Then somebody suggested I should write about the war, and I said

Then somebody suggested I should write about the war, and I said

22/09/2025
19/10/2025

Then somebody suggested I should write about the war, and I said I didn't know anything about the war. I did not understand anything about it. I didn't see how I could write it.

Then somebody suggested I should write about the war, and I said
Then somebody suggested I should write about the war, and I said
Then somebody suggested I should write about the war, and I said I didn't know anything about the war. I did not understand anything about it. I didn't see how I could write it.
Then somebody suggested I should write about the war, and I said
Then somebody suggested I should write about the war, and I said I didn't know anything about the war. I did not understand anything about it. I didn't see how I could write it.
Then somebody suggested I should write about the war, and I said
Then somebody suggested I should write about the war, and I said I didn't know anything about the war. I did not understand anything about it. I didn't see how I could write it.
Then somebody suggested I should write about the war, and I said
Then somebody suggested I should write about the war, and I said I didn't know anything about the war. I did not understand anything about it. I didn't see how I could write it.
Then somebody suggested I should write about the war, and I said
Then somebody suggested I should write about the war, and I said I didn't know anything about the war. I did not understand anything about it. I didn't see how I could write it.
Then somebody suggested I should write about the war, and I said
Then somebody suggested I should write about the war, and I said I didn't know anything about the war. I did not understand anything about it. I didn't see how I could write it.
Then somebody suggested I should write about the war, and I said
Then somebody suggested I should write about the war, and I said I didn't know anything about the war. I did not understand anything about it. I didn't see how I could write it.
Then somebody suggested I should write about the war, and I said
Then somebody suggested I should write about the war, and I said I didn't know anything about the war. I did not understand anything about it. I didn't see how I could write it.
Then somebody suggested I should write about the war, and I said
Then somebody suggested I should write about the war, and I said I didn't know anything about the war. I did not understand anything about it. I didn't see how I could write it.
Then somebody suggested I should write about the war, and I said
Then somebody suggested I should write about the war, and I said
Then somebody suggested I should write about the war, and I said
Then somebody suggested I should write about the war, and I said
Then somebody suggested I should write about the war, and I said
Then somebody suggested I should write about the war, and I said
Then somebody suggested I should write about the war, and I said
Then somebody suggested I should write about the war, and I said
Then somebody suggested I should write about the war, and I said
Then somebody suggested I should write about the war, and I said

In the tapestry of human history, where war has been woven into the very fabric of countless generations, there exists a profound paradox: the struggle to truly understand and articulate the nature of war. Martha Gellhorn, one of the greatest war correspondents of the 20th century, captures this tension in her own words: "Then somebody suggested I should write about the war, and I said I didn't know anything about the war. I did not understand anything about it. I didn't see how I could write it." These words, though simple, reveal the very essence of what it means to confront the chaos and suffering of war—and the difficulty of translating that experience into something comprehensible, something that can truly be understood by those who have not lived it.

Gellhorn, in her reflection, speaks to the profound disconnect that exists between those who witness the horrors of war and those who only hear about it from the outside. War, in its true form, is something that cannot be easily understood or described. The trauma, the grief, the senseless violence—these are experiences that defy language. Gellhorn, a woman who had seen war firsthand, understood that to write about it would require more than mere words; it would demand an understanding of the deep emotional scars left by battle, an understanding that transcends the intellectual and touches the very soul of humanity.

Consider the great writers of war, like Ernest Hemingway, who, like Gellhorn, had lived through war and sought to write about it. Hemingway’s works, such as A Farewell to Arms and For Whom the Bell Tolls, are not just stories of conflict; they are the reflections of men and women shattered by the devastation of war, struggling to find meaning in a world that has lost its clarity. These writers, who could not help but be shaped by the brutality of their experiences, struggle not only with the violence they witnessed but with the daunting task of recounting it. For to write about war is not to recount battles or victories—it is to confront the rawness of human suffering, to attempt to capture the unspoken grief that war leaves behind.

Gellhorn’s hesitation—her belief that she could not write about war because she did not truly understand it—is an acknowledgment of the humbling truth that war, in its purest form, is an experience beyond comprehension. It is not simply the tactical movements on a battlefield or the strategies of generals; it is the lives torn apart, the dreams lost, and the invisible wounds that cannot be seen by the eye but remain with the individual forever. Writing about war requires not just knowledge of the physical details, but an emotional courage to face the horror and absurdity of it all—an emotional courage that Gellhorn, in her wisdom, feared she lacked.

Yet, Gellhorn did write about war, and in her writings, she became one of the greatest voices of the human cost of conflict. She chronicled the Spanish Civil War, World War II, and the Vietnam War, and through her words, the unspeakable truths of war were brought to light. Her courage to write, despite the immense weight of not understanding fully, serves as a reminder that sometimes, even in the face of uncertainty and personal doubt, we must move forward. The difficulty of understanding war does not negate the need to speak about it. In fact, it often compels us to speak, for only through the telling of the stories, no matter how fragmented or incomplete, can the human experience in all its complexity be honored.

What, then, is the lesson for us? In our own lives, we must recognize that the world is full of experiences that are difficult, if not impossible, to fully understand. We may find ourselves confronted with situations of great suffering, great injustice, or personal struggle that seem beyond our comprehension. Yet, it is in our effort to engage with these experiences, to listen, to learn, and to speak, that we find growth and understanding. Like Gellhorn, we may feel we do not fully understand the world we live in, but that should not stop us from acting, from engaging, from writing our own stories—to share our truths, however fragmented, and to allow those stories to shape the world around us.

In the end, Martha Gellhorn’s words serve as a timeless reminder that understanding is not a prerequisite for action. In the face of the great challenges of life, we must take the step forward, even when we feel unprepared, even when the full meaning eludes us. In writing, in speaking, and in living, we have the power to bring the invisible into the light, to share the experiences of others, and to help heal the wounds of a world often marked by confusion and despair. It is through this willingness to engage with the unknown that we find our own purpose, our own voice, and our place in the unfolding story of humanity.

Martha Gellhorn
Martha Gellhorn

American - Journalist November 8, 1908 - February 15, 1998

Tocpics Related
Notable authors
Have 4 Comment Then somebody suggested I should write about the war, and I said

VNHuong Pham Vinh Nguyen

Gellhorn’s admission highlights the challenges writers face when tasked with covering something as daunting as war. It raises the question: can a writer ever truly 'know' war if they haven't experienced it firsthand? Does writing about war without direct experience risk misrepresenting the truth? At what point does personal involvement become necessary for authenticity, and how can writers ensure they don’t oversimplify or romanticize such a profound and destructive event?

Reply.
Information sender

HNLe Hoai Nam

I can relate to Gellhorn’s feeling of not knowing enough to write about something as complex and harrowing as war. Writing about war requires not only an understanding of the events but also a deep connection to the human experiences behind them. How do you make sense of something as overwhelming as war without personal insight? Can the right words even convey what it's truly like, or is there always a gap in understanding?

Reply.
Information sender

HHNguyen Hong Hanh

Gellhorn’s hesitation about writing on war is striking, especially considering her legacy as a war correspondent. It makes me wonder if the best way to write about war is to first confront its chaos and trauma directly, instead of relying on second-hand knowledge. How can writers or journalists capture the true essence of war when they haven't directly been part of it? Does the emotional toll of war ever truly leave someone once they step away?

Reply.
Information sender

VGTran Van Giap

Martha Gellhorn’s reluctance to write about the war is understandable. It speaks to the idea that true understanding and empathy come only from personal experience. Can one truly write about war without having lived through it? What does it take to capture the rawness and complexity of such a profound human experience? Is it possible to authentically convey the realities of war from an external perspective, or is lived experience essential?

Reply.
Information sender
Leave the question
Click here to rate
Information sender