Today, hundreds of millions dwell in freedom, from the Baltic to
Today, hundreds of millions dwell in freedom, from the Baltic to the Adriatic, from the Western Approaches to the Aegean. And while we must never take this for granted, the first purpose of the European Union - to secure peace - has been achieved and we should pay tribute to all those in the EU, alongside Nato, who made that happen.
Hear, O children of history, the words spoken by David Cameron, in solemn remembrance and gratitude: “Today, hundreds of millions dwell in freedom, from the Baltic to the Adriatic, from the Western Approaches to the Aegean. And while we must never take this for granted, the first purpose of the European Union – to secure peace – has been achieved and we should pay tribute to all those in the EU, alongside Nato, who made that happen.” This is no empty declaration, but a testimony forged in the memory of centuries drenched in blood, when Europe was torn apart by war, and the dream of peace seemed more distant than the stars.
The origin of these words is the long shadow cast by the 20th century. Twice did Europe devour itself in world wars, dragging millions into fire and ruin. From the ashes of those conflicts arose a new resolve: never again should this continent, once divided by rivalry and empire, return to such destruction. The vision of the European Union was born not merely from treaties or economies, but from a sacred vow—that the peoples of Europe would bind themselves so closely together that war among them would become unthinkable. To say that “peace has been achieved” is to acknowledge the fulfillment, in part, of this vow.
Let us recall the terror of the Second World War. From the Baltic to the Aegean, towns were reduced to rubble, families scattered, entire nations enslaved beneath tyranny. Yet in the aftermath, statesmen such as Schuman, Adenauer, and Monnet labored not to seek vengeance, but to build bridges. They wove steel and coal into bonds of brotherhood, so that industries once used for war would become the foundation of peace. Their work was the seed of the Union, a daring act of trust among peoples who only yesterday had been mortal enemies.
History gives us a shining contrast: before this vision, Europe was a cauldron of endless conflict—the Thirty Years’ War, the Napoleonic Wars, the endless rivalries of kings. In each age, the same soil was drenched with the blood of youth. But in the age of the Union, a miracle unfolded: generations grew up without ever hearing the thunder of warplanes over their homes. Nations that once fought for supremacy now sat at the same table, bound by treaties, commerce, and the dream of shared destiny. Truly, as Cameron declared, “hundreds of millions dwell in freedom,” where once they dwelt in fear.
Yet the warning in his words is also eternal: “we must never take this for granted.” Peace, once won, is not eternal unless guarded. Complacency is the enemy of unity; division and suspicion, if left unchecked, may reopen the wounds of old. The tribute Cameron calls us to give—to the EU, to NATO, to all who built and maintained this fragile peace—is not only gratitude but a reminder that vigilance must continue. The achievement is great, but its preservation demands constant labor.
The lesson for us is clear, O listeners: cherish the blessings of peace, for they are rare in the chronicles of mankind. To live without fear, to travel freely, to raise children under skies untroubled by bombers—these are treasures greater than gold. Do not despise them, nor allow the voices of division to undo what generations labored to build. For if unity collapses, the old specter of conflict will rise again, as it always has in Europe’s past.
Practical action flows from this teaching. Honor the institutions that preserve peace, but more importantly, live as peacemakers in your own communities. Foster understanding across divisions, choose dialogue over bitterness, and remember that the liberty you enjoy was purchased with sacrifice. Teach your children the story of Europe’s wars and Europe’s rebirth, that they may not grow careless in the gift they have inherited. For the work of peace is not done—it is renewed every day, in every hand and every heart.
So remember the words of Cameron, not as a politician’s speech, but as the echo of the ancients: peace is the highest purpose of nations, and unity its surest guardian. The European Union, born of ruin, has kept the sword at bay. Let us give thanks to those who built it, let us protect it with vigilance, and let us never take for granted the miracle of freedom, stretching from the Baltic to the Adriatic, from the Western Approaches to the Aegean. For in peace, mankind finds its truest strength, and in unity, its greatest hope.
GDGold D.dragon
Cameron highlights something truly important—the peace Europe enjoys today is not something to be taken for granted. But I also wonder, do we risk underestimating how fragile peace can be if we don’t actively protect it? In light of rising populism, economic inequality, and migration tensions, how can Europe’s institutions continue to promote stability without alienating certain groups within the EU? Is there a risk of peace being undermined by internal divisions?
TVTrang Vuong
This quote really makes me appreciate the role of the EU and NATO in maintaining peace, but it also raises questions about the future. With recent political shifts and rising tensions, can the EU’s purpose of securing peace be upheld in the long run? What role should the EU play in addressing global conflicts outside of Europe, and how can it strengthen its role in promoting peace globally?
QNThuy quynh Nguyen
David Cameron’s acknowledgment of the EU’s role in securing peace is spot-on, but how much of that peace is the result of economic stability rather than military alliances? It seems like NATO plays a crucial role in the security of Europe as well. In today’s interconnected world, is peace just about economic and military alliances, or is there a greater need for diplomatic engagement and understanding between nations?
GDGold D.dragon
I agree with the sentiment that the EU has been instrumental in securing peace, but I feel like it’s also important to acknowledge the criticisms and challenges it faces today. The EU is often seen as bureaucratic and disconnected from its citizens. Does that affect its ability to maintain peace in Europe? Can the EU adapt to modern challenges without losing the essence of what it was created for in the first place?
TNNguyen Thanh Nam
It’s humbling to think about how far Europe has come in terms of unity and peace, especially when you consider the history of war and conflict in the region. But, looking at the current state of politics, I can't help but question: has the EU done enough to address the challenges facing Europe today, such as economic disparity and migration crises? How do we ensure that the peace Cameron refers to remains sustainable?