own life? What refrain keeps returning to my heart? Speak that. Do not worry if it seems too simple, for what is simple to you may be universal to others. And in your daily life, practice this same openness: speak plainly with those you love, for honesty is always the beginning of healing.

Thus the teaching endures: poetry that is honest and accessible becomes a bridge across all divisions. Rupi Kaur’s words remind us that the truths we whisper to ourselves are often the very truths the world most longs to hear. Let us then have the courage to speak them—not in tangled words, but in the language of the heart—so that others, hearing them, may recognize themselves and know they are not alone. For in that moment, the private pain becomes a universal song.

Rupi Kaur
Rupi Kaur

Canadian - Poet Born: October 5, 1992

Tocpics Related
Notable authors
Have 6 Comment 'Milk and Honey' was written with me being honest to myself

KKohgvbjih

Rupi Kaur’s focus on honesty and accessibility in her poetry is something that resonates with many readers. But I’m curious—does the accessibility of her work mean that it’s more superficial, or is it simply more inclusive? When poetry speaks to so many people, does it risk losing its individuality or staying too general? Can the power of simplicity ever be as profound as the power of complexity in poetry?

Reply.
Information sender

DTsy danh thinh

Kaur’s approach of speaking aloud what she hears most makes her work feel personal and relatable, but I also wonder: is poetry’s power in its simplicity, or does it lie in the complexity of the words used? How does the balance between accessibility and artistic complexity affect the emotional impact of a poem? Does using simple language allow more people to connect, or does it sometimes dilute the message?

Reply.
Information sender

QHHo Quang Hien

Rupi Kaur’s use of accessible language in ‘Milk and Honey’ really speaks to the emotional core of her readers. However, I wonder if this simplicity sacrifices some of the intricacy or poetic devices that make more complex works so rich. Is it possible to write deeply impactful poetry while keeping the language simple, or does poetry lose its essence when it becomes too straightforward? I’d love to hear how others feel about the tradeoff between accessibility and depth.

Reply.
Information sender

HTle thi hong thuy

I love that Kaur believes in the universality of the themes she touches on. It’s true that the things we hear most are often the things everyone can relate to. But I’m curious—does this universality mean that her work has the same impact on all readers, or do some people need more complex or unique expressions to feel the same connection? How do we know when something is universally resonant or just overly familiar?

Reply.
Information sender

TTBui Thi Tham

Kaur’s honesty in her work is powerful, and it’s interesting to think about how poetry can resonate with so many people simply by expressing things we all feel. But I wonder, does the accessibility of her language risk making the poetry feel too generic or lacking in nuance for some readers? Is there a balance between universal appeal and personal expression in poetry, and how does Kaur navigate that balance?

Reply.
Information sender
Leave the question
Click here to rate
Information sender