
There are many, many different kinds of intersectional
There are many, many different kinds of intersectional exclusions - not just black women but other women of color. Not just people of color, but people with disabilities. Immigrants. LGBTQ people. Indigenous people.






The words of Kimberlé Williams Crenshaw — “There are many, many different kinds of intersectional exclusions — not just black women but other women of color. Not just people of color, but people with disabilities. Immigrants. LGBTQ people. Indigenous people.” — are a torch lit against the shadows of invisibility. She names the many who walk through the world unseen, those pressed not by one burden alone, but by many layered upon each other. This teaching is the essence of intersectionality: that oppression is not singular, but woven, and to ignore this truth is to leave countless voices unheard.
The meaning is both profound and urgent. It is easy to imagine injustice as simple, touching each group in the same way. But Crenshaw reminds us that a black woman suffers differently than a black man or a white woman, that an immigrant with disabilities faces barriers unknown to either group alone. These overlapping struggles are exclusions, carved not from malice alone but from the blindness of systems that see only one identity at a time. Her call is to awaken the eyes of justice, to see the fullness of human experience.
History bears witness to these hidden intersections. Consider the fate of Native American women in the United States: not only oppressed as women, not only as Indigenous, but also silenced as both at once. Their voices were doubly erased, their struggles unseen by feminist movements that centered white women, and by civil rights movements that centered men. In their story lies the very truth Crenshaw proclaims: that justice, if it does not account for intersectional exclusions, remains incomplete.
The origin of these words lies in Crenshaw’s groundbreaking work as a scholar and advocate, naming what had long existed but not been spoken. She gave language to the lived reality of millions who knew themselves unseen. By naming LGBTQ people, immigrants, and those with disabilities alongside women of color, she teaches that liberation cannot be piecemeal. To lift one group while ignoring others is to build freedom on sand. Only by embracing all, especially those at the crossroads of oppression, can justice be real.
Therefore, O children of tomorrow, remember this: the fight for equality must be wide enough to gather every soul. Let no one be cast aside because their suffering is complex, their identity inconvenient, their story unheard. As Kimberlé Williams Crenshaw teaches, the true measure of justice is not in how it treats the strong and visible, but how it shelters the vulnerable at the margins. To ignore the intersectional is to fail the human spirit itself.
TMtruc my
Crenshaw’s emphasis on the diversity of intersectional exclusions is important, but it’s also a bit overwhelming. We often struggle to see how different systems of oppression affect people in unique ways. Is it possible to take an intersectional approach to activism while ensuring we aren’t just addressing surface-level issues? How can we truly understand and fight against these compounded exclusions, while also creating space for every group to share their experience?
DTduc do tam
Kimberlé Crenshaw’s quote underscores the critical need to understand intersectionality in social justice work. But how do we go about addressing the specific needs of each group without making their struggles into a competition? Can we find a way to empower all marginalized communities without leaving any behind? It feels like the conversation needs to shift from seeing these issues as separate to truly grasping how they overlap and compound one another.
NA4. Do Thi Ngoc Anh
I agree with Crenshaw that there are many groups facing layers of exclusion, but it feels overwhelming to think about how to address all of them. If we try to focus on every single intersection, can we really create meaningful change, or would it stretch our efforts too thin? How do we ensure that every voice, whether it’s of a black woman, an immigrant, or an LGBTQ person, is heard and valued in these discussions?
TPNhu Thao Pham
Crenshaw's focus on the many kinds of intersectional exclusions reminds me how easy it is for society to overlook the experiences of marginalized groups when their struggles don't fit into a single category. It makes me wonder—do we give enough attention to people who are facing multiple forms of oppression at once? Are we too quick to prioritize one issue over another when they often intertwine in such complex ways?
KCKim Chi
Kimberlé Crenshaw’s words highlight the complexity of intersectionality, which often goes unnoticed in conversations about discrimination. She’s right—when we think about exclusion, it’s not just about one identity; it's about how multiple aspects of a person’s identity can overlap and create unique challenges. But how do we address these layered issues without losing sight of the individual struggles each group faces? Can society really address every intersection of inequality effectively?