
When I look at relationships, my own and others, I see a wide
When I look at relationships, my own and others, I see a wide range of reasons for people to be together and ways in which they are together. I see ways in which a relationship - which means something that exists between two or more people - for the most part reinforces people's separateness as individual entities.






Hearken, O children of the ages, to the words of Ram Dass, who speaks with the voice of insight and contemplation: “When I look at relationships, my own and others, I see a wide range of reasons for people to be together and ways in which they are together. I see ways in which a relationship—which means something that exists between two or more people—for the most part reinforces people's separateness as individual entities.” Here lies the timeless teaching that bonds, though sacred and cherished, often illuminate not only connection, but the distinctness of the souls involved.
In the chronicles of old, the elders taught that every relationship is a mirror, reflecting the light and shadow of the self. Though hearts may entwine and spirits may seek union, the path of togetherness reveals the contours of individuality. Ram Dass observes that even in closeness, the separateness of each soul persists, and it is through this recognition that one may honor both connection and autonomy, understanding that true union does not erase the self, but enhances it.
The origin of this wisdom is ancient, spoken through the mouths of sages, mystics, and poets who pondered the nature of human bonds. Across mountains, rivers, and temples, it was taught that the dance of togetherness and solitude is the essence of living. Each relationship holds lessons in reflection and awareness, for it is in the encounter with another that one sees the full measure of one’s own individual entity. Ram Dass, in his modern voice, carries forward this eternal truth: that connection often illuminates distinction as much as unity.
O seekers, understand that the wisdom of relationships lies not solely in harmony, but in the recognition of difference and independence. To dwell together is to honor the shared journey, yet also to respect the boundaries of separateness that define each soul. Through this balance, one learns that love and companionship do not demand fusion, but invite understanding, patience, and the deep reverence for the self within the collective.
Let this teaching endure, children of the future: the path of a relationship is a sacred space where individual entities meet, reflect, and grow. To see and honor separateness within connection is to grasp the fullness of human bonds, to celebrate both unity and individuality, and to navigate the sacred interplay of hearts with wisdom, compassion, and presence.
If you wish, I can also craft a more poetic, ceremonial version, where relationships are depicted as a sacred dance between unity and separateness. Would you like me to do that?
HPNguyen Ha Phuong
Ram Dass brings up an interesting contradiction in relationships. While they are meant to connect us, they can also serve to highlight our separateness as individuals. It makes me wonder: do relationships sometimes become a way of avoiding true connection by focusing on the roles we play within them, instead of the deep, vulnerable connection between individuals? Could the real challenge in relationships be learning how to be fully ourselves while being truly connected to someone else?
TLDuong Thi Thu Lan
I find this quote very insightful, as it touches on the complexity of human connection. On one hand, we seek connection and intimacy, but on the other, maintaining individuality is key. How can relationships balance these two forces? Is it healthy to prioritize independence within a relationship, or does it risk creating distance between partners? This idea makes me wonder if the healthiest relationships are the ones where both individuals can grow and thrive independently yet together.
MNY may Nguyen
This perspective really challenges the way I view relationships. It’s easy to assume that being in a relationship means merging with another person, but Ram Dass’s view suggests the opposite—that relationships often reinforce our separateness. Is it possible that the healthiest relationships are those where each person maintains their own identity and space? What does that say about how we define closeness and connection in our partnerships? I’m curious to explore this more.
VVu
This quote really makes me reflect on the nature of relationships. Sometimes, we think that being together means we are completely united, but perhaps, as Ram Dass suggests, relationships can actually highlight our individual separateness. It’s interesting to consider whether true intimacy in relationships requires both parties to maintain their own individuality. Can we truly be close to someone while still honoring our separateness, or does the very act of being close lead to blending together too much?