There's something real in women's intuition. It's an accurate
There's something real in women's intuition. It's an accurate signpost for decision making, but it usually bumps up against man's logic. So we have to put ego aside and listen to them.
The words of Jon Voight, “There’s something real in women’s intuition. It’s an accurate signpost for decision making, but it usually bumps up against man’s logic. So we have to put ego aside and listen to them,” shine with both humility and wisdom. In them he recognizes that truth is not the property of one sex, nor does wisdom flow only through the channel of reason. There is another way of knowing, often dismissed but deeply powerful—an instinct born of empathy, perception, and lived experience.
To call it intuition is to name that hidden current which women, shaped by centuries of silence, have carried as their strength. Where men were trained to measure and calculate, women were trained to observe and endure. Thus, their wisdom grew not from formulas but from the quiet reading of hearts and the unseen connections of life. Voight reminds us that this signpost is no illusion; it is a compass that, when honored, leads more surely than prideful logic alone.
History bears witness to this truth. In the tale of Abigail Adams, wife of America’s second president, she warned her husband John to “remember the ladies” when framing the laws of the new republic. Her intuition foresaw the unrest that would follow if women were denied dignity. He dismissed her with jest, but her words echo as prophecy, fulfilled in the struggles of suffrage and equality. Here, the clash between intuition and logic was not a battle of right versus wrong, but of foresight ignored by arrogance.
The ancients too honored this wisdom. The Greeks told of the Pythia at Delphi, a woman whose visions guided kings and states. Though her words came not from logic but from divine intuition, rulers bent their ears to her counsel, for they knew that truth comes clothed in many garments. To disregard her was peril; to heed her was to walk in harmony with fate. In this, we see Voight’s call to put ego aside—to recognize that wisdom, whether rational or intuitive, must be embraced if one would choose rightly.
So let the children of the future remember: reason without intuition is blind, and intuition without reason is untethered. The greatness of humanity lies in the union of both—the clarity of logic and the depth of intuition. To honor the wisdom of women is not to diminish men, but to complete them. For only when we listen to every voice, setting aside the chains of ego, can we walk the path of truth and make decisions worthy of our highest calling.
YNY Nhu
Voight’s quote about women’s intuition and men’s logic suggests a balance that is often overlooked in decision-making. It also points to a certain level of humility and openness that men need to adopt in order to recognize the value of women’s insights. But what about situations where intuition might not always be accurate? How do we draw the line between intuitive wisdom and overreliance on gut feelings in crucial decisions?
NBngoc bui
Jon Voight highlights an interesting conflict between intuition and logic, especially in how gender roles often shape the way these qualities are perceived. The idea that women’s intuition ‘bumps up against man’s logic’ seems to imply a power struggle. Shouldn't intuition and logic be seen as complementary, rather than conflicting? What does this say about the broader issue of gender dynamics in decision-making and leadership roles in society?
KSKimijuto Sakura
Voight’s statement seems to suggest that women’s intuition is something men should listen to, which is interesting. It makes me think about how often women’s insights are dismissed or undervalued in decision-making processes, especially in male-dominated environments. Why do we so often separate 'intuition' and 'logic,' as if they’re opposing forces? Is there a way for intuition and logic to coexist without diminishing either?
LBLinh Bao
Jon Voight’s quote about women’s intuition and how it often contrasts with men's logic brings up an interesting dynamic. It suggests that women have an innate sense of understanding, which can be vital for decision-making. But does this mean intuition should always take precedence over logic? Can the two be balanced, or do they inherently clash? And why do we have to put ego aside—shouldn't it be about equal respect for both types of decision-making?