Martin Filler

Martin Filler – Life, Career, and Memorable Thoughts

Martin Filler (born September 17, 1948) is an American architectural critic, essayist, and curator. Explore his biography, career milestones, signature works, perspectives on architecture, famous quotes, and the lessons from his critical practice.

Introduction

Martin Myles Filler (born September 17, 1948) is a distinguished American architecture critic, cultural commentator, and curator whose writing combines erudition, sharp judgment, and a commitment to placing architectural form and practice into broader social, historical, and aesthetic contexts. Over a career spanning several decades, his essays have influenced how readers see buildings—not just as objects, but as embodiments of values, power, and meaning. His voice in architectural criticism is respected for clarity, wit, and moral seriousness.

Early Life and Education

Martin Filler was born in Colorado Springs, Colorado, on September 17, 1948.

He pursued his higher education in New York:

He earned a Bachelor of Arts in Art History from Columbia College in 1970.
He then completed a Master’s degree in Art History and Archaeology at Columbia University in 1972.

This deep grounding in art history and architectural studies would inform his critical voice—rooted in historical awareness, formal analysis, and cultural literacy.

Career & Major Contributions

Early Career & orial Work

After finishing his education, Filler’s professional trajectory included editorial and curatorial roles:

In 1973, he joined Teachers College Press at Columbia University.
From 1974 to 1977, he worked at McGraw-Hill’s Architectural Record Books, where he edited anthologies of major architectural and design thinkers like Frank Lloyd Wright and Lewis Mumford.
He began contributing book reviews and shorter pieces to Architectural Record circa 1974, then advanced into editorial roles at Progressive Architecture.
Later he became associated with House & Garden (a Condé Nast publication) as critic and editor, a position he held until the magazine’s closure in 2007.
He also served as editor and contributor at Vanity Fair (1990–1994), writing profiles of artists, architects, and cultural figures.

These roles positioned Filler at the intersection of architecture, design, art, and public culture, giving him a broad platform from which to critique and interpret.

Essays & Long-Form Criticism

One of Filler’s signature contributions is his series of long-form essays on modern and contemporary architecture:

Since 1985, his essays have appeared regularly in The New York Review of Books, garnering attention for their depth, narrative quality, and critical perspective.
His collected essays have been published in book form. His first major anthology, Makers of Modern Architecture (2007), gathered his essays on iconic 20th-century architects.
Subsequent volumes—Makers of Modern Architecture, Volume II (2013) and Volume III (2018)—extend his survey and critique into later figures and movements.
His writing is known for combining historiography, architectural form analysis, cultural critique, and often pointed evaluations of architectural trend, failure, or excess.

In critical reception, Filler has been compared to earlier influential critics like Ada Louise Huxtable, especially for bringing moral dimension and narrative clarity to architectural criticism.

Curatorial, Exhibition & Film Work

Beyond essays, Filler has engaged in curatorial and documentary projects:

He and his wife, architectural historian Rosemarie Haag Bletter, co-curated the Whitney Museum’s High Styles: Twentieth Century American Design exhibition (1984).
They also collaborated on the Brooklyn Museum’s Vital Forms: American Art and Design in the Atomic Age, 1940–1960.
Together with Bletter, Filler conducted interviews and contributed to documentary films such as Beyond Utopia: Changing Attitudes in American Architecture (1983), Arata Isozaki (1985), and James Stirling (1987).
He has also served as guest curator for architecture and design exhibitions in museums.

These ventures reflect his belief not only in writing about architecture, but in shaping how architecture is presented, narrated, and contextualized in cultural spaces.

Influence and Public Stances

Filler’s criticism has sometimes had real impact on architectural debates:

In 2013, he published a strongly worded essay in The New York Review of Books titled “MoMA: A Needless Act of Destruction”, challenging MoMA’s plan to demolish the adjacent American Folk Art Museum building. That essay played a role in spurring reconsideration of the museum’s architectural plans.
His critical voice is not shy to denounce what he sees as architectural failures. For example, he criticized the Gwathmey Siegel addition to the Guggenheim Museum as an act of architectural vandalism.
He has at times drawn controversy: his 2014–2015 article on Zaha Hadid (in The New York Review of Books) contained erroneous claims regarding worker deaths in Qatar while building one of her projects — he later issued a public statement correcting the error.
His style is known for combining intellectual seriousness, aesthetic sensitivity, and moral critique—he often judges buildings not just on form or program but on how they reflect societal values, power dynamics, and meaning.

Legacy & Influence

Filler has helped define and sustain a critical tradition in architecture that refuses purely celebratory or technical writing—he sees buildings as part of cultural and political life.
His essays have introduced wider audiences to architectural ideas—connecting architecture to biography, urbanism, politics, and cultural shifts.
He has influenced younger critics and writers who see architecture not only as form but as narrative, as argument, as civic engagement.
Through his curatorial and documentary work, he has brought architectural discourse into museum, exhibition, and visual media contexts, helping shape how architecture is narrated visually and institutionally.

Personality, Approach & Values

Martin Filler is often described as rigorous, articulate, intellectually fearless, and willing to take stands. His writing demonstrates:

Clarity and narrative: He structures essays so that architectural examination is embedded in story, idea, and critique.
Critical distance: He carefully maintains a balance between appreciation and suspicion—he will praise architects, but also hold them accountable.
Interdisciplinary sensitivity: He draws on art history, cultural theory, biography, politics, and social context in his writing.
Moral dimension: He treats architecture as a form of cultural expression, implicating social responsibility in design and urbanism.

His affiliation (e.g. being elected a Fellow of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences in 2003) reflects the respect his peers have for his contributions.

Selected Quotations & Ideas

While Filler is primarily an essayist rather than a quote-platform figure, here are some representative lines and ideas drawn from his writings and interviews:

“I always decline requests to write introductions to architects’ monographs … because that would compromise my critical independence.”
— On maintaining distance between critic and subject

On a renovation of the Guggenheim: he called the Gwathmey Siegel addition “the most appalling act of architectural vandalism since the demolition of Pennsylvania Station.”

About MoMA’s plan to demolish the Folk Art Museum building: in his essay “MoMA: A Needless Act of Destruction”, Filler argued that culture and memory deserve defense, not sacrifice for expansion.

On architectural criticism: his practice suggests that form, site, materials, client, historical lineage, and social meaning are all part of what it means to judge a building—not just how it looks. (Paraphrase of themes across his essays)

These statements reflect his commitment to critical integrity, architectural memory, and the cultural stakes of building decisions.

Lessons from Martin Filler’s Work

Criticism matters. Thoughtful, informed architectural criticism can influence how we build, preserve, and value spaces.
Maintain independence. Filler’s refusal to be co-opted by architects or projects preserves his credibility.
Link architecture to life. Buildings don’t exist in isolation; Filler reminds us to ask: What do they say about power, economy, culture, and humanity?
Speak truth with rigor. Even in complex, contested debates, clarity and intellectual courage matter.
Curate as critique. His museum and film work shows that architectural discourse exists not just in print—but in exhibition, image, and narration.

Conclusion

Martin Filler stands as a leading figure in 20th- and 21st-century architectural criticism: not just for the volume of his writing, but for its quality, moral engagement, and cultural reach. He offers readers a model of how architecture can be taken seriously—as form, as idea, and as expression of our shared world. His legacy is not only in his essays but in the way he invites us to see buildings as part of our collective story.

Articles by the author