The same people who are murdered slowly in the mechanized

The same people who are murdered slowly in the mechanized

22/09/2025
23/10/2025

The same people who are murdered slowly in the mechanized slaughterhouses of work are also arguing, singing, drinking, dancing, making love, holding the streets, picking up weapons and inventing a new poetry.

The same people who are murdered slowly in the mechanized
The same people who are murdered slowly in the mechanized
The same people who are murdered slowly in the mechanized slaughterhouses of work are also arguing, singing, drinking, dancing, making love, holding the streets, picking up weapons and inventing a new poetry.
The same people who are murdered slowly in the mechanized
The same people who are murdered slowly in the mechanized slaughterhouses of work are also arguing, singing, drinking, dancing, making love, holding the streets, picking up weapons and inventing a new poetry.
The same people who are murdered slowly in the mechanized
The same people who are murdered slowly in the mechanized slaughterhouses of work are also arguing, singing, drinking, dancing, making love, holding the streets, picking up weapons and inventing a new poetry.
The same people who are murdered slowly in the mechanized
The same people who are murdered slowly in the mechanized slaughterhouses of work are also arguing, singing, drinking, dancing, making love, holding the streets, picking up weapons and inventing a new poetry.
The same people who are murdered slowly in the mechanized
The same people who are murdered slowly in the mechanized slaughterhouses of work are also arguing, singing, drinking, dancing, making love, holding the streets, picking up weapons and inventing a new poetry.
The same people who are murdered slowly in the mechanized
The same people who are murdered slowly in the mechanized slaughterhouses of work are also arguing, singing, drinking, dancing, making love, holding the streets, picking up weapons and inventing a new poetry.
The same people who are murdered slowly in the mechanized
The same people who are murdered slowly in the mechanized slaughterhouses of work are also arguing, singing, drinking, dancing, making love, holding the streets, picking up weapons and inventing a new poetry.
The same people who are murdered slowly in the mechanized
The same people who are murdered slowly in the mechanized slaughterhouses of work are also arguing, singing, drinking, dancing, making love, holding the streets, picking up weapons and inventing a new poetry.
The same people who are murdered slowly in the mechanized
The same people who are murdered slowly in the mechanized slaughterhouses of work are also arguing, singing, drinking, dancing, making love, holding the streets, picking up weapons and inventing a new poetry.
The same people who are murdered slowly in the mechanized
The same people who are murdered slowly in the mechanized
The same people who are murdered slowly in the mechanized
The same people who are murdered slowly in the mechanized
The same people who are murdered slowly in the mechanized
The same people who are murdered slowly in the mechanized
The same people who are murdered slowly in the mechanized
The same people who are murdered slowly in the mechanized
The same people who are murdered slowly in the mechanized
The same people who are murdered slowly in the mechanized

"The same people who are murdered slowly in the mechanized slaughterhouses of work are also arguing, singing, drinking, dancing, making love, holding the streets, picking up weapons and inventing a new poetry." — so spoke Raoul Vaneigem, the Belgian writer and revolutionary, whose words sprang from the fiery heart of the Situationist movement in the 1960s. In this declaration he names the paradox of the modern age: that even while the daily grind of labor drains men and women of their vitality, they still rise in defiance, expressing themselves through joy, rebellion, creation, and love. He names the human spirit as indestructible, a flame that flickers but does not die, even within the iron walls of oppression.

The "mechanized slaughterhouses of work" are not literal, but metaphors of the modern condition. In a society where human beings are reduced to cogs in machines, where work is alienated from joy, where labor consumes life without giving meaning, people are, as Vaneigem says, "murdered slowly." Their time is stolen, their freedom curtailed, their imagination numbed. Yet this is not the end of the story. For even within such a system, the same people who labor endlessly are also the ones who laugh, who fall in love, who sing songs at night, who gather in streets to demand freedom, who write poetry that challenges the very forces that oppress them.

Consider, O listener, the uprising of May 1968 in Paris, from which Vaneigem’s thought springs. Students, workers, poets, and dreamers filled the streets with chants, graffiti, and barricades. They were the same ones who spent long days in factories, in schools, in offices where their souls were smothered. Yet in their rebellion they danced, they made art, they kissed under banners of freedom, they wrote verses on walls that read: "Under the paving stones, the beach!" In those days, they embodied the quote: people crushed by labor, yet creating a new poetry of resistance, of life reclaimed.

This paradox is not unique to Paris. In every age, the oppressed have turned their pain into song. The African American spirituals, born in the fields of slavery, carried both lamentation and defiance. Sung by those whose bodies were broken by labor, these songs held faith, hope, and rebellion in their rhythm. The same people forced into suffering were also the ones who invented a new poetry that gave strength to generations. Thus Vaneigem’s words find echoes across continents and centuries: the human spirit creates beauty even in chains, and through that beauty it begins to break the chains.

The lesson here is not only about survival, but about resistance. Vaneigem calls us to recognize that joy, creativity, and rebellion are themselves acts of defiance against systems that seek to dehumanize. When people sing after work, when they dance in streets, when they love in defiance of oppression, they reclaim what was stolen. And when they turn this energy into collective action — holding streets, raising weapons, writing revolutionary poetry — they not only resist death, they invent new life.

What, then, should we learn? It is this: never believe that oppression has destroyed the human spirit. Even where life seems most mechanized, most controlled, most stripped of meaning, the seeds of laughter and rebellion are growing. You too can choose to resist not only through protest but through joy — by creating, by loving, by refusing to let your spirit be reduced to a tool. For in every small act of beauty, you declare: "I am more than what the system demands. I am human."

Practical action follows: do not surrender all your hours to the "slaughterhouses of work." Protect spaces of joy, of art, of solidarity. Sing even if the world is silent, write even if no one listens, gather with others even if power disapproves. Remember that resistance is not only in protest marches but in every act of human connection that cannot be commodified. By living poetically, you strengthen the collective spirit, and together you invent a new poetry that may one day topple the systems that bind.

Thus, Vaneigem’s words endure as a battle cry and a song of hope: though people may be worn down by the grind of labor, they remain capable of invention, of passion, of rebellion. The world may try to kill them slowly, but they will keep singing, keep dancing, keep loving — and in that persistence lies the seed of a new future, radiant and free. This is the power of poetry, the poetry of life itself.

Raoul Vaneigem
Raoul Vaneigem

Belgian - Philosopher Born: March 21, 1934

Tocpics Related
Notable authors
Have 6 Comment The same people who are murdered slowly in the mechanized

TSHoang Tuan Son

What strikes me in this quote is the idea that even as people suffer in the 'slaughterhouses' of work, they continue to fight for their own freedom through art, protest, and personal expression. How do these moments of joy and resistance coexist with the grind of daily labor? Are they fleeting escapes, or do they have the power to bring lasting change? Could the 'new poetry' represent a shift toward a deeper understanding of human potential beyond work?

Reply.
Information sender

PLNguyen Phan Phuc Loi

This quote captures the duality of human experience in the modern world. On one side, people are ground down by the repetitive nature of work, yet on the other, they still engage in acts of rebellion, creation, and love. How do we reconcile these contradictions? Is the act of ‘making love’ and ‘picking up weapons’ an expression of resistance, or are they separate ways of coping with an otherwise oppressive system? I wonder if Vaneigem is suggesting that personal liberation can coexist with societal struggle.

Reply.
Information sender

Ssau

Vaneigem's words are both beautiful and haunting, showing how people can be crushed by systems, yet still find ways to resist and create. But what does he mean by 'new poetry'? Does it represent an entirely new way of seeing and expressing life? Or is he suggesting that rebellion itself becomes a form of poetry—a form of art that transcends traditional boundaries and speaks to the soul’s need for freedom and expression?

Reply.
Information sender

TLvo tan loc

Vaneigem seems to be pointing out the contradiction within society: people are both oppressed by work and empowered to create change. But how does this transformation happen? What drives people to shift from surviving a system that degrades them to inventing something revolutionary, like a new poetry? I’m curious about the concept of ‘inventing a new poetry’ – is it literal, or does it symbolize broader social and cultural shifts toward liberation?

Reply.
Information sender

LPLinh Phuong

This quote really makes me think about the tension between our roles as workers and our roles as individuals capable of deeper, more fulfilling experiences. How is it that we endure the monotony and pain of work but still manage to fight back and create? Is there a balance between survival and resistance, and can that balance truly bring about change? I wonder if art, music, and rebellion are our tools to regain our humanity in a mechanized world.

Reply.
Information sender
Leave the question
Click here to rate
Information sender