There are a number of mechanical devices which increase sexual
There are a number of mechanical devices which increase sexual arousal, particularly in women. Chief among these is the Mercedes-Benz 380SL convertible.
P. J. O’Rourke, satirist of politics and prophet of modern absurdities, once proclaimed with sly humor: “There are a number of mechanical devices which increase sexual arousal, particularly in women. Chief among these is the Mercedes-Benz 380SL convertible.” At first hearing, these words sound like mere jest, but beneath the laughter lies a sharp reflection on desire, materialism, and status. O’Rourke exposes how luxury and power—embodied in a shining machine—often ignite passions more than genuine virtue or character. The automobile, in his wit, becomes less a vehicle than a symbol of wealth and allure.
The origin of this saying lies in O’Rourke’s lifelong craft of wielding humor as critique. Writing in the late twentieth century, he delighted in mocking consumerism and the vanities of modern life. The Mercedes-Benz 380SL, a gleaming status symbol of its era, was not merely a car but a cultural icon—an object that conferred prestige, wealth, and attraction upon its owner. In equating it with arousal, O’Rourke reveals how deeply human desire has been entangled with possessions, and how often mechanical devices of luxury stir the heart more quickly than qualities of the soul.
History itself confirms the power of symbols to stir desire. In the Gilded Age, men flaunted diamond rings, gilded carriages, and mansions not only for their own enjoyment but to attract admiration and love. Women, bound within a society that often measured security through a husband’s wealth, learned to see such symbols as signs of promise or survival. O’Rourke’s wit pierces this old truth: the glittering machine is as much a weapon of seduction as beauty itself.
Consider also the tale of Jay Gatsby, though born of fiction, who adorned himself with mansions and motorcars to win Daisy’s heart. His wealth became the beacon of his desirability, proving that possessions can inflame longing where words and deeds fail. O’Rourke, in his quip, echoes this ancient pattern with modern tongue: a luxury car may rouse passions more swiftly than poetry or philosophy.
Therefore, O seekers of wisdom, laugh, but also learn. The Mercedes-Benz 380SL is not merely a jest, but a parable of misplaced desire. It reminds us that attraction often bows before symbols of wealth and power, though true love lies deeper than chrome and leather. O’Rourke’s words carry both jest and warning: pleasure won by possessions may sparkle, but it is fleeting. For what intoxicates the senses today may rust tomorrow, while only the treasures of spirit endure.
Llo
This quote is humorous, but it also seems to highlight a very materialistic view of attraction. The idea that a car, of all things, could have such an impact on sexual arousal is kind of strange. It makes me think about how often society values external possessions over internal qualities. Is this truly how we want to define what is attractive, or should we be focusing more on meaningful connections rather than what we own?
MManh
I can't help but laugh at this quote, but I also wonder what it says about our society's values. It suggests that the right car can be more arousing than any other device, which seems to reflect how consumer culture often conflates material wealth with attractiveness. But should we be careful about reducing human desire and attraction to material objects? How much is this a reflection of societal expectations versus real human connection?
HGHuong Giang
I think P. J. O'Rourke is trying to make a point about the way material objects, like luxury cars, are sometimes associated with attraction and desire. It’s interesting how society often ties status symbols to concepts like sexual appeal. But how much of this is genuinely about the object, and how much is about the idea of power or status that the object represents? Does owning a Mercedes-Benz really increase sexual arousal, or is it the perception that matters more?
HLHong Lan
This quote seems to be more humorous than serious, playing on the stereotype of luxury cars being symbols of status and allure. I wonder though, is this just a light-hearted joke or is there a deeper commentary about materialism and how society equates objects like cars with attraction or success? It's a fun quote, but it also raises questions about what we value and how those values are sometimes linked to superficial desires.