
The feminine mystique has succeeded in burying millions of






Betty Friedan, with the voice of a prophetess rising from the silence of countless homes, declared: “The feminine mystique has succeeded in burying millions of American women alive.” These words are not gentle—they are a thunderclap against the heavens. She spoke of a prison without chains, a grave without soil, a silence enforced not by swords but by expectation. The feminine mystique, that gilded illusion that a woman’s destiny is only wifehood, motherhood, and servitude to the hearth, was to her a suffocating shroud, wrapping living women in the garments of death while their hearts still beat.
This mystique was born in the mid-20th century, a time when prosperity masked despair. Advertisements showed smiling housewives with gleaming kitchens, magazines praised the angel of the home, and the world declared the role of women complete. Yet behind those painted smiles lay hunger—for education, for work, for freedom of the soul. Friedan tore away the veil and revealed the truth: that millions of women lived lives of quiet desperation, their dreams buried beneath polished floors and ironed linens. To live without the chance to grow is to be buried alive, and she named that truth boldly.
History itself offers us the story of Nora Helmer, the heroine of Henrik Ibsen’s play A Doll’s House. Though fictional, she embodies the same suffocation. Treated as a child, adored as a decoration, she slowly realizes her life is not her own. At last, she slams the door on her marriage and steps into the unknown night, choosing the peril of freedom over the gilded cage of submission. Nora’s act, like Friedan’s words, was a call to awaken—to rise from the living grave of tradition and claim the air of life.
But Friedan’s declaration was not only condemnation; it was also a spark. Her book, The Feminine Mystique, set aflame the second wave of feminism, igniting movements across campuses, workplaces, and streets. Women began to see themselves not as failures for wanting more, but as pioneers breaking free from centuries of burial. They demanded education, equal pay, reproductive rights—each demand a strike of the shovel against the soil that had entombed them.
Therefore, O inheritors of freedom, let Friedan’s words echo in your hearts. Beware the illusions that imprison while promising happiness. Beware the voices that dress chains in ribbons and call them destiny. Remember always: to deny the soul its growth is to bury it alive, but to claim the right to live fully is to rise from the grave into the light. For woman is not mystique—she is strength, she is thought, she is flame.
TH15.Thai Thuan Hoa
Looking back at the 'feminine mystique,' it seems clear that many women were trapped by expectations that didn’t allow them to explore their own potential. But how much of this 'trapping' was internalized by women themselves? Did women embrace these roles because they were socialized into them, or were they truly bound by societal norms? And as we continue to evolve, how do we ensure that modern women are not similarly constrained by new forms of societal pressure?
Llongaothatday
In what ways did the 'feminine mystique' create a false narrative for women? When women were encouraged to find fulfillment in domestic duties and beauty standards, how did that rob them of the chance to pursue their own dreams? Today, are we as a society ready to accept that the fullness of a woman’s life might include far more than just being a wife or mother? How can we create spaces for women to thrive beyond the traditional roles they were once confined to?
LALuong Thi Lan Anh
Is the 'feminine mystique' something that still affects women today, even though it may no longer be as overt? Women are no longer expected to be only wives and mothers, but are they truly free from societal constraints? The journey to equal opportunity in the workforce and political arenas still has barriers, and the question remains: How much of society’s view of women’s roles is still subtly influenced by outdated notions of femininity?
MTMy Tran
Is it fair to say that the 'feminine mystique' didn’t just confine women—it buried them? Many women were taught that their value was tied to marriage and motherhood, leaving little room for exploration of other roles or identities. But how much of this is still present in today’s society? Do modern women still feel the pressure to fit into an idealized mold, or have we made enough progress toward true freedom of choice?
TLNguyen Tue Linh
Could the pressure of conforming to the 'feminine mystique' have had lasting effects on generations of women? When we think about how women were once expected to find satisfaction solely through motherhood and domesticity, it’s clear that many were denied opportunities for self-actualization. How does this historical perspective influence the modern woman’s struggle for empowerment and balance between personal and societal expectations?