War consisteth not in battle only, or the act of fighting; but

War consisteth not in battle only, or the act of fighting; but

22/09/2025
19/10/2025

War consisteth not in battle only, or the act of fighting; but in a tract of time, wherein the will to contend by battle is sufficiently known.

War consisteth not in battle only, or the act of fighting; but
War consisteth not in battle only, or the act of fighting; but
War consisteth not in battle only, or the act of fighting; but in a tract of time, wherein the will to contend by battle is sufficiently known.
War consisteth not in battle only, or the act of fighting; but
War consisteth not in battle only, or the act of fighting; but in a tract of time, wherein the will to contend by battle is sufficiently known.
War consisteth not in battle only, or the act of fighting; but
War consisteth not in battle only, or the act of fighting; but in a tract of time, wherein the will to contend by battle is sufficiently known.
War consisteth not in battle only, or the act of fighting; but
War consisteth not in battle only, or the act of fighting; but in a tract of time, wherein the will to contend by battle is sufficiently known.
War consisteth not in battle only, or the act of fighting; but
War consisteth not in battle only, or the act of fighting; but in a tract of time, wherein the will to contend by battle is sufficiently known.
War consisteth not in battle only, or the act of fighting; but
War consisteth not in battle only, or the act of fighting; but in a tract of time, wherein the will to contend by battle is sufficiently known.
War consisteth not in battle only, or the act of fighting; but
War consisteth not in battle only, or the act of fighting; but in a tract of time, wherein the will to contend by battle is sufficiently known.
War consisteth not in battle only, or the act of fighting; but
War consisteth not in battle only, or the act of fighting; but in a tract of time, wherein the will to contend by battle is sufficiently known.
War consisteth not in battle only, or the act of fighting; but
War consisteth not in battle only, or the act of fighting; but in a tract of time, wherein the will to contend by battle is sufficiently known.
War consisteth not in battle only, or the act of fighting; but
War consisteth not in battle only, or the act of fighting; but
War consisteth not in battle only, or the act of fighting; but
War consisteth not in battle only, or the act of fighting; but
War consisteth not in battle only, or the act of fighting; but
War consisteth not in battle only, or the act of fighting; but
War consisteth not in battle only, or the act of fighting; but
War consisteth not in battle only, or the act of fighting; but
War consisteth not in battle only, or the act of fighting; but
War consisteth not in battle only, or the act of fighting; but

In the long and tumultuous history of human conflict, where battles have raged and empires have risen and fallen, there is a profound truth often overlooked: that war is not solely defined by the clashing of swords or the roar of cannons, but by the will to fight, the desire to impose one's will upon others through force. Thomas Hobbes, the great English philosopher, grasped this truth with striking clarity when he wrote, "War consisteth not in battle only, or the act of fighting; but in a tract of time, wherein the will to contend by battle is sufficiently known." These words invite us to reflect not just on the violence of war, but on the period of tension that precedes it, the moment when the intention to fight has taken root in the hearts of men and nations.

Hobbes’ insight is a deep one: war is not simply an event, a moment of fighting, but an ongoing state of conflict, one in which the will to fight is present, even if the battle has not yet been fought. The conflict between two peoples or nations may simmer beneath the surface for years, long before the first weapon is drawn. The mere knowledge that a nation or group is prepared to fight, that they desire to impose their will through force, is enough to create the atmosphere of war. It is in this tract of time, when the sword is drawn but not yet unsheathed, that the true essence of war is felt—the fear, the uncertainty, the dread of what is to come.

Consider the Cold War between the United States and the Soviet Union, a period in which the world teetered on the edge of nuclear disaster without a single bullet being fired. From the end of World War II until the collapse of the Soviet Union, the world was gripped in a long, simmering conflict that never escalated into direct combat. The will to fight was understood by both sides—the arms race, the political rhetoric, and the constant threat of nuclear war created a state of persistent tension. In this sense, the Cold War was as much a war as any other, even though it did not involve direct battle. The very knowledge that both sides were willing to engage in battle at any moment made it a war in the truest sense.

Hobbes’ words are not confined to international conflicts but extend to the internal struggles that shape our personal lives. The will to fight is not always manifested through physical confrontation, but through the emotional and psychological tension that lingers in a conflict. In a dispute between families, a long-standing feud, or even in the quiet disagreements that arise in our relationships, war is not defined by the moment when words are exchanged, but by the underlying tension, the silent understanding that battle could erupt at any time. This is the tract of time Hobbes speaks of—the quiet before the storm, where the threat of violence or discord hangs over everything, and the resolve to fight is the true condition of war.

In ancient times, consider the story of the Peloponnesian War between Athens and Sparta. For years, the two great Greek city-states engaged in a cold war—a period of uneasy peace punctuated by small-scale skirmishes and strategic alliances, but neither side fully engaged in direct warfare. The tension between them was palpable, and the knowledge that each had the capacity to fight created a war-like atmosphere throughout Greece. When the war finally did break out in 431 BC, it was not merely the result of a sudden outbreak of hostilities, but the culmination of years of preparation, fear, and political maneuvering. Both sides had long been preparing for battle, and the war had been fought long before the first spear was thrown.

The lesson that Hobbes imparts is one of vigilance and awareness. War, in its deepest sense, is not just about the battlefield—it is about the moment when the will to fight becomes clear, when the knowledge of impending conflict takes root and begins to shape the actions of both sides. In our personal lives, we must be mindful of this dynamic. The will to fight often begins with small grievances, misunderstandings, or unspoken fears. If left unchecked, these tensions can fester and lead to larger confrontations. Hobbes urges us to recognize that conflict is not only physical; it is psychological, emotional, and moral—a battle fought in the heart before it is ever fought in the field.

Let us, then, take Hobbes' wisdom to heart. In all of our struggles, whether personal, societal, or global, we must remember that war is not just the battle we see; it is the tension that builds long before. In our relationships, workplaces, and societies, we must be mindful of the traces of conflict that simmer beneath the surface and work to resolve them before they escalate. Understanding the will to fight, the psychological preparation for battle, allows us to act with foresight and wisdom, preventing conflict before it reaches the point of no return. Peace is not just the absence of fighting—it is the presence of understanding, of knowing that war begins not in the clash of arms, but in the hearts of men. Let us strive to keep that knowledge within our hearts, and seek to resolve our conflicts with wisdom and forethought, long before the first blow is struck.

Thomas Hobbes
Thomas Hobbes

English - Philosopher April 5, 1588 - December 4, 1679

Tocpics Related
Notable authors
Have 4 Comment War consisteth not in battle only, or the act of fighting; but

HTHuyen Tram

Hobbes’ idea that war is more than just battle, but a process defined by the willingness to fight, changes the way we view the causes of war. It makes me wonder how often conflicts are driven by a readiness for violence that emerges during long periods of tension. How much of war is shaped by strategy and posturing in these critical moments, rather than just immediate battles? How do we manage these tensions before they spiral into full conflict?

Reply.
Information sender

TQNguyen thi thu quyen

Hobbes’ perspective on war as a state of mind rather than just physical battle challenges how we traditionally think about conflict. If war begins with the knowledge that one side is willing to fight, doesn’t that suggest that prevention must involve addressing the willingness to engage in battle, rather than just preparing for it? What steps can be taken to reduce the ‘will to contend,’ and is it even possible to remove this instinctual drive for conflict in human nature?

Reply.
Information sender

HNMinh Anh Ha Nguyen

Hobbes’ definition of war seems to expand beyond traditional ideas of battle. It suggests that war begins long before the first shot is fired, in the minds and strategies of those involved. This idea really makes me question: Does the mere will to fight create war, even without actual combat? How do we control this will, both on a national and individual level, to prevent unnecessary conflict from escalating into something destructive?

Reply.
Information sender

==))

Thomas Hobbes’ quote makes me think about the psychological and strategic dimensions of war. It's not just about fighting—it's about the time leading up to the conflict, when both sides know war is imminent. This realization can create fear, anticipation, or even desperation. But can we extend this idea to other aspects of human conflict, such as political or social struggles? Do prolonged periods of tension and uncertainty always escalate into violence, or can they be resolved peacefully?

Reply.
Information sender
Leave the question
Click here to rate
Information sender