
Politics is a dirty game. We have our rules in boxing. In
Politics is a dirty game. We have our rules in boxing. In politics, no rules. Especially a young democracy like Ukraine. It's more like MMA.






Hear, O children of struggle, the fierce words of Vitali Klitschko: “Politics is a dirty game. We have our rules in boxing. In politics, no rules. Especially a young democracy like Ukraine. It’s more like MMA.” These words come from a man who once fought with fists and now fights with vision. He speaks not with the calm of a scholar, but with the grit of one who has tasted both the order of sport and the chaos of politics.
For in boxing, there are rules, referees, and boundaries. Victory is hard-earned, but it is achieved within limits agreed upon by all. Yet Klitschko declares that in politics, especially in nations still learning the path of freedom, no such limits exist. Alliances are betrayed, truths are twisted, and honor is too often cast aside. It is less like the noble duel of boxers and more like MMA, where the fight is raw, unpredictable, and ruthless.
Consider the history of Ukraine, struggling in its early years of independence after the fall of the Soviet Union. The soil of democracy was fresh, but the roots were shallow. Corruption, oligarchs, and foreign powers tugged at its foundations. Here, politics was no clean match—it was a storm of ambition, where rules were uncertain and power was sought by any means. Klitschko, who once obeyed the strict rules of the ring, found himself in an arena where even survival demanded vigilance.
History offers other parallels. When Rome first cast off its kings and became a republic, it, too, was a young democracy. There were laws, yes, but ambition and rivalry often outpaced them. Leaders like Marius, Sulla, and Caesar fought not with swords in fair duels but with cunning, deception, and brute force. In such days, politics was indeed more like the chaos of MMA than the discipline of a sport.
Therefore, O seekers of truth, learn this lesson: politics is not the clean arena of rules, but the messy struggle of wills. In stable lands, law may tame it; but in young democracies, it can be savage, unrefined, and merciless. Klitschko’s words remind us that to fight in this arena requires not only strength, but also patience, courage, and unshakable resolve. For unlike in sport, the stakes of politics are not trophies, but the fate of nations.
BKCao Ba Khan
It’s intriguing to think of politics as having no rules, especially in a country like Ukraine, which has faced so many challenges in its democratic journey. Does this lawlessness create more room for change, or does it leave the system vulnerable to exploitation? Can Ukraine thrive in this chaotic political environment, or will it lead to a deeper crisis of leadership and trust? I’m curious to see how this plays out in the long term.
KNKkk Nnn
Klitschko’s analogy to MMA is fascinating because it highlights the sheer unpredictability of politics, particularly in countries like Ukraine, where the democratic system is still evolving. But does this lack of rules lead to a more honest political process, or does it open the door for more manipulation and dishonesty? It makes me question whether structure in politics would actually improve the system or if it would just create more hurdles for progress.
TDNguyen Tan Dung
This quote makes me think about how messy politics can be, especially in fledgling democracies. If there are no rules, it’s almost as if politicians are forced to fight for survival, making compromises and alliances that may not always align with the public’s interest. Is this really sustainable for Ukraine, or will it eventually lead to a breakdown of trust in the system? What happens when the fight gets too brutal?
PHVy Pham hoai
I get what Klitschko is saying, but it raises an important question: Is the lack of rules in politics necessarily a bad thing, or is it just a reflection of the struggles that young democracies face? Can a lack of structure lead to innovation and progress, or does it just breed corruption and power struggles? It’s a tricky balance, and I’m curious to know how Ukraine is navigating this chaos.
NSNguyen Sang
Klitschko’s comparison of politics to MMA is interesting, especially when you consider the volatility of young democracies like Ukraine. Does the lack of rules in politics make it more chaotic, or does it simply reflect the unpredictable nature of governance in times of transition? I wonder if the absence of clear guidelines can sometimes lead to positive change, or if it just creates instability and confusion.