Truth is the cry of all, but the game of few.
“Truth is the cry of all, but the game of few.” Thus spoke George Berkeley, the philosopher-bishop, whose gaze pierced the heart of human contradiction. His words reveal a sorrowful wisdom: though every tongue proclaims its hunger for truth, few live by it, fewer still defend it, and fewer yet treat it as their sacred rule. For men and women, when pressed, will cry for truth as the thirsty cry for water; yet when that truth threatens their pride, their wealth, their power, they turn away, preferring comfort to clarity, illusion to reality.
The ancients knew this weakness well. Socrates wandered the streets of Athens, questioning merchants and statesmen, asking only for the truth of their words. Many praised wisdom, many cried for knowledge, yet when Socrates pressed too close, when his questions shattered illusions, they condemned him to death. The cry of truth was upon every lip, but the game of truth—the hard practice of living and seeking it—belonged to one lonely man. Thus Berkeley’s words ring with ancient echoes: most desire the honor of truth, but few accept its burden.
History bears witness again in the tale of Galileo. All Europe cried for knowledge, for the light of reason, for the progress of science. Yet when Galileo unveiled the movements of the heavens, showing that the Earth was not the center of creation, the same voices turned against him. The cry for truth fell silent in the face of fear and authority. Galileo remained among the few who dared to play the game—risking condemnation, imprisonment, and disgrace for the sake of what is. Here the philosopher’s wisdom is laid bare: truth is desired in words but rejected in deeds.
Yet let us not despair. For though the few carry the game, their courage ignites the many. Consider Abraham Lincoln. In an age when the cry of freedom was loud, when all men spoke of liberty, only a few were willing to see the full truth—that slavery was a stain upon the nation’s soul. Lincoln, with quiet strength, took up the game of truth, enduring mockery, resistance, and civil war. His choice cost blood, but it preserved the meaning of liberty for generations. The cry of truth was universal, but it was the few who bore it into action.
Berkeley’s saying is thus both rebuke and challenge. It rebukes the hypocrisy of those who honor truth with their lips but betray it in their lives. Yet it challenges the noble soul: will you remain among the many who only cry for truth, or will you join the few who dare to live by it? To treat truth as a game is not to belittle it, but to recognize it as a contest of strength, discipline, and courage. It is not easily won; it requires sacrifice, endurance, and boldness of heart.
Children of the future, take this to heart: do not be content merely to cry for truth. Let it shape your words, your actions, your character. Speak honestly, even when silence is safer. Act justly, even when injustice is more profitable. Seek reality, even when illusion is more pleasing. Let your life itself become a testimony that truth is not a cry alone, but a practice, a way, a noble game worthy of the strong.
Make it your practice each day to test your heart: have I spoken truthfully? Have I acted with integrity? Have I turned aside from convenience to stand in reality? These small acts, repeated, make you one of the few who honor truth not in words alone but in life. And when history remembers you, let it be said that you did not only cry for truth—you played its game, bravely, until the end.
TTAnh Trieu Tuan
Berkeley’s statement seems to suggest that truth is not just about knowing something, but about actively engaging with it, even when it’s challenging. Is this why so few truly ‘play the game’ of truth? If truth requires effort, discomfort, or a shift in perspective, do we subconsciously avoid it? Does this explain why people often gravitate toward simple, false narratives that are easier to digest? Can we truly understand truth without embracing its complexity?
NMDuc Nguyen Minh
This quote really captures the tension between what people claim to want—truth—and what they are actually willing to work for. It makes me think: do we sometimes shy away from the truth because it disrupts our worldview? Is it easier to accept comforting lies than to face harsh realities? Berkeley’s quote seems to point out that the pursuit of truth requires not just desire but the courage to confront difficult questions.
NNam
Berkeley’s words seem to suggest that truth is something we all desire, but very few are equipped or ready to actually confront it. Why is it that we, as a society, often settle for half-truths or convenient beliefs rather than seeking deeper truths? Is the search for truth a courageous pursuit, or is it an uncomfortable challenge that only a few dare to face? How do we change this dynamic?
TVPham Tran Tuong Vi
This quote makes me wonder: if truth is indeed the ‘cry of all,’ why do so few actually pursue it? Is it because the truth is too difficult or painful to accept? Or do people fear the consequences of truly understanding the truth, especially when it challenges established norms? Berkeley seems to be suggesting that while truth is universally sought, only those who can handle its complexities are willing to play the game.
DHDuy Hoang
George Berkeley’s quote highlights an interesting contradiction: while truth is something everyone desires, it seems only a few are truly willing to seek or engage with it. Does this suggest that most people only want truth when it aligns with their preferences? How often do we seek the truth in its purest form, rather than the version that’s easiest to digest? What does this say about our willingness to face uncomfortable truths?