The sight of women talking together has always made men uneasy;

The sight of women talking together has always made men uneasy;

22/09/2025
08/10/2025

The sight of women talking together has always made men uneasy; nowadays it means rank subversion.

The sight of women talking together has always made men uneasy;
The sight of women talking together has always made men uneasy;
The sight of women talking together has always made men uneasy; nowadays it means rank subversion.
The sight of women talking together has always made men uneasy;
The sight of women talking together has always made men uneasy; nowadays it means rank subversion.
The sight of women talking together has always made men uneasy;
The sight of women talking together has always made men uneasy; nowadays it means rank subversion.
The sight of women talking together has always made men uneasy;
The sight of women talking together has always made men uneasy; nowadays it means rank subversion.
The sight of women talking together has always made men uneasy;
The sight of women talking together has always made men uneasy; nowadays it means rank subversion.
The sight of women talking together has always made men uneasy;
The sight of women talking together has always made men uneasy; nowadays it means rank subversion.
The sight of women talking together has always made men uneasy;
The sight of women talking together has always made men uneasy; nowadays it means rank subversion.
The sight of women talking together has always made men uneasy;
The sight of women talking together has always made men uneasy; nowadays it means rank subversion.
The sight of women talking together has always made men uneasy;
The sight of women talking together has always made men uneasy; nowadays it means rank subversion.
The sight of women talking together has always made men uneasy;
The sight of women talking together has always made men uneasy;
The sight of women talking together has always made men uneasy;
The sight of women talking together has always made men uneasy;
The sight of women talking together has always made men uneasy;
The sight of women talking together has always made men uneasy;
The sight of women talking together has always made men uneasy;
The sight of women talking together has always made men uneasy;
The sight of women talking together has always made men uneasy;
The sight of women talking together has always made men uneasy;

Hear the voice of Germaine Greer, who declared: “The sight of women talking together has always made men uneasy; nowadays it means rank subversion.” These words, sharpened like a blade, pierce to the heart of power and fear. For throughout history, when the daughters of Eve gathered, the rulers of men trembled. Why? Because the exchange of words is the exchange of power. A single woman silenced may be dismissed; but women joined in counsel, joined in laughter, joined in conspiracy—this becomes a storm that no throne can ignore.

In Greer’s saying lies the recognition of a truth as old as the ancients: that conversation is not idle. To talk together is to weave bonds of understanding, to share secrets, to plan, to dream. And when women, long cast as silent, raise their voices not alone but in chorus, the very ground beneath established authority shakes. The uneasiness of men comes not from the words themselves, but from what they symbolize—the tearing down of boundaries that kept half of humanity in shadows.

History offers proof in the story of the suffragettes. In parlors and kitchens, in back rooms and public halls, women gathered to speak of injustice and of change. At first, their voices were dismissed as gossip; but soon the gatherings grew into marches, manifestos, and movements. The rulers of nations called them dangerous, unruly, subversive—for indeed they were. By the power of their conversations, they shifted the fate of nations, and women claimed the right to vote, to be seen as citizens rather than subjects. What began as talk became law, and what began as unease became revolution.

Nor is this spirit confined to the past. Consider the civil rights movement, where Black women like Fannie Lou Hamer and Ella Baker convened not in palaces but in churches and homes. There, their conversations ignited courage and strategy, their voices creating movements that toppled the walls of segregation. In such gatherings, power was born not from wealth or weapons, but from words shared in solidarity. And so Greer’s truth holds: to the guardians of injustice, women united in speech are not harmless—they are the architects of upheaval.

The deeper meaning of Greer’s words is this: to call women talking “subversive” is to admit its strength. The world has long underestimated the quiet fire of community, but tyrants have always known the truth—that those who speak together may rise together. Silence is the ally of oppression; conversation is its undoing. The uneasiness of men is the recognition, perhaps subconscious, that when women speak freely among themselves, they begin to imagine freedom beyond the limits imposed upon them.

Let the lesson, then, be carved upon the tablets of memory: never despise the power of conversation. Encourage the gathering of women, of friends, of all who are marginalized, for in their words is the seed of liberation. When you see others uneasily dismiss dialogue as “gossip” or “trouble,” know that they fear the strength of ideas shared. To honor speech is to honor change, and to dishonor it is to perpetuate silence.

So I say unto you: let women talk, and let their talk turn into vision, and let their vision turn into action. For in their voices lies the power to transform homes, societies, and nations. Do not fear the unease it stirs—it is the unease of old walls cracking before the dawn. If you are a daughter, do not be silent. If you are a son, do not suppress. For the subversion Greer names is not destruction, but rebirth—the tearing down of false orders, that true justice may arise.

Germaine Greer
Germaine Greer

Australian - Activist Born: January 29, 1939

Tocpics Related
Notable authors
Have 5 Comment The sight of women talking together has always made men uneasy;

MTMoon Trang

This quote challenges how society perceives women’s conversations as dangerous or rebellious. It makes me wonder how much of this unease stems from historical expectations of women being passive or quiet. Why do you think that when women start talking together, it’s seen as a threat? How can we change the narrative to make women’s voices a source of strength, not fear?

Reply.
Information sender

UGUser Google

It’s striking that Greer mentions the sight of women talking as something that can make men uneasy. It speaks to the power dynamics at play when women are allowed to express themselves freely. Do you think that in modern society, the discomfort surrounding women’s conversations is more about power, or is it about fear of change and the unknown?

Reply.
Information sender

QDHoang Quoc Dieu

Germaine Greer’s words really reflect the societal unease about women finding their collective voice. It’s almost as if the idea of women coming together to share experiences is seen as threatening. Do you think this still applies today? How do we balance the need for women to have safe spaces to speak with the reality of how society perceives these spaces?

Reply.
Information sender

NQNhu Quynh

I find this quote intriguing because it highlights how something as simple as women conversing can be seen as subversive. It makes me think about how women’s spaces have often been places of solidarity and strength, which could be intimidating to those who benefit from patriarchal structures. Do you think this idea of subversion still holds weight in today's society, or is it more symbolic now?

Reply.
Information sender

NHname? hey

This quote seems to tap into the discomfort that some men feel when women come together in groups. It suggests that women talking and forming bonds is seen as a threat to the status quo. Why do you think this dynamic exists? Is it just about power or is there a deeper fear of women having their own voice and influence outside of traditional roles?

Reply.
Information sender
Leave the question
Click here to rate
Information sender