Instead of trying to come up and pontificate on what literature

Instead of trying to come up and pontificate on what literature

22/09/2025
16/10/2025

Instead of trying to come up and pontificate on what literature is, you need to talk with children, to teachers, and make sure they get poetry in the curriculum early.

Instead of trying to come up and pontificate on what literature
Instead of trying to come up and pontificate on what literature
Instead of trying to come up and pontificate on what literature is, you need to talk with children, to teachers, and make sure they get poetry in the curriculum early.
Instead of trying to come up and pontificate on what literature
Instead of trying to come up and pontificate on what literature is, you need to talk with children, to teachers, and make sure they get poetry in the curriculum early.
Instead of trying to come up and pontificate on what literature
Instead of trying to come up and pontificate on what literature is, you need to talk with children, to teachers, and make sure they get poetry in the curriculum early.
Instead of trying to come up and pontificate on what literature
Instead of trying to come up and pontificate on what literature is, you need to talk with children, to teachers, and make sure they get poetry in the curriculum early.
Instead of trying to come up and pontificate on what literature
Instead of trying to come up and pontificate on what literature is, you need to talk with children, to teachers, and make sure they get poetry in the curriculum early.
Instead of trying to come up and pontificate on what literature
Instead of trying to come up and pontificate on what literature is, you need to talk with children, to teachers, and make sure they get poetry in the curriculum early.
Instead of trying to come up and pontificate on what literature
Instead of trying to come up and pontificate on what literature is, you need to talk with children, to teachers, and make sure they get poetry in the curriculum early.
Instead of trying to come up and pontificate on what literature
Instead of trying to come up and pontificate on what literature is, you need to talk with children, to teachers, and make sure they get poetry in the curriculum early.
Instead of trying to come up and pontificate on what literature
Instead of trying to come up and pontificate on what literature is, you need to talk with children, to teachers, and make sure they get poetry in the curriculum early.
Instead of trying to come up and pontificate on what literature
Instead of trying to come up and pontificate on what literature
Instead of trying to come up and pontificate on what literature
Instead of trying to come up and pontificate on what literature
Instead of trying to come up and pontificate on what literature
Instead of trying to come up and pontificate on what literature
Instead of trying to come up and pontificate on what literature
Instead of trying to come up and pontificate on what literature
Instead of trying to come up and pontificate on what literature
Instead of trying to come up and pontificate on what literature

Hear the wise counsel of Rita Dove, who declared: “Instead of trying to come up and pontificate on what literature is, you need to talk with children, to teachers, and make sure they get poetry in the curriculum early.” In these words burns both humility and urgency. She warns against lofty debates that circle endlessly like smoke in the air, detached from the soil of life. True literature is not born in arguments of definition, but in the hands and hearts of the young, when their ears are first opened to the rhythm of language and their imaginations quickened by the breath of verse.

The ancients knew this truth long before. In the schools of Athens, boys recited Homer by heart, not to argue what “literature” was, but to let the cadence of the Iliad and the Odyssey shape their souls. In China, children learned the poetry of the Tang before they could wield brush or sword, for it was believed that to know a poem was to know one’s humanity. The wisdom of the elders was passed not in lectures about form or theory, but in songs and stories told at dawn and dusk. So Dove calls us back to that ancient path: to plant poetry early, like seed in young soil, before cynicism and distraction take root.

Consider the story of Frederick Douglass, who, as a child in slavery, was forbidden from learning to read. Yet he hungered for words, catching scraps of knowledge where he could, and when at last he mastered language, it became the sword of his freedom. Had literature—had poetry—been placed in his hands earlier, how much more swiftly might his spirit have been unbound? His story reveals the power of early encounter with words, and the tragedy when such gifts are withheld.

Dove also reminds us that the guardians of this treasure are not scholars in their towers, but teachers in their classrooms, and the children who listen with wonder. To bring poetry into their daily lives is not mere decoration; it is to train them in empathy, imagination, and courage. For a child who learns to see the world through metaphor will not grow into an adult who sees only profit and loss. A nation that places poetry in the mouths of its young will raise citizens who remember beauty even in times of trial.

Yet how often do we, in our pride, forget this? Too many waste breath in conferences, declaring what art “ought” to be, while the classrooms remain bare of song. Too many exalt the critic’s voice while the child’s ear grows empty. Dove pierces through such vanity: better to bring one poem into one child’s heart than to win a thousand debates about “what literature is.” The living seed matters more than the lifeless definition.

The lesson for us is urgent. If we would preserve culture, if we would nurture wisdom, then we must not delay. Place poetry early in the lives of the young. Let them memorize a stanza as they might a prayer; let them recite aloud so the rhythm becomes breath. Encourage teachers, who are the priests of language in our time, to carry this sacred flame. Do not starve the young of beauty, for once starved, their spirits may never recover.

Practical actions are clear. Parents: read poems to your children at night. Teachers: weave verses into daily lessons, not as burdens but as gifts. Communities: make space for readings, festivals, and contests where children may speak words older and larger than themselves. And individuals: carry a poem in your heart and share it freely, for you may plant in another a seed that grows for a lifetime.

Thus Rita Dove speaks not as theorist, but as prophet of renewal. She reminds us that the future of literature does not lie in ivory towers but in the laughter and voices of the young. Let us, then, heed her words: abandon idle pontification, and instead place the fire of poetry into the hands of children and teachers, that the flame may burn bright for generations yet unborn.

Rita Dove
Rita Dove

American - Poet Born: August 28, 1952

Tocpics Related
Notable authors
Have 4 Comment Instead of trying to come up and pontificate on what literature

TNTran Trong Nghia

This makes me reflect on the broader implications for cultural literacy. If children aren’t introduced to poetry early, could society lose touch with important literary traditions and creative expression? How much responsibility falls on educators versus writers themselves to bring poetry into classrooms? I also wonder whether technology and multimedia tools could play a role in making poetry more engaging for young learners, bridging the gap between literary theory and lived experience.

Reply.
Information sender

HLPhung Hoang Linh

I’m struck by the emphasis on engagement over pontification. Does this suggest that some literary critics or scholars are out of touch with the realities of education? It makes me wonder how early exposure to poetry could influence children’s cognitive and emotional development. Are there programs or examples where this hands-on, conversational approach has been implemented successfully, and what impact has it had on students’ attitudes toward reading and writing?

Reply.
Information sender

KKhoi

This statement raises questions about the gap between academic theory and classroom practice. Why do so many discussions about literature stay abstract rather than focusing on students’ experiences? I’m curious whether involving children and teachers directly could reshape curriculum priorities and make poetry more accessible. How can policymakers and educators collaborate to ensure that literature isn’t just a subject, but a living, engaging part of students’ daily learning?

Reply.
Information sender

HNNguyen Ha Nhi

I really appreciate the practical approach here. It makes me wonder how much poetry is actually integrated into early education today. Are teachers equipped with the resources and training to engage children meaningfully with poetry, or is it often overlooked? Could prioritizing early exposure foster a lifelong appreciation for literature, and might it also enhance critical thinking, empathy, and creativity in ways that other subjects cannot?

Reply.
Information sender
Leave the question
Click here to rate
Information sender