I measure the progress of a community by the degree of progress
I measure the progress of a community by the degree of progress which women have achieved.
The words of B. R. Ambedkar—“I measure the progress of a community by the degree of progress which women have achieved”—resound like a judgment from the eternal tribunal of justice. They declare that no society, however wealthy, however advanced in technology, however proud of its monuments, can be called truly progressive if its women remain bound in chains. For the fate of women is the mirror of a nation’s soul; where they rise, the community flourishes, and where they are cast down, all humanity sinks with them.
The origin of this wisdom lies in the long struggle for dignity that Ambedkar himself carried in his own life. As a leader who rose from oppression to become a voice for the voiceless in India, he saw clearly that communities could not be measured by the wealth of kings or the glory of temples, but by the condition of their most vulnerable. And who more vulnerable, in ages past, than women—denied education, stripped of rights, silenced in council, and reduced to shadows in the home? To Ambedkar, the true measure of justice was whether these women could stand as equals, walking side by side with men in knowledge, in opportunity, in freedom.
History itself confirms his words. Consider the age of Sparta, where unlike in other Greek cities, women were given education, training, and a measure of freedom. While Athens, with all its philosophy, kept women behind closed doors, Sparta flourished with a resilience born of women who could bear strong children, manage estates, and speak their will. This strength was no accident; it was the fruit of granting dignity to half the community. The progress of women lifted the whole.
Or think of Japan in the post-war era, where one of the great transformations was the granting of suffrage and expanded rights to women. As they entered education and the workforce, the nation experienced a flowering of industry and innovation. Their contributions became the very heartbeat of Japan’s progress, demonstrating that when women achieve, the community advances not by inches, but by leaps.
The meaning of Ambedkar’s words is sharp and unavoidable: progress cannot be measured in gold, in weapons, or in towering buildings. These are but illusions if the daughters of the land remain shackled. The true foundation of progress is equality—when women are educated, when their voices are heard, when their talents are free to shape the destiny of the community. A society that denies this is not advanced, but crippled, walking only on one leg while the other is bound.
The lesson for us is clear: if we wish to see our nations flourish, we must look to the condition of our women. Are they free from fear? Do they have equal opportunity to learn, to lead, to shape the future? If not, then no matter what else is gained, the community is still in chains. Justice demands that we measure ourselves not by what the powerful achieve, but by what the once-silenced are now allowed to create.
Practical wisdom calls us to act: educate your daughters as well as your sons. Listen to the voices of women in the home, the workplace, and the halls of power. Support policies that ensure safety, equality, and dignity for all. And in daily life, challenge the customs and prejudices that seek to keep women small. For in their rising lies the rising of the whole.
Thus, let Ambedkar’s words endure as a torch passed from generation to generation: the progress of a community is bound to the progress of its women. To uplift them is to uplift all; to hold them down is to sink the nation. Remember, then, that the true measure of greatness lies not in monuments of stone, but in the flourishing of mothers, daughters, and sisters who carry within them the light of humanity’s future.
NTKim Chau Nguyen Thi
B. R. Ambedkar’s statement makes me reflect on the intersection of gender and societal development. It suggests that a true measure of a community's progress can only be understood when women have equal opportunities. But in communities where women's rights are still restricted, is it possible to make real progress without addressing gender equality first? How can we create environments where women’s empowerment is a central focus of development?
Dduykhang2010
I admire Ambedkar’s belief that the progress of women is a reflection of societal progress. However, it makes me wonder: How can we measure this in tangible terms? What criteria should we use to evaluate the progress of women, especially when there are so many variables like education, healthcare, legal rights, and representation that impact their advancement? Could we do more to refine how we track these indicators?
NMnguyen my
Ambedkar’s idea challenges us to reconsider what true progress looks like. If women are not achieving equal access to opportunities and rights, does it mean that the society as a whole has not truly progressed? I think this could lead to a deeper conversation about how we define success and progress in a community. Are we overlooking the importance of empowering women in these assessments?
BT9a3 Bao Tran
This quote by Ambedkar is powerful and brings into focus the crucial role women play in the development of society. However, it raises the question: Are we truly progressing when women’s rights are still being fought for in many parts of the world? How do we ensure that these advancements are not just symbolic but lead to real, lasting change in the lives of women and girls everywhere?
HNHang Nguyen
B. R. Ambedkar’s perspective is thought-provoking. By measuring the progress of a community based on the advancement of women, he highlights the importance of gender equality as a marker of societal health. But I wonder: In today’s world, how do we accurately assess the progress of women in communities where cultural, economic, or political barriers still exist? Can we truly gauge progress without addressing these deeper inequalities first?