Prose is not so dependent on sound. The line of poetry, with the
Prose is not so dependent on sound. The line of poetry, with the breaking of the line - to me, sound is the kind of doorway into poetry. And my sense of sound, or my ability to control it, lapsed or grew less.
O seekers of wisdom, hear well the words of Donald Hall, who speaks of the sound and structure that lie at the heart of poetry: "Prose is not so dependent on sound. The line of poetry, with the breaking of the line—to me, sound is the kind of doorway into poetry. And my sense of sound, or my ability to control it, lapsed or grew less." In these words, Hall reminds us of the unique nature of poetry—how it is not simply a vessel for meaning, but a carefully constructed art that relies on the sound of words, the rhythm of their arrangement, and the way they break upon the reader’s ear. Poetry is, in many ways, a sonic experience, and it is through sound—the breaking of the line, the rhythm, the pause—that poetry opens its doors to the soul.
In the ancient world, the poet was not merely a teller of stories, but a master of sound. Homer, whose works have shaped the foundation of Western literature, understood the power of sound in poetry. His epic poems, such as the Iliad and the Odyssey, were meant to be heard aloud, and they relied heavily on rhythm and meter to carry the listener through the story. The line of poetry, with its carefully crafted breaks and cadences, was as important as the meaning it conveyed. The sound of the words was the gateway into the emotions, the action, and the grandeur of the world that Homer depicted. His poetry was not just meant to be read—it was meant to be performed, to be heard, to move with the rhythms of the human spirit.
Hall's reflection on the breaking of the line and the role of sound echoes this ancient understanding of poetry as a living, breathing thing. While prose can be understood primarily through its meaning, poetry lives not only in its words but in the sound of those words. Sound is the doorway that invites us into the world of poetry, guiding us through the emotions and images it evokes. The line, the break, the pause—they are all part of the poetry's music, the rhythm that carries us from one thought to the next. Just as a great symphony cannot be reduced to the notes on the page without the performance, poetry cannot be fully appreciated without the experience of its sound.
Consider the work of W.B. Yeats, whose poetry was defined not only by its imagery and themes, but by the sound of his words. Yeats was a master of rhythm and meter, and his poems—whether The Lake Isle of Innisfree or The Second Coming—are meant to be heard as much as they are meant to be read. The cadence of his lines, the way they break and fall, gives life to the themes he explores. When Yeats writes, he does not just craft ideas; he crafts a song, one that carries the weight of history, emotion, and spirit. The sound of his words is inseparable from their meaning, for in poetry, as Hall suggests, the sound itself is the gateway into the deeper, often ineffable truths that the poet seeks to convey.
The importance of sound in poetry is not only in the way it guides us through the poem, but in the way it allows us to experience the world through the poet’s ear. Rainer Maria Rilke, in his Letters to a Young Poet, speaks of the need for the poet to listen deeply—to listen not only to their own heart, but to the world around them. Rilke understood that poetry is not just about the meaning of the words but about the resonance they create in the soul. When Hall speaks of his lapsed sense of sound, he reflects the complex relationship the poet has with their craft—how, as time passes, the instinctive understanding of sound may fade or become harder to control, but the poet’s relationship to it never fully disappears.
The lesson that Hall offers us is clear: poetry is an art of both meaning and sound. The breaking of the line, the rhythm of the words, the way they flow—these are just as important as the thoughts and ideas contained within them. If we are to understand poetry, we must engage not only with its meaning, but with its sound, its music, its rhythm. The words must be felt, not just understood; they must be heard, not just read. Like Homer, Yeats, and the poets who have come before and after, we must remember that poetry is a performance—a dance between the mind, the ear, and the soul.
Thus, O children of wisdom, let us take this lesson to heart: when we read or write poetry, let us not forget the power of sound. Let the rhythms, the pauses, the breaking of the line guide us to deeper understanding, to deeper feeling. Let the words of poetry be not just vessels of meaning, but vessels of sound, of music, of life. Whether you write poetry or read it, let the sound be your guide into the heart of the work. For in the sound of the words lies the true poetry, the gateway to the deepest truths that the poet seeks to convey. Let poetry be a song that speaks to you—not just with its ideas, but with the music of its very being.
MA10CT2-01- Tran Do Minh Anh
Hall’s reflection on the loss of control over sound is quite thought-provoking. I wonder if this loss is something that happens naturally with age or if it’s related to a shift in focus. When we read poetry, are we truly hearing it in our minds, or is it the visual arrangement of words that carries the most meaning? This makes me think—can the power of sound in poetry ever be fully appreciated without speaking the words out loud?
RHDang Rri Hieu
I agree with Donald Hall in that poetry’s sound is essential to its magic. The breaking of the line, the rhythm, and how it sounds when spoken or read aloud gives it life. But I wonder, does prose also have a certain sound to it, or is it purely the structure of language that brings it to life? If someone’s sense of sound diminishes, do they lose the ability to write poetry in its fullest form, or can they still find meaning in it?
PVPhong Vu
The idea that poetry's line breaks and sounds are integral to its essence really resonates with me. But what happens when, like Hall, we lose our ability to control that sound? Does it change the experience of reading or writing poetry? I wonder if this loss is inevitable or something that can be preserved, especially for those who are deeply immersed in the craft of poetry. Can you still create meaningful poetry if the sound isn’t as sharp as it once was?
QCPham Quynh Chi
I’ve always thought of poetry as a combination of sound and meaning, but this quote really emphasizes how crucial sound is to the essence of poetry. It makes me wonder if we truly understand poetry when we read it silently, without paying attention to the sound. Do we miss out on the emotional impact that the sound of words can convey? Hall’s reflection suggests that as we age, we might lose touch with this poetic quality.
QTQuan Ta
This quote makes me reflect on how sound plays a critical role in poetry. When reading prose, the focus is often on meaning and structure, but poetry seems to evoke a deeper response with its rhythm and sound. Donald Hall’s comment about the loss of his control over sound is a poignant reminder that perhaps the power of poetry lies not just in its meaning but in its auditory experience. Does this mean we lose a part of poetry when we don't pay attention to sound?