The more I see of the representatives of the people, the more I
Alphonse de Lamartine, poet, statesman, and dreamer of a nobler France, once lamented with bitter elegance: “The more I see of the representatives of the people, the more I admire my dogs.” In these words he exposes the disillusionment of one who beheld politics up close. For he who once believed in the promise of representatives, entrusted with the sacred voice of the people, found instead vanity, selfishness, and betrayal. In contrast, the humble dog, loyal and true, shone brighter in virtue than the men who claimed to serve the nation.
The origin of this saying lies in Lamartine’s own tragic journey. A leader of the 1848 Revolution in France, he sought to guide the people into a republic of liberty and justice. For a moment, he stood at the pinnacle of power, speaking with passion that swayed the multitudes. But soon he was crushed between factions—revolutionaries on one side, reactionaries on the other—and he saw how personal ambition, greed, and treachery could poison the very idea of democracy. Thus, disenchanted with the representatives of the people, he turned in scorn to his dogs, who at least were faithful without deceit.
History echoes his pain. In ancient Rome, Cicero, who loved the Republic with all his soul, often decried the corruption of senators who sold their honor for gold or power. He, too, might have looked upon faithful animals with more admiration than men sworn to serve the commonwealth. Where politics became a stage of betrayal, the simple loyalty of a creature seemed a higher form of truth.
Lamartine’s words are not merely bitterness—they are also a warning. To admire dogs more than men is to say that loyalty, honesty, and devotion—qualities of beasts—are rarer in human politics than in nature itself. It is a cry of despair, but also a call for integrity. For if politicians cannot surpass dogs in faithfulness, then democracy itself is mocked.
Therefore, O seekers of wisdom, take this lesson to heart: beware the seductions of power, which corrode honor faster than rust corrodes steel. Strive to be like the dog—faithful, steadfast, and without guile. For the people deserve leaders whose loyalty is greater than ambition, whose devotion is stronger than deceit, and whose word is as true as the bark of a faithful hound.
IGieenn giiaa
Lamartine’s remark about preferring his dogs to the representatives of the people is a pointed critique of politics, expressing frustration with the dishonesty and complexity of political life. But does this view underestimate the potential for genuine, positive change through politics? Or is it a commentary on the sense of betrayal many feel when politicians fail to live up to the ideals they espouse?
TDTOAN DUONG
Lamartine’s comparison of politicians to dogs feels like a critique of human nature, particularly the way power and ambition can distort people's intentions. Could it be that animals, in their simplicity, offer a kind of honesty that we sometimes long for in our leaders? But is this sentiment reflective of a broader societal problem where people feel disconnected from those they elect, or is it just a moment of personal cynicism?
QTDiem Quynh Tran
The quote from Lamartine paints a picture of frustration with politicians, perhaps even hinting at a longing for the straightforwardness and loyalty of animals. But is this a fair assessment of all representatives? Could this statement be a reaction to personal experiences or a broader commentary on the disconnection between politicians and the people they represent? Is it possible that the true fault lies not with the individuals but with the political system itself?
VBNguyen Van B
Lamartine’s comment is a cynical take on the idea of public service. Comparing politicians to dogs highlights the sense of betrayal many people feel when representatives fail to live up to their promises. But is this just a reflection of frustration with current politics, or does it suggest a more universal truth about how power often corrupts? Can political figures ever embody the same loyalty and integrity that animals seem to possess?
TTLe thi Thanh
This quote strikes a chord with anyone who feels let down by political representatives. Lamartine seems to be saying that the more he observes politicians, the more he appreciates the straightforward, honest nature of animals. But is it fair to make such a stark comparison? Could this perspective be shaped by disillusionment with the political system, or does it highlight a deeper truth about human behavior in positions of power?