I despair of ever writing excellent poetry.
Hear the voice of Isaac Rosenberg, soldier and poet, who once confessed with a heart weighed down: “I despair of ever writing excellent poetry.” These words do not reveal weakness but humanity, for even the greatest spirits are sometimes crushed beneath doubt. Rosenberg, who would die in the trenches of the Great War, spoke not from vanity, but from the aching knowledge of how high the mountain of poetry truly is, and how small one feels when standing at its base. His despair is not the denial of his gift, but the cry of one who yearns for greatness yet fears he cannot reach it.
The meaning of his lament is rooted in the eternal struggle of the artist: the gulf between vision and expression. Every poet dreams of perfection, of lines that endure beyond their time, but what they write often feels inadequate, falling short of the majesty they imagine. Rosenberg’s despair belongs to all who create—for to love an art deeply is also to feel unworthy of it. His words remind us that self-doubt is not the enemy of greatness, but its constant companion.
The ancients themselves knew this torment. Virgil, though celebrated in his age, was so dissatisfied with the Aeneid that he wished it burned upon his death. Michelangelo, even as he carved David, spoke of how the stone defied him, and how his hand was unfit for the visions that haunted his mind. In every age, those who touched greatness did so while trembling with the belief that they had failed. Rosenberg’s despair echoes this timeless truth: that humility and doubt often walk beside true genius.
History gives us vivid confirmation in the life of Emily Dickinson. She wrote nearly two thousand poems, yet published only a handful in her lifetime, and even then reluctantly. She feared her work was unworthy, that it would not stand before the scrutiny of others. And yet, her words endure with eternal fire, studied and loved across the world. So too with Rosenberg: though he despaired of excellence, his war poems—“Break of Day in the Trenches,” “Dead Man’s Dump”—are counted among the finest of his generation, carrying a truth few could equal.
There is paradox here. The poet despairs of writing excellent poetry, and yet that very despair is the mark of excellence. For the arrogant write carelessly, satisfied with mediocrity, while the true poet wrestles with his own inadequacy. Rosenberg’s doubt was not a flaw but the soil in which greatness grew. His humility forced him to push harder, to write more honestly, to strip away all vanity until only truth remained. The despair he voiced was itself proof that he understood the weight of poetry.
The lesson for us is clear: do not fear your doubts, nor despair when your work feels small. Doubt is the sign that you care deeply, that you see the height of the calling. To despair, as Rosenberg did, is to stand before the vastness of art with reverence. What matters is not that you feel inadequate, but that you continue nonetheless. For excellence is rarely recognized by the one who creates it—it is recognized by those who come after, who see in the imperfect work a glimmer of eternity.
Practical wisdom flows from this. When you create, embrace your doubts, but do not let them silence you. Write, paint, sing, build—not because you are certain of greatness, but because your soul demands expression. Share your work even if it feels unworthy, for history has shown that what one despairs over may be the very thing future generations treasure. And remember: despair is not the end of the journey, but the shadow that follows those who walk toward greatness.
Thus Rosenberg’s words endure as both lament and hidden triumph: he despaired of excellence, yet he achieved it. His confession teaches us that true greatness does not spring from pride, but from humility, from the ceaseless struggle to reach beyond oneself. Let this truth be passed down—that despair is not the death of art, but often its birth, and that the poet who feels unworthy may, in the end, write words that outlive empires.
DLdoan duc lam
This statement evokes questions about the relationship between ambition and self-doubt. Does Rosenberg’s despair indicate a perfectionist drive, or is it a response to external pressures and comparisons with other poets? I also wonder how artists reconcile the desire for excellence with the inevitability of imperfection. Could the acknowledgment of never achieving ultimate mastery be a source of humility and continuous growth, shaping a poet’s voice in ways that striving for excellence alone cannot?
MHNguyen Manh Hung
I’m struck by the emotional honesty in Rosenberg’s words. Does this despair reveal more about his sensitivity and dedication to craft than about actual failure? I also wonder whether feelings of hopelessness in achieving excellence are part of the creative tension necessary for innovation. How might acknowledging this despair, rather than ignoring it, influence a poet’s willingness to experiment, take risks, or pursue authenticity over recognition?
NTHong Duyen Nguyen Thi
This quote makes me reflect on the subjective nature of artistic achievement. Is Rosenberg’s despair rooted in objective shortcomings, or is it a personal perception shaped by high standards? I also question whether such feelings of inadequacy are universal among writers, and how they influence the way poetry is written and revised. Could this sense of never reaching excellence paradoxically push a poet to explore new forms, themes, or depths of expression?
DNNguyen Dinh Nam
I find this statement poignant because it captures the insecurity that often accompanies creative work. Does Rosenberg feel that excellence is an unreachable ideal, or is it a reflection of self-criticism that fuels striving? I also wonder how this sense of despair affects productivity—does it motivate continuous effort, or create paralysis and discouragement? Could this tension between aspiration and doubt be an essential part of the poetic process?
CLChloe Lam
Reading this, I feel a sense of vulnerability and doubt in Rosenberg’s words. I wonder whether this despair stems from comparing himself to other poets, or from an internal standard he feels unable to meet. How common is this feeling among poets and artists, and does it drive growth or hinder creativity? I also question whether his perception of 'excellent' poetry is shaped more by personal ambition or by external expectations from readers and critics.