The vote means nothing to women. We should be armed.

The vote means nothing to women. We should be armed.

22/09/2025
22/09/2025

The vote means nothing to women. We should be armed.

The vote means nothing to women. We should be armed.
The vote means nothing to women. We should be armed.
The vote means nothing to women. We should be armed.
The vote means nothing to women. We should be armed.
The vote means nothing to women. We should be armed.
The vote means nothing to women. We should be armed.
The vote means nothing to women. We should be armed.
The vote means nothing to women. We should be armed.
The vote means nothing to women. We should be armed.
The vote means nothing to women. We should be armed.
The vote means nothing to women. We should be armed.
The vote means nothing to women. We should be armed.
The vote means nothing to women. We should be armed.
The vote means nothing to women. We should be armed.
The vote means nothing to women. We should be armed.
The vote means nothing to women. We should be armed.
The vote means nothing to women. We should be armed.
The vote means nothing to women. We should be armed.
The vote means nothing to women. We should be armed.
The vote means nothing to women. We should be armed.
The vote means nothing to women. We should be armed.
The vote means nothing to women. We should be armed.
The vote means nothing to women. We should be armed.
The vote means nothing to women. We should be armed.
The vote means nothing to women. We should be armed.
The vote means nothing to women. We should be armed.
The vote means nothing to women. We should be armed.
The vote means nothing to women. We should be armed.
The vote means nothing to women. We should be armed.

Edna O’Brien, fierce chronicler of women’s struggles, once uttered words that shook like thunder: “The vote means nothing to women. We should be armed.” This was no idle provocation, but a cry of rage at the slow machinery of change, at the centuries in which rights on paper failed to shield women from violence, subjugation, and silence. The vote, hard-won and celebrated, was for her insufficient when laws still bent toward men and when power ignored the daily realities of women’s suffering. To be armed was not only to carry weapons of steel, but to be fortified in spirit, to claim strength rather than wait for deliverance.

The origin of this cry can be traced to O’Brien’s own life. An Irish novelist, she dared to speak openly of women’s desires and torments in a society that sought to silence them. For this, she was scorned, censored, and cast out by the very institutions that claimed moral authority. She saw clearly that political rights, though necessary, did not guarantee freedom in practice. Thus her fierce statement: until women are armed with courage, knowledge, and sometimes even force, the promises of equality remain fragile.

History offers us the fiery example of the suffragettes in Britain, who, when peaceful petitions failed, turned to militancy under the banner of Emmeline Pankhurst. Windows were smashed, fires were lit, and chains were broken in protest. These women, though vilified, forced a nation to reckon with their demands. Their “arms” were not only stones and fire, but the unyielding will to disrupt a system that mocked their patience. O’Brien’s words echo their spirit: when rights are ignored, resistance must grow sharper.

There is also the story of Sojourner Truth, who declared, “I have as much muscle as any man, and can do as much work as any man.” Her “arming” was her body, her voice, her indomitable presence. She did not wait for permission to be recognized, but claimed her own power, shaming those who denied her humanity. Her life is a living testament to O’Brien’s conviction that women must not rely solely on the parchment of rights but must seize the mantle of strength.

Therefore, O daughters of tomorrow, let O’Brien’s fire dwell within you. Take the vote, but do not be lulled into believing it alone can shield you. Arm yourselves with education, with solidarity, with defiance, and yes, with the courage to confront a world that resists your freedom. For power respects not words alone but the force behind them. The true weapon of women is the refusal to be silenced, the refusal to be meek, the refusal to wait. And with such arms, no promise of liberty can ever again be denied.

Edna O'Brien
Edna O'Brien

Irish - Novelist Born: December 15, 1932

Tocpics Related
Notable authors
Have 6 Comment The vote means nothing to women. We should be armed.

TNLy Thi Thao Nguyen

I find this quote troubling but thought-provoking. It’s clear that O’Brien feels the political system has failed women, but does this mean the solution is violence? Perhaps this is a radical way of expressing the need for women to reclaim power in a system that has historically sidelined them. How can we, as a society, create more opportunities for women to have a voice that is actually heard and acted upon, without resorting to extremes?

Reply.
Information sender

GGshoot431

Edna O’Brien’s words seem to suggest that traditional methods of political engagement, like voting, are insufficient in giving women power. But does that mean we should be resorting to armed resistance? I understand the frustration behind the quote, but I believe the real solution lies in improving the political system to make it more inclusive and responsive to women’s needs. How can we create better systems that allow women’s voices to truly matter?

Reply.
Information sender

KDkhanh day

This quote is a strong, rebellious statement about the lack of power women feel in society. While I understand the sentiment behind it, I’m left questioning whether violence is ever the right answer to political oppression. Could this be a reflection of how women have been historically marginalized, making them feel as though their votes and voices mean little? What would it look like to truly empower women through non-violent, systemic change?

Reply.
Information sender

MNLe Nguyen Minh Ngoc

O’Brien’s statement sounds like an expression of deep frustration with the political system’s failure to truly address women’s needs. However, can armed resistance truly be the solution to inequality, or does it just create more division and harm? How can we channel that anger into productive actions? Should women’s empowerment focus more on strategic, non-violent means like organizing and policy reform rather than a call for armed resistance?

Reply.
Information sender

IIIrisxtyn Irs

This quote feels extreme, yet I can see the frustration behind it. For many women, the fight for their rights hasn’t been fully realized, even in democratic societies. But does advocating for violence really offer a better solution than voting or peaceful protest? Perhaps O’Brien is highlighting the gap between what women are promised politically and what they are given. Should we consider how political systems can be improved rather than turning to drastic measures?

Reply.
Information sender
Leave the question
Click here to rate
Information sender