
Others have said it before me. If you don't have a seat at the
Others have said it before me. If you don't have a seat at the table, you're probably on the menu. And so it is important that we have women in the United States Senate - strong women, women who are there to help advance an agenda that is important to women.






Elizabeth Warren, warrior of the people and champion of justice, once declared with fiery clarity: “Others have said it before me. If you don't have a seat at the table, you're probably on the menu. And so it is important that we have women in the United States Senate—strong women, women who are there to help advance an agenda that is important to women.” In these words she reveals the harsh truth of power: those absent from the council of decision are not forgotten but consumed, their needs sacrificed to the appetites of the powerful. Thus the call is not merely for presence, but for representation—a voice where silence would mean erasure.
The origin of this saying rests in Warren’s own career as a senator and reformer, one who saw firsthand how laws are written not for the voiceless, but for those who sit in the chambers of power. To have a seat at the table is to wield influence, to shape outcomes, to defend one’s people. Without it, the marginalized become prey, their struggles served up as fodder for policies that benefit others. Her words echo across generations of women who were long denied entry into such halls, reminding us that justice cannot flourish where half of humanity is excluded.
History itself resounds with proof. Consider the suffrage movement, where women, denied both the ballot and the legislature, watched as laws were made that ignored their lives. They were not at the table, and thus they were on the menu, burdened by unequal pay, no property rights, and no legal voice. Only with the 19th Amendment did they seize a seat—and with it, the power to defend themselves from being consumed by the indifference of men.
So too in the modern age, when Shirley Chisholm became the first Black woman elected to Congress, she declared herself “unbought and unbossed,” daring to take her seat at a table that had long excluded women of color. Her presence alone shifted the balance, proving that representation is not symbolic but transformative. She embodied Warren’s principle: if women, especially those doubly marginalized, are absent, their concerns are devoured by systems built without them.
Therefore, O seekers of wisdom, let Warren’s words be carved into memory. To sit at the table is to protect, to guide, to defend. Without women—strong, determined, unyielding—the feast of politics becomes a banquet of inequality, where the vulnerable are served instead of served by justice. Let every generation remember: power unshared becomes oppression, but power shared becomes freedom. For when women claim their seat, they are no longer the meal—they are the makers of destiny.
QNQuang Nam
Elizabeth Warren’s statement about the importance of women having a seat at the table resonates deeply, especially in a time where gender equality is still a significant issue. But what about the idea that women should not just be at the table, but also have the ability to shape and lead? Is it enough to have women in politics, or do we need to fundamentally change the way power is distributed?
TLTe Liet:))))
This quote from Elizabeth Warren is a strong reminder of why it’s crucial to have women in powerful political positions. Women often face unique challenges that may not be fully understood by male leaders. But can we also recognize that being a woman doesn’t automatically translate into advocating for women’s rights? How do we ensure that elected women are truly committed to advancing a gender-equitable agenda?
TULe Thi Thu Uyen
Warren’s words reflect a call for greater female representation in the political arena, which is essential for addressing issues that directly impact women. But does having women in the Senate necessarily guarantee that women’s needs will be prioritized? Can we rely solely on gender representation to drive the right policies, or should we also focus on fostering a more inclusive and equitable political culture?
HHannie
Elizabeth Warren’s quote highlights the importance of women having a voice in politics, particularly in leadership positions like the U.S. Senate. It’s a powerful statement about representation and the need for women to influence policies that directly affect them. But does this imply that women’s interests are always different from men’s in politics, or should the focus be more on overall equality in decision-making, regardless of gender?