We've used up a lot of bullets. And we talk about stimulus. But

We've used up a lot of bullets. And we talk about stimulus. But

22/09/2025
19/10/2025

We've used up a lot of bullets. And we talk about stimulus. But the truth is, we're running a federal deficit that's 9 percent of GDP. That is stimulative as all get out. It's more stimulative than any policy we've followed since World War II.

We've used up a lot of bullets. And we talk about stimulus. But
We've used up a lot of bullets. And we talk about stimulus. But
We've used up a lot of bullets. And we talk about stimulus. But the truth is, we're running a federal deficit that's 9 percent of GDP. That is stimulative as all get out. It's more stimulative than any policy we've followed since World War II.
We've used up a lot of bullets. And we talk about stimulus. But
We've used up a lot of bullets. And we talk about stimulus. But the truth is, we're running a federal deficit that's 9 percent of GDP. That is stimulative as all get out. It's more stimulative than any policy we've followed since World War II.
We've used up a lot of bullets. And we talk about stimulus. But
We've used up a lot of bullets. And we talk about stimulus. But the truth is, we're running a federal deficit that's 9 percent of GDP. That is stimulative as all get out. It's more stimulative than any policy we've followed since World War II.
We've used up a lot of bullets. And we talk about stimulus. But
We've used up a lot of bullets. And we talk about stimulus. But the truth is, we're running a federal deficit that's 9 percent of GDP. That is stimulative as all get out. It's more stimulative than any policy we've followed since World War II.
We've used up a lot of bullets. And we talk about stimulus. But
We've used up a lot of bullets. And we talk about stimulus. But the truth is, we're running a federal deficit that's 9 percent of GDP. That is stimulative as all get out. It's more stimulative than any policy we've followed since World War II.
We've used up a lot of bullets. And we talk about stimulus. But
We've used up a lot of bullets. And we talk about stimulus. But the truth is, we're running a federal deficit that's 9 percent of GDP. That is stimulative as all get out. It's more stimulative than any policy we've followed since World War II.
We've used up a lot of bullets. And we talk about stimulus. But
We've used up a lot of bullets. And we talk about stimulus. But the truth is, we're running a federal deficit that's 9 percent of GDP. That is stimulative as all get out. It's more stimulative than any policy we've followed since World War II.
We've used up a lot of bullets. And we talk about stimulus. But
We've used up a lot of bullets. And we talk about stimulus. But the truth is, we're running a federal deficit that's 9 percent of GDP. That is stimulative as all get out. It's more stimulative than any policy we've followed since World War II.
We've used up a lot of bullets. And we talk about stimulus. But
We've used up a lot of bullets. And we talk about stimulus. But the truth is, we're running a federal deficit that's 9 percent of GDP. That is stimulative as all get out. It's more stimulative than any policy we've followed since World War II.
We've used up a lot of bullets. And we talk about stimulus. But
We've used up a lot of bullets. And we talk about stimulus. But
We've used up a lot of bullets. And we talk about stimulus. But
We've used up a lot of bullets. And we talk about stimulus. But
We've used up a lot of bullets. And we talk about stimulus. But
We've used up a lot of bullets. And we talk about stimulus. But
We've used up a lot of bullets. And we talk about stimulus. But
We've used up a lot of bullets. And we talk about stimulus. But
We've used up a lot of bullets. And we talk about stimulus. But
We've used up a lot of bullets. And we talk about stimulus. But

The oracle of Omaha, Warren Buffett, spoke with clarity and gravity when he declared: “We’ve used up a lot of bullets. And we talk about stimulus. But the truth is, we’re running a federal deficit that’s 9 percent of GDP. That is stimulative as all get out. It’s more stimulative than any policy we’ve followed since World War II.” Behind these words lies the recognition that nations, like men, cannot forever spend what they do not have without consequence. The metaphor of “bullets” reveals the truth that economic tools, like weapons in battle, are finite. Once they are fired, they cannot easily be recalled.

To speak of stimulus is to speak of the effort of governments to revive their people in times of hardship. In the wake of financial collapse, recessions, or crises, rulers have sought to spend boldly, pouring treasure into the marketplace to keep the wheels of commerce turning. Yet Buffett warns: this path has limits. The deficit, swelling to nearly a tenth of the nation’s wealth, is itself a massive infusion of energy. It is as though the nation is already at full throttle, drawing power not from stored abundance but from borrowing against the future.

The origin of this warning lies in the years following the great financial crisis of 2008. Banks collapsed, markets trembled, and households faced ruin. To prevent disaster, the United States unleashed vast stimulus, increasing spending, slashing interest rates, and running deficits of historic proportion. Buffett, with the eyes of experience, looked upon this and said: we are already firing the greatest volley of economic bullets since the global struggle of World War II. Do not deceive yourselves into thinking more can be done without cost.

History itself gives proof of his meaning. After World War II, America’s debt soared to levels never before seen, as the government poured resources into the fight against tyranny. That debt, though heavy, was managed by growth, discipline, and sacrifice in the years that followed. But it could not have been borne forever without ruin. In other lands, where governments endlessly spent without reckoning, disaster came. Recall the Weimar Republic, where debts and reckless printing of money led to hyperinflation so severe that a wheelbarrow of notes could not buy a loaf of bread. Buffett’s warning is thus timeless: stimulus must be measured, or it turns from healing medicine into poison.

The lesson for us is not merely about nations, but about the lives of individuals. Each of us, in our own way, has a store of “bullets”—our savings, our energy, our patience, our time. In crisis, we must use them wisely. To spend recklessly, to exhaust ourselves without thought of the morrow, is to court disaster. To use them carefully, to recognize when we are already drawing deeply from the well, is to preserve strength for the battles yet to come.

Buffett’s words remind us also of honesty. It is easy for leaders, and for ourselves, to pretend that more can be done, that infinite resources remain, that new tools can always be found. But truth requires courage: to admit that we have already fired much, and that the task before us is not to find new weapons, but to endure, to heal, to rebuild with what remains. Discipline, not endless expenditure, becomes the safeguard of survival.

Therefore, let this wisdom be passed on: in the affairs of nations and of men, recognize the limits of your bullets, and wield them with care. Be generous, but not reckless. Be bold, but not blind. When times of trial come, let your actions be strong yet measured, always remembering that every choice today echoes into the future. For the true strength of a people is not only in their power to spend or to fight, but in their wisdom to know when the time has come to preserve, to endure, and to prepare for the days beyond the storm.

Warren Buffett
Warren Buffett

American - Businessman Born: August 30, 1930

Tocpics Related
Notable authors
Have 5 Comment We've used up a lot of bullets. And we talk about stimulus. But

NBNhung Bich

Warren Buffett’s statement challenges the typical notion that deficits are purely harmful. If the government continues running such large deficits, how will it affect the overall stability of the financial system? Can we truly keep pushing the boundaries of fiscal policy without facing serious consequences? I’d like to hear more from economic experts about whether this kind of deficit-driven stimulus is sustainable over the long term.

Reply.
Information sender

HTnguyen hoang thyngan

Is it a good thing or a bad thing that we’re running such a large deficit? Buffett seems to view it as a necessary tool for economic stimulation, but I can’t help but wonder if this signals a shift in economic thinking. Are we moving away from traditional economic models that prioritize balanced budgets? I think it’s important to consider whether this kind of deficit-driven policy could create a risky precedent for future governments.

Reply.
Information sender

OObito

Buffett’s comparison of the federal deficit to post-WWII policies is thought-provoking. His point about the stimulative nature of a large deficit makes me wonder whether there are other, perhaps more effective ways, to stimulate growth without burdening the economy with such a heavy debt load. Are we starting to normalize high deficits, or is this a unique situation driven by extraordinary times?

Reply.
Information sender

GDGold D.dragon

It’s alarming to think about the deficit reaching 9 percent of GDP, and Buffett is right to point out the scale of this issue. While it might provide short-term economic stimulus, what are the long-term effects? Will future generations face the burden of this massive deficit, or will it result in a structural shift in how economies function? I’d be curious to know how sustainable this really is in the long run.

Reply.
Information sender

TTTran Tien

Warren Buffett brings up an interesting point about the federal deficit and its role in stimulating the economy. When you think about it, increasing the deficit might seem counterproductive, but it's fascinating that he believes it could be more stimulative than traditional policies. Does this mean that governments may rely more on deficits rather than other methods like interest rate cuts to boost the economy in the future?

Reply.
Information sender
Leave the question
Click here to rate
Information sender