No man can call himself liberal, or radical, or even a

No man can call himself liberal, or radical, or even a

22/09/2025
11/10/2025

No man can call himself liberal, or radical, or even a conservative advocate of fair play, if his work depends in any way on the unpaid or underpaid labor of women at home, or in the office.

No man can call himself liberal, or radical, or even a
No man can call himself liberal, or radical, or even a
No man can call himself liberal, or radical, or even a conservative advocate of fair play, if his work depends in any way on the unpaid or underpaid labor of women at home, or in the office.
No man can call himself liberal, or radical, or even a
No man can call himself liberal, or radical, or even a conservative advocate of fair play, if his work depends in any way on the unpaid or underpaid labor of women at home, or in the office.
No man can call himself liberal, or radical, or even a
No man can call himself liberal, or radical, or even a conservative advocate of fair play, if his work depends in any way on the unpaid or underpaid labor of women at home, or in the office.
No man can call himself liberal, or radical, or even a
No man can call himself liberal, or radical, or even a conservative advocate of fair play, if his work depends in any way on the unpaid or underpaid labor of women at home, or in the office.
No man can call himself liberal, or radical, or even a
No man can call himself liberal, or radical, or even a conservative advocate of fair play, if his work depends in any way on the unpaid or underpaid labor of women at home, or in the office.
No man can call himself liberal, or radical, or even a
No man can call himself liberal, or radical, or even a conservative advocate of fair play, if his work depends in any way on the unpaid or underpaid labor of women at home, or in the office.
No man can call himself liberal, or radical, or even a
No man can call himself liberal, or radical, or even a conservative advocate of fair play, if his work depends in any way on the unpaid or underpaid labor of women at home, or in the office.
No man can call himself liberal, or radical, or even a
No man can call himself liberal, or radical, or even a conservative advocate of fair play, if his work depends in any way on the unpaid or underpaid labor of women at home, or in the office.
No man can call himself liberal, or radical, or even a
No man can call himself liberal, or radical, or even a conservative advocate of fair play, if his work depends in any way on the unpaid or underpaid labor of women at home, or in the office.
No man can call himself liberal, or radical, or even a
No man can call himself liberal, or radical, or even a
No man can call himself liberal, or radical, or even a
No man can call himself liberal, or radical, or even a
No man can call himself liberal, or radical, or even a
No man can call himself liberal, or radical, or even a
No man can call himself liberal, or radical, or even a
No man can call himself liberal, or radical, or even a
No man can call himself liberal, or radical, or even a
No man can call himself liberal, or radical, or even a

When Gloria Steinem declared, “No man can call himself liberal, or radical, or even a conservative advocate of fair play, if his work depends in any way on the unpaid or underpaid labor of women at home, or in the office,” she was not merely speaking of economics, but of justice, hypocrisy, and the hidden foundations of inequality. Her words, forged in the fires of the feminist movement, pierce through political illusion to reach the heart of morality itself. In this statement lies an eternal truth: that freedom, progress, and fairness cannot exist in any society where one half of humanity labors unseen and unrewarded for the comfort of the other.

The origin of this quote comes from Steinem’s long battle for gender equality in the twentieth century, when the modern feminist movement began to expose the invisible architecture of oppression. For centuries, women’s unpaid work — raising children, maintaining homes, supporting men’s careers — was treated as natural, not as labor. Meanwhile, those same men stood on podiums proclaiming liberty, equality, and justice. Steinem’s voice rose to remind them that their lofty ideals rang hollow so long as they rested upon the silent sacrifices of others. Her words strike not only the unjust, but the self-deceived — those who claim righteousness while benefiting from exploitation disguised as normalcy.

To the ancients, Steinem’s warning would have been a call to moral integrity — the alignment of word and deed. The philosophers of Greece and Rome taught that virtue lies in consistency: a person cannot claim to be just while acting unjustly in hidden ways. Her message, though modern in form, carries the spirit of Socrates, who asked men to examine their own lives before proclaiming wisdom. What Steinem challenges is not only patriarchy, but self-deception — the comforting lie that one can advocate for fairness while quietly enjoying the fruits of unfairness.

History offers many mirrors to her insight. Consider the industrial revolution, when men spoke of progress and prosperity even as women and children worked long hours in unsafe factories for meager wages. Or look further back, to the Roman household, where women’s domestic labor sustained empires but earned no glory. Even the most noble ideals of freedom — whether in revolution or reform — have too often been built on the backs of those denied recognition. Steinem’s words tear away this veil and demand a deeper honesty: true progress must begin at home, in the private and personal spaces where inequality first takes root.

Her statement is not only an accusation; it is a call to awakening. It reminds us that the labor of women, whether in homes or offices, has immense value — spiritual, emotional, and material — and that to ignore this truth is to live in moral blindness. A society that praises fairness but depends on invisible servitude is not enlightened but enslaved by its own contradictions. Steinem invites us to see that feminism is not a rebellion against men, but a restoration of balance — the recognition that dignity and compensation must belong to all who contribute to the human endeavor.

In her wisdom, there is also an echo of the ancient concept of Ma’at, the Egyptian goddess of truth and justice, who weighed the hearts of the dead against a feather. The heart that was heavy with deceit and imbalance was unworthy of eternal life. Likewise, Steinem’s words weigh our modern hearts: can we claim righteousness if our comforts are bought at another’s cost? Can a man truly call himself just if he demands equality only in the abstract, while his daily life rests on inequality? The measure of one’s virtue, she suggests, is not in what one says in public, but in how one lives in private.

The lesson that flows from this truth is timeless: there is no justice without balance, and no freedom built on exploitation. Each person must look inward and ask — whose labor sustains my comfort, and have I honored it rightly? To live by Steinem’s words is to give value where it has long been denied: to pay fairly, to share burdens equally, to acknowledge the unseen hands that make life possible. In homes, in workplaces, and in nations, fairness must become more than an ideal — it must become practice.

Thus, Gloria Steinem’s words stand as both warning and prophecy. They remind us that hypocrisy is the enemy of virtue, and that true progress begins when the invisible become visible, when the silent are heard, and when the labor of women — in every form — is honored with justice. Let these words be carried forward like a torch through the ages: do not speak of fairness until your life itself is fair. For only when equality dwells in the home, in the heart, and in the hands that build our world, will humanity be truly free.

Gloria Steinem
Gloria Steinem

American - Activist Born: March 25, 1934

Same category

Tocpics Related
Notable authors
Have 0 Comment No man can call himself liberal, or radical, or even a

AAdministratorAdministrator

Welcome, honored guests. Please leave a comment, we will respond soon

Reply.
Information sender
Leave the question
Click here to rate
Information sender