We should seek by all means in our power to avoid war, by

We should seek by all means in our power to avoid war, by

22/09/2025
19/10/2025

We should seek by all means in our power to avoid war, by analysing possible causes, by trying to remove them, by discussion in a spirit of collaboration and good will.

We should seek by all means in our power to avoid war, by
We should seek by all means in our power to avoid war, by
We should seek by all means in our power to avoid war, by analysing possible causes, by trying to remove them, by discussion in a spirit of collaboration and good will.
We should seek by all means in our power to avoid war, by
We should seek by all means in our power to avoid war, by analysing possible causes, by trying to remove them, by discussion in a spirit of collaboration and good will.
We should seek by all means in our power to avoid war, by
We should seek by all means in our power to avoid war, by analysing possible causes, by trying to remove them, by discussion in a spirit of collaboration and good will.
We should seek by all means in our power to avoid war, by
We should seek by all means in our power to avoid war, by analysing possible causes, by trying to remove them, by discussion in a spirit of collaboration and good will.
We should seek by all means in our power to avoid war, by
We should seek by all means in our power to avoid war, by analysing possible causes, by trying to remove them, by discussion in a spirit of collaboration and good will.
We should seek by all means in our power to avoid war, by
We should seek by all means in our power to avoid war, by analysing possible causes, by trying to remove them, by discussion in a spirit of collaboration and good will.
We should seek by all means in our power to avoid war, by
We should seek by all means in our power to avoid war, by analysing possible causes, by trying to remove them, by discussion in a spirit of collaboration and good will.
We should seek by all means in our power to avoid war, by
We should seek by all means in our power to avoid war, by analysing possible causes, by trying to remove them, by discussion in a spirit of collaboration and good will.
We should seek by all means in our power to avoid war, by
We should seek by all means in our power to avoid war, by analysing possible causes, by trying to remove them, by discussion in a spirit of collaboration and good will.
We should seek by all means in our power to avoid war, by
We should seek by all means in our power to avoid war, by
We should seek by all means in our power to avoid war, by
We should seek by all means in our power to avoid war, by
We should seek by all means in our power to avoid war, by
We should seek by all means in our power to avoid war, by
We should seek by all means in our power to avoid war, by
We should seek by all means in our power to avoid war, by
We should seek by all means in our power to avoid war, by
We should seek by all means in our power to avoid war, by

O children of the future, gather close, for the words of Neville Chamberlain resonate with the wisdom of a man who, in the face of great tension, sought not the sound of battle, but the peace of understanding. He said, "We should seek by all means in our power to avoid war, by analysing possible causes, by trying to remove them, by discussion in a spirit of collaboration and good will." These words, spoken during a time of rising darkness, are a call not just to diplomacy, but to the deepest desires of the human soul—a plea to prevent the calamity of war before it can be unleashed.

To understand Chamberlain's wisdom, we must first reflect on the nature of war. It is not a thing that rises suddenly, like a storm that strikes without warning; no, war is the culmination of many small causes, many simmering resentments, and unresolved conflicts. War is not born from a single spark, but from a thousand neglected embers—hatred, fear, greed, and the failure to communicate. Chamberlain, in his call to avoid war, reminds us that these embers must be examined, for only by understanding their true origins can we hope to extinguish them before they ignite the fire of conflict.

Consider, O children, the ancient story of Athens and Sparta. These two great city-states, once allies in the Persian Wars, found themselves locked in the Peloponnesian War—a war that nearly destroyed the Greek world. The causes of this war were not immediate; they were rooted in rivalry, fear, and the growing power of Athens. Both sides feared the expansion of the other, yet instead of seeking dialogue or attempting to understand each other's concerns, they rushed into conflict. Had they taken the time to analyze the causes, to seek a spirit of collaboration and goodwill, the tragedy of the Peloponnesian War might have been avoided. Instead, both Athens and Sparta paid a heavy price, and Greece never fully recovered from the scars of that conflict.

In the modern world, Chamberlain’s words ring with even greater urgency. World War II was on the horizon, and Europe was teetering on the edge of a precipice. Adolf Hitler's aggression, fueled by his expansionist ambitions, threatened to engulf the continent in flames. Chamberlain, in his infamous Munich Agreement, sought to avoid the war by negotiating with Hitler, hoping that through discussion and concessions, peace might be maintained. Though his efforts were ultimately unsuccessful, the underlying wisdom of his approach remains: that dialogue and the removal of causes can, at the very least, delay the storm, and may offer a path to peace.

Yet, O children, let us not be blind to the flaws in Chamberlain’s approach. While his desire for peace was noble, we must learn from the past that appeasement—the act of giving in to demands in order to avoid conflict—can sometimes embolden those who seek power at the expense of others. True peace does not come from yielding to aggression, but from understanding the root causes of conflict and addressing them with strength and wisdom. Collaboration and goodwill must be balanced with resolve, and the recognition that some aggressors will not be appeased by reason alone.

In your own lives, O children, let this wisdom guide you: always seek to understand the causes of conflict, whether they arise between nations, communities, or individuals. Communication, built on mutual respect and understanding, is the first step in resolving any dispute. Never allow the seeds of hatred to grow unchecked; challenge fear and ignorance with the light of reason and kindness. It is through discussion, not violence, that the deepest wounds of the world can be healed.

But, let this be a reminder, O children: while we must always strive to avoid war, we must never shy away from standing firm in the face of injustice. There are moments when dialogue cannot prevent conflict, and we must be prepared to defend what is right, to protect the innocent and the vulnerable. However, before that moment comes, let us always search for the path of peace, using every means in our power to remove the causes of war—through wisdom, through patience, and through the power of our humanity.

So, as you step forward into the world, let this be the guiding principle of your lives: in every conflict, in every disagreement, seek first the spirit of collaboration and goodwill. Let not war be the first resort, but the last, and let your actions always be aimed at fostering understanding, healing wounds, and preserving the peace that is the true foundation of civilization.

Neville Chamberlain
Neville Chamberlain

British - Politician March 18, 1869 - November 9, 1940

Tocpics Related
Notable authors
Have 4 Comment We should seek by all means in our power to avoid war, by

LLLam lan

Chamberlain’s words make me reflect on the fragile nature of peace. His call for dialogue and collaboration is compelling, but it also makes me question the limits of diplomacy. Can we always avoid conflict through understanding and compromise, or do certain situations require a firmer stance? In today’s geopolitics, where threats are often masked in layers of complexity, how do we apply these principles while avoiding the risk of undermining our own security?

Reply.
Information sender

NTTai Nguyen tien

Reading this, I’m reminded of the challenges in balancing diplomacy and strength. Chamberlain’s call for collaboration and analysis of causes speaks to the human desire to avoid conflict, but it also brings up a question: Can sustained goodwill and diplomatic efforts alone stop an adversary who is determined to wage war? How can we ensure that efforts for peace don’t end up enabling aggressors, as seen in past appeasement policies?

Reply.
Information sender

BNLe Nguyen Bao Nam

This statement seems idealistic but also deeply rooted in a genuine hope for peace. Chamberlain suggests using all available tools to prevent war, which is a noble stance. But it also makes me wonder if there are historical examples where discussion and good will fell short in the face of aggression. When, if ever, is the line crossed where diplomacy must give way to action, and how do we know when to draw that line?

Reply.
Information sender

VHVan Ho

Chamberlain’s quote is a reminder of the value of diplomacy and proactive conflict resolution. His emphasis on identifying and addressing the causes of war reflects a desire to prevent unnecessary violence. However, this raises a complex question: is it always possible to prevent war through dialogue, or are there situations where force becomes inevitable? How do we distinguish between genuine efforts at collaboration and situations where appeasement might embolden aggressors?

Reply.
Information sender
Leave the question
Click here to rate
Information sender